I am doing a new setup, got most of the files in place from other places
and then ran my rsync backup from the command line before putting it in
crontab. Here is the rsync:
rsync -ah --stats --delete /home/ /mnt/sdc1/backups/homebase/home
Note that the directory /homebase/home did not
On 04/14/2013 10:28 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.04.2013 16:17, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
I am doing a new setup, got most of the files in place from other places
and then ran my rsync backup from the command line before putting it in
crontab. Here is the rsync:
rsync -ah --stats
I have been tied up with other work and Holidays. Now back to some
server work that is long overdue. I lost an old server yesterday so it
is crunch time.
I believe my new platform is suppose to be an x86_64. The order form
says 64 bit.
I booted Centos 6.3 i386 liveCD to check the system
On 04/10/2013 10:04 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.04.2013 15:58, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
I believe my new platform is suppose to be an x86_64. The order form
says 64 bit.
I booted Centos 6.3 i386 liveCD to check the system out before an install.
uname -i
reports i386
no wonder, you
On 04/10/2013 10:23 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
On 04/10/2013 09:58 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have been tied up with other work and Holidays. Now back to some
server work that is long overdue. I lost an old server yesterday so it
is crunch time.
I believe my new platform is suppose
On 03/14/2013 07:09 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.comwrote:
Ugh I clicked reply rather than reply-all on your message that was also
sent directly to me.
Back on the list we go. :)
On 03/14/2013 12:33 PM, SilverTip257 wrote
On 03/14/2013 12:33 AM, Austin Einter wrote:
Hi Les Mikesell
The rpm installed in my m/c is *amavisd-new-2.6.4-2.el6.noarch*.
I believe it is from epel (I have epel repo enabled).
Is it incompatible?
If you ARE using the amavisd from epel, you should follow the
instructions from:
On 03/12/2013 11:24 PM, Austin Einter wrote:
Dear All
I am able to send receive mail properly with use of roundcube.
Thanks a lot for all your support.
The last thing I did was started dovecot service, then roundcuble was able
to work properly.
Yes, with no IMAP server, your email client
I have a few oqo2 units that I use for testing, normally using the
dongle for ethernet connection. Well supposedly they have atheros
wifi. in dmseg I see:
ath5k :03:04.0: PCI INT A - GSI 17 (level, low) - IRQ 17
ath5k :03:04.0: registered as 'phy0'
ath5k phy0: Couldn't identify radio
Yesterday, in a hall conversation, I was strongly directed to bind 9.9.
It can do the inline signing of a zone changes that 9.8 can't.
So today, I went digging for someone supplying it all nicely packaged
for me; my servers are all i386.
I found a couple sources but the one that I found is:
On 03/13/2013 03:03 PM, Dirk Olmes wrote:
On 03/13/2013 04:30 PM, Craig White wrote:
you need an IMAP server / MTA to handle login accounts since Postfix
provides SMTP.
Dovecot? Cyrus-IMAP?
I'd go for dovecot - actively maintained, designed for security, easy to
configure.
The OP is
On 03/13/2013 07:03 PM, Austin Einter wrote:
Dear All
I have some basic doubts.
1. Do I need to run postfix like /etc/init.d/postfix restart
2. What I found it , it is starting.., but when I check immediately ps -ef
| grep postfix, I do not see any postfix process running.
In Centos we
On 03/13/2013 07:42 PM, Austin Einter wrote:
Dear Robert
I have a bigger problem.
sendmail was running previously. thats the reason I was able to send mail.
Mow did chkconfig off for sendmail.
Now postfix is running.
Both send/recv not working now.
While sending mail from roundcuble it
On 03/13/2013 11:17 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.comwrote:
I have a few oqo2 units that I use for testing, normally using the
dongle for ethernet connection. Well supposedly they have atheros
wifi. in dmseg I see:
ath5k
On 03/11/2013 04:39 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Am 11.03.2013 03:54, schrieb Austin Einter:
Dear All
I am planning to setup mail server for my domain.
Which one is preferred postfix or sendmail.
Choose the one you understand best.
I came across a link *
On 03/11/2013 04:52 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
Am 11.03.2013 03:54, schrieb Austin Einter:
I am planning to setup mail server for my domain.
Which one is preferred postfix or sendmail.
Choose the one your most familiar with.
If you aren't familiar with either, find someone who is.
Setting
On 03/11/2013 05:08 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
- Firewall and SELinux should be disabled.
Bad advice.
this page also configures unsafe imap and pop settings. People should
always enable only ssl-enabled versions of imap and pop only.
Just don't open those ports. Then they only work
On 03/11/2013 05:27 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2013/3/11 Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com:
On 03/11/2013 05:08 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
- Firewall and SELinux should be disabled.
Bad advice.
this page also configures unsafe imap and pop settings. People should
always enable only
On 03/11/2013 09:27 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Mon, March 11, 2013 04:52, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
Am 11.03.2013 03:54, schrieb Austin Einter:
I am planning to setup mail server for my domain.
Which one is preferred postfix or sendmail.
Postfix.
I have been running Sendmail from version
On 03/11/2013 07:05 PM, Austin Einter wrote:
Dear All
This is my continuation of postfix setup.
Following link
http://campworld.net/thewiki/pmwiki.php/LinuxServersCentOS/Cent6VirtMailServerfor
postfix setup.
At one stage it says,
Configuring The Server Setup SSL Certificate
Now generate
On 03/11/2013 10:30 PM, Austin Einter wrote:
Dear Robert Moskowitz
The link
*/http://campworld.net/thewiki/pmwiki.php/LinuxServersCentOS/Cent6VirtMailServer/*you
suggested is working great for me so far.
At one point it says
Configuring Postfix
Here we go with more config
On 03/12/2013 12:28 AM, Austin Einter wrote:
I am following the link
http://campworld.net/thewiki/pmwiki.php/LinuxServersCentOS/Cent6VirtMailServerfor
postfix setup. Looks it does not say anywhere yum install postfix. Do
I
need to do yum install postfix additionally including steps mentioned
On 03/10/2013 07:57 AM, Austin Einter wrote:
Dear All
I have a CentOS 6.3 machine. I am trying to setup DNS BIND setup in that
machine. It is having a static global IP. I have done lot of reading ,
google search and tried all possible option, but still not able to resolve
the issue.
My
On 03/10/2013 10:19 AM, Peter Eckel wrote:
Hi Austin,
since your A record is fine and can be resolved, the issue is obviously not
BIND related but lies somewhere in your network/firewall configuration.
The last address that is visible in the tracereoute output from here is
15
Is there a way (software) to turn a Centos server into an AP?
The server will have DHCP and RADVD, so no ARP proxying needed. This is
for a small lab setup.
yumex is not helping me search for an answer.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 03/10/2013 03:01 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Is there a way (software) to turn a Centos server into an AP?
The server will have DHCP and RADVD, so no ARP proxying needed. This is
for a small lab setup.
yumex is not helping me search for an answer.
I just found hostapd for Fedora
On 03/10/2013 03:15 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.03.2013 20:06, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 03/10/2013 03:01 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Is there a way (software) to turn a Centos server into an AP?
The server will have DHCP and RADVD, so no ARP proxying needed. This is
for a small lab
On 03/10/2013 04:35 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 3/10/2013 1:22 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I just found hostapd for Fedora, but it is not showing up in my Centos
repos.
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/2/simple/2
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/15160581/dir/redhat_el_6/com
I am being hit on a number of my systems with yum update reporting 270+
rpms to update, and MOST are coming from the base repo. I checked a few
out, and yes, they are of a higher release.
I don't recall ever seeing the base repo change; it is almost like it is
picking up the the 6.4 base repo
On 03/10/2013 09:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.03.2013 02:30, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
I am being hit on a number of my systems with yum update reporting 270+
rpms to update, and MOST are coming from the base repo. I checked a few
out, and yes, they are of a higher release.
I don't
On 03/10/2013 10:54 PM, Austin Einter wrote:
Dear All
I am planning to setup mail server for my domain.
Which one is preferred postfix or sendmail.
I switched to postfix 3 years ago, and never looked back.
I came across a link *
On 03/10/2013 11:12 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2013-03-11, Austin Einter austin.ein...@gmail.com wrote:
Which one is preferred postfix or sendmail.
I suspect this is mostly personal preference. I prefer postfix because
the configuration files are easier to read and write.
It says I need to
On 03/11/2013 01:05 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Hi all
I get a Cisco 1841 router, connecting the office through a CHAP PPPoE link:
[...]
interface Dialer1
ip address negotiated
ip mtu 1492
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
encapsulation ppp
ip tcp adjust-mss
On 03/08/2013 08:07 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Harold Pritchett har...@uga.edu wrote:
On 3/7/2013 10:10 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:54:59PM -0500, Harold Pritchett wrote:
What other information do I need which may be available?
What
On 03/08/2013 09:21 AM, Harold Pritchett wrote:
On 3/8/2013 8:57 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 03/08/2013 08:07 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Harold Pritchett har...@uga.edu wrote:
On 3/7/2013 10:10 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:54:59PM
On 03/07/2013 01:57 PM, John Beranek wrote:
On 06/03/2013 20:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
In my testing of HIP, there is reference to use 'nc6' for a simple TCP
character echo server. No such animal in Centos, and after a bit of
digging I find this refers to Netcat6 which seems to be a dead
On 03/07/2013 02:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 03/07/2013 01:57 PM, John Beranek wrote:
On 06/03/2013 20:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
In my testing of HIP, there is reference to use 'nc6' for a simple TCP
character
I can't get nc to do anything worthwhile. In fact I can't even get the
examples in the manpage to work. From either my C6 servers or my F17
notebooks. For example:
echo -n GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n | nc medon.htt-consult.com 80
Gets no response. And looking into the access.log of medon shows
On 03/07/2013 05:06 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I can't get nc to do anything worthwhile. In fact I can't even get the
examples in the manpage to work. From either my C6 servers or my F17
notebooks. For example:
echo -n GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n | nc
On 03/07/2013 06:30 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2013-03-07, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 03/07/2013 05:06 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I can't get nc to do anything worthwhile. In fact I can't even get the
examples in the manpage
On 03/07/2013 10:10 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:54:59PM -0500, Harold Pritchett wrote:
What other information do I need which may be available?
What does 'vgscan' say? 'vgchange -a y' ?
After the 'vchange -a y' you 'ls /dev/LVM_GRP_NAME/' to get the mount
points
On 03/07/2013 10:54 PM, Harold Pritchett wrote:
On 3/7/2013 10:10 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:54:59PM -0500, Harold Pritchett wrote:
What other information do I need which may be available?
What does 'vgscan' say? 'vgchange -a y' ?
[root@mickey www]# vgscan
So I have this nice, simple web server up running. Its purpose is to
allow me external testing with HIP, and to provide some files for
external distribution. Of course, there it is sitting on port 80 and
the attacks are coming in per logwatch report. Examples from the report
include:
I pulled one of my old OQO model 2 out of the junk bin and installed
Centos 6.3 over Centos 5.3.
The internal video does not work in graphics mode (text works fine),
though a monitor attacked to the VGA port works fine. Although my
intension is to use this as a portable test server, it would
On 03/06/2013 02:51 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Mar 6, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I pulled one of my old OQO model 2 out of the junk bin and installed
Centos 6.3 over Centos 5.3.
The internal video does not work in graphics mode (text works fine),
though a monitor attacked
In my testing of HIP, there is reference to use 'nc6' for a simple TCP
character echo server. No such animal in Centos, and after a bit of
digging I find this refers to Netcat6 which seems to be a dead app? Is
it available as an rpm somewhere for Centos? My searching is coming up
empty. Or
On 03/06/2013 03:47 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 03/06/2013 02:51 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Mar 6, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I pulled one of my old OQO model 2 out of the junk bin and installed
On 03/06/2013 04:18 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 03/06/2013 03:47 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
On 03/06/2013 02:51 PM, Craig White wrote
My old Centos 5.5 servers had a /root/.forward to send things like
logwatch to this email account. It did not take any special
configuration in sendmail for this to work.
Now Centos 6.3 is using postfix (as we well know, and generally I am
happy for this) and I have set up the /root/.forward
the aliases
path, then. thanks.
Craig
On Mar 4, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
My old Centos 5.5 servers had a /root/.forward to send things like
logwatch to this email account. It did not take any special
configuration in sendmail for this to work.
Now Centos 6.3 is using
this...
using a '.forward' has been out of vogue for many years
Craig
On Mar 4, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
My old Centos 5.5 servers had a /root/.forward to send things like
logwatch to this email account. It did not take any special
configuration in sendmail for this to work
On 03/04/2013 11:03 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 03/04/2013 10:29 AM, Craig White wrote:
You should set e-mail address for root in /etc/aliases and then issue
command 'postman /etc/aliases' to alert postfix to the changes.
# postman /etc/aliases
-bash: postman: command not found
Use
, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
On 03/04/2013 10:29 AM, Craig White wrote:
You should set e-mail address for root in /etc/aliases and then issue
command 'postman /etc/aliases' to alert postfix to the changes.
# postman /etc/aliases
-bash: postman: command not found
you should
On 03/04/2013 11:32 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 03/04/2013 11:13 AM, Craig White wrote:
yeah - that probably works too.
and sorry for the typo… seems that Apple Mail helpfully autocorrects
spelling which changed postmap to postman so quickly I never noticed. I
I am trying to recall back at least 2 years, and my notes are poor, and
my searching appears to be worst...
Seems I recall that last when I set up my apache server, the spammers
were posting to it so it would send out the spam on port 25. There was
some conf that I did to block this, but I
In the packages section of my kickstart I have:
-avahi
and I am still getting avahi and all of its rpms installed. I don't
want avahi on my servers, how do I specify in a kickstart to NOT install it?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 03/03/2013 04:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.03.2013 22:30, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
I am trying to recall back at least 2 years, and my notes are poor, and
my searching appears to be worst...
Seems I recall that last when I set up my apache server, the spammers
were posting
On 03/03/2013 04:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.03.2013 22:35, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
In the packages section of my kickstart I have:
-avahi
and I am still getting avahi and all of its rpms installed. I don't
want avahi on my servers, how do I specify in a kickstart to NOT install
On 03/03/2013 04:37 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 3/3/2013 1:30 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Seems I recall that last when I set up my apache server, the spammers
were posting to it so it would send out the spam on port 25. There was
some conf that I did to block this, but I did not document
On 03/03/2013 04:39 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Am 03.03.2013 22:30, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
I am trying to recall back at least 2 years, and my notes are poor, and
my searching appears to be worst...
Seems I recall that last when I set up my apache server, the spammers
were posting
On 03/03/2013 04:58 PM, zGreenfelder wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:37 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 3/3/2013 1:30 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Seems I recall that last when I set up my apache server, the spammers
were posting to it so it would send out the spam on port 25
On 03/03/2013 05:06 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Am 03.03.2013 22:49, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
There was an attack, and if you search you will find references to it,
where the spammers post to your web server in such a way that they relay
out port 25. They send to your port 80, but you send
On 03/03/2013 05:28 PM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
On 03/03/2013 04:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.03.2013 22:35, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
In the packages section of my kickstart I have:
-avahi
and I am still
On 03/03/2013 05:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.03.2013 22:49, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 03/03/2013 04:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.03.2013 22:30, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
I am trying to recall back at least 2 years, and my notes are poor, and
my searching appears to be worst
On 03/03/2013 05:46 PM, Joseph Spenner wrote:
On 03/03/2013 05:06 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Am 03.03.2013 22:49, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
There was an attack, and if you search you will find references to it,
where the spammers post to your web server in such a way that they relay
out
On 03/01/2013 05:03 PM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
Am 01.03.2013 17:39, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 03/01/2013 11:25 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
Am 01.03.2013 16:56, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
[...]
Is anyone here running bind on their server and can run this command
from the server? If you
I am having problems with EDNS support on a few Centos 6.3 bind
servers. I am trying to determine if the problem is my Juniper SSG5
firewall of Centos.
All the servers have firewall enabled, though I have tested with
stopping iptables and ip6tables. I am using tests from:
On 03/01/2013 11:25 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
Am 01.03.2013 16:56, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
I am having problems with EDNS support on a few Centos 6.3 bind
servers. I am trying to determine if the problem is my Juniper SSG5
firewall of Centos.
All the servers have firewall enabled, though
Continuing to 'clean up' my new server by reviewing logged messages.
Researching a common one:
Feb 26 07:30:29 onlo named[19336]: error (unexpected RCODE SERVFAIL)
resolving 'foo.com/MX/IN': 1.2.3.4#53
I get the drift that my server has been directed to a 'lame server' and
logs that fact.
This was ment for the bind-users list. But if anyone has an answer, it
would be greatly welcomed. Afterall, this is from my bind app on my
Centos server.
Original Message
Subject:disabling lame server logging
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:35:44 -0500
From: Robert
On 02/26/2013 01:19 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Will the VNC server allow remote logins as root?
From root did you run vncpasswd to create the needed /root.vnc/ files?
Yes, I did. I see a /root/.vnc directory with a log, pid, passwd, and
xstartup
files.
Any suggestions?
And your
On 02/26/2013 01:36 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Robert:
And your /etc/sysconfig/vncserver has something like;
VNCSERVERS=1:foo 2:root
and you are attempting to connect to 5902 for the root user (compared to
5901 for user foo)?
Yes.
This is strange. I just ran vncpasswd as root again and I
On a system I just built and installed fresh from base and update I am
getting warnings in httpd/error.log about
mod_wsgi: Compiled for Python/2.6.2
mod_wsgi: Runtime using Python/2.6.6
Just a 'warning'. What to do?
___
CentOS mailing list
I have read a couple old threads here on updates for servers, and I am
looking for some mechanics to getting the actual updates done. I don't
want automatic updates; I want to control when and what gets updated.
First I have to determine that a particular server needs updates. I
suppose a
On 02/25/2013 09:03 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.02.2013 14:48, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
I have read a couple old threads here on updates for servers, and I am
looking for some mechanics to getting the actual updates done. I don't
want automatic updates; I want to control when and what
On 02/25/2013 09:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have read a couple old threads here on updates for servers, and I am
looking for some mechanics to getting the actual updates done. I don't
want automatic updates; I want to control when and what gets updated.
Yeah
On 02/25/2013 10:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 02/25/2013 09:03 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.02.2013 14:48, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
I have read a couple old threads here on updates for servers, and I am
looking for some mechanics to getting the actual updates
On 02/25/2013 09:03 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 02/25/2013 02:48 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So redirect the output into a file and when the return code is 100
mail that file to the admin.
Then there is the actual update. I learned long ago NOT to run yum over
an SSH connection
On 02/25/2013 11:21 AM, Jerry Franz wrote:
On 02/25/2013 08:06 AM, aurfalien wrote:
Hi,
Has any one had problems with mail clients were your DNS is like this;
doman.comMX 50 mail.domain.com
domain.com MX 100 mail2.domain.com
domain.com CNAME www.domain.com
The
On 02/25/2013 11:33 AM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Hello everyone:
I tried following the instructions on this page to set up a VNC
server:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/VNC-Server
I can telnet to port 5901 from the machine itself:
# telnet 127.0.0.1 5901
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to
On 02/25/2013 12:50 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:41 AM, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote:
This is where you need something like Katello or Spacewalk. These are
management systems which look after managing your infrastructure in such a
way that you can view what
On 02/25/2013 01:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
I have read a couple old threads here on updates for servers, and I am
looking for some mechanics to getting the actual updates done. I don't
want automatic updates; I
On 02/25/2013 01:15 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Is there some default setting in the vncserver that I need to change to
allow outside
connections?
And what about iptables?
I have iptables and selinux turned off currently.
It still will not connect.
Any other ideas?
All I ever do is install
On 02/25/2013 02:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.02.2013 19:35, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
For example, an apache update MAY require that I first check what it
will do to http.conf.
NOT ON RHEL/CENTOS
there are no major upgrades with changing API/ABI/Config
that is why it is called
On 02/25/2013 07:55 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Hey everyone:
I got it working. I set it up under a user account.
I was trying to set it up with the root account.
It is working with the user account.
Will the VNC server allow remote logins as root?
I would answer you offlist on this one,
On 02/25/2013 07:55 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Hey everyone:
I got it working. I set it up under a user account.
I was trying to set it up with the root account.
It is working with the user account.
Will the VNC server allow remote logins as root?
From root did you run vncpasswd to create
On 02/24/2013 06:39 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
Am 22.02.2013 21:10, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 02/22/2013 03:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.02.2013 20:58, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
Once before (5+ years back) I had to add a kernel param and did it wrong
and
it was a big recovery
On 02/21/2013 06:55 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 2/21/2013 3:20 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
:Hardware name: HP Compaq dc7800 Small Form Factor
...
Should I worry?
yes.
You should update bios .
hmmm, thats a 2007 vintage economy business desktop ?
looks to be a December 2011 rev 1.32A
On 02/22/2013 01:38 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 2/21/2013 12:43 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
:[Firmware Warn]: Your BIOS is broken; DMAR reported at address fed9
returns all ones!
I googled Your BIOS is broken; DMAR reported at address fed9
returns all ones! and got some related
On 02/22/2013 02:32 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.02.2013 20:28, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
on a similar/identical bug with Fedora FC17, someone suggested booting
with iommu=off to work around this.
Where do I add this?
like every other kernel param in /boot/grub/grub.conf at
the end
On 02/22/2013 03:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.02.2013 20:58, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
Kernel param. I really should have caught that.
So I was all ready to edit grub.conf and then slapped my hand.
You TEST it out first, adding the command at boot time. ARGH!
one option
Once
On 02/21/2013 04:30 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
On 21 February 2013 01:28, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my
new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and TCP. Firewall was OK.
In fact a local system
On 02/20/2013 08:28 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my
new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and TCP. Firewall was OK.
In fact a local system on the same subnet, thus NOT going through my
firewall was denied access
On 02/21/2013 10:16 AM, David G. Miller wrote:
Robert Moskowitz rgm@... writes:
It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my
new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and TCP. Firewall was OK.
In fact a local system on the same subnet, thus NOT going through
I have read that v 6.3 is about Fedora 12. Now that v 6.4 has shipped
(no I won't be dumb enough to ask when C6.4 we ship), what version of
Fedora does it match up with?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
I am getting the following on my 'new box' for my DNS server:
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:58:04 -0500
From:
To:
Subject: [abrt] full crash report
User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08
abrt_version: 2.0.8
cmdline:ro root=/dev/mapper/vg_onlo3-root_01 rd_NO_LUKS
On 02/21/2013 03:30 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 02/21/2013 03:27 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have read that v 6.3 is about Fedora 12. Now that v 6.4 has shipped
(no I won't be dumb enough to ask when C6.4 we ship), what version of
Fedora does it match up with?
It's not changed. Think of y
On 02/21/2013 04:46 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 02/21/2013 02:45 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 02/21/2013 03:30 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 02/21/2013 03:27 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have read that v 6.3 is about Fedora 12. Now that v 6.4 has shipped
(no I won't be dumb enough to ask when
On 02/21/2013 06:13 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2013/2/21 Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com:
I am getting the following on my 'new box' for my DNS server:
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:58:04 -0500
From:
To:
Subject: [abrt] full crash report
User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08
On 02/21/2013 06:55 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 2/21/2013 3:20 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
:Hardware name: HP Compaq dc7800 Small Form Factor
...
Should I worry?
yes.
You should update bios .
hmmm, thats a 2007 vintage economy business desktop ?
looks to be a December 2011 rev 1.32A
501 - 600 of 1395 matches
Mail list logo
