Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64

2.6.32- > 642.el6.x86_64 > > On May 27, 2016, at 1:42 AM, Sorin Srbu <sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se> wrote: > > The one I posted a screen dump of earlier. > > I don’t see any posts of a screen dump. The mailing list software (mailman) > is > set to strip any non

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Sorin Srbu > Sent: den 27 maj 2016 07:43 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-

Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64

2.6.32- > 642.el6.x86_64 > > On Thu, 26 May 2016, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > > Uninstalled NFS, as it wasn't needed anyway. > > > > Still got the panic. > > Seriously, what panic? The one I posted a screen dump of earlier. -- //Sorin ___

Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64

2.6.32- > 642.el6.x86_64 > > Sorin Srbu wrote: > >> Behalf Of Johnny Hughes > >> Sent: den 26 maj 2016 14:30 > >> > >> If lockd is failling to start: > >> > >> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10927 > > > > Uninstalled NFS,

Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Johnny Hughes > Sent: den 26 maj 2016 14:30 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32- > 642.el6.x86_64 > > If lockd is failling to

Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Subscriber > Sent: den 26 maj 2016 13:32 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32- > 642.el6.x86_64 > > Im

Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Johnny Hughes > Sent: den 26 maj 2016 12:39 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32- > 642.el6.x86_64 > > Did you see it in every

Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John Hodrien > Sent: den 26 maj 2016 11:14 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32- > 642.el6.x86_64 > > >

[CentOS] Kernel panic on 6.8 release with kernel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64

--- # Sorin Srbu, Sysadmin # Uppsala University # Dept of Medicinal Chemistry # Div of Org Pharm Chem # Box 574 # SE-75123 Uppsala # Sweden # # Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 # Visit: BMC, Husargatan 3, D5:512b # Web: http://www.orgfarm.uu.se

Re: [CentOS] Upcoming OwnCloud changes

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of James Hogarth > Sent: den 23 maj 2016 08:54 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upcoming OwnCloud changes > > On 23 M

Re: [CentOS] Upcoming OwnCloud changes

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Chuck Munro > Sent: den 22 maj 2016 17:11 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upcoming OwnCloud changes > > > Just a FYI folks ... > > I am running OwnCloud 9.0.2 on

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Phelps, Matthew > Sent: den 18 april 2016 14:34 > To: Karanbir Singh > Cc: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Nux! > Sent: den 7 april 2016 18:09 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > Indeed, it's pretty new AFAIK and I am as

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Lamar Owen > Sent: den 7 april 2016 16:21 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > It does take more disk space to do this.

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Nux! > Sent: den 7 april 2016 15:04 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > Well, by the looks of it, it bundles all the

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - > > From: "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se> > > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org> > > Sent: Thursday, 7 April, 2016 10:02:42 > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Opensh

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Sorin Srbu > Sent: den 14 mars 2016 07:31 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > > >&

Re: [CentOS] Centos in the Browser string ?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of g > Sent: den 24 mars 2016 17:22 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos in the Browser string ? > > > now i goofed. :-\ > > > if you have file "user.js" in profile

Re: [CentOS] Centos in the Browser string ?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of g > Sent: den 24 mars 2016 16:56 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos in the Browser string ? > > if you have a file in profile directory, add this to it. if not, >

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Chris Beattie > Sent: den 11 mars 2016 16:53 > To: 'CentOS mailing list' > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > On 3/11/2016 2:02 AM, Sorin

Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Akemi Yagi > Sent: den 10 mars 2016 20:27 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > > > > Looks like installing openshot 2.x on C7 isn't as

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Akemi Yagi > Sent: den 3 mars 2016 08:20 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:05

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us > Sent: den 29 februari 2016 19:50 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away > > Because I was looking late Friday afternoon,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John Hodrien > Sent: den 29 februari 2016 17:55 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2, nouveau won't go away > > > Fully updated 7.2 system. I installed the

Re: [CentOS] Utility to zero unused blocks on disk

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of EGO-II.1 > Sent: den 9 februari 2016 09:00 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Utility to zero unused blocks on disk > > > > >> the only truly safe way to destroy data on

Re: [CentOS] In A UEFI World, "rm -rf /" Can Brick Your System

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us > Sent: den 1 februari 2016 20:34 > To: CentOS > Subject: [CentOS] In A UEFI World, "rm -rf /" Can Brick Your System > > As a public service announcement, recursively

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Peter Duffy > Sent: den 26 januari 2016 13:16 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent > > reminds me of first installing windows 95 (by the > choice of my

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Richard > Sent: den 25 januari 2016 16:19 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6? > > > You're just seeing this now on a 6.7 system? I don't

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Leon Fauster > Sent: den 25 januari 2016 17:03 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6? > > > upstream provide a EL6 supplementary repository with

[CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

on CentOS and how to get around this problem? Are the views on this matter still infected? I'm not looking forward to go back to the sluggish Firefox. 8-/ -- BW, Sorin --- # Sorin Srbu, Sysadmin # Uppsala University # Dept of

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of John Hodrien > Sent: den 24 januari 2016 12:47 > To: CentOS mailing list > Cc: Mark LaPierre > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent > > My opinion is that there's a silent majority

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome Issues on CentOS 6

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Richard > Sent: den 20 oktober 2015 18:52 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome Issues on CentOS 6 > > On a centos-7 machine where I was having this issue,

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome Issues on CentOS 6

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Tim Evans > Sent: den 20 oktober 2015 14:46 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome Issues on CentOS 6 > > > I was seeing issues like that on centos-7 with a

Re: [CentOS] Oracle java RPM

> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu > Sent: den 4 september 2015 21:22 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Oracle java RPM > > On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 16:16 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto

Re: [CentOS] new laptop: DVD or Blu-ray

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Chris Yereaztian Sent: den 21 augusti 2015 19:53 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] new laptop: DVD or Blu-ray Ken, I'm sorry, I had no intention of fighting anyone. I was

Re: [CentOS] new laptop: DVD or Blu-ray

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of ken Sent: den 20 augusti 2015 19:27 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] new laptop: DVD or Blu-ray I'm suprised no one yet has mentioned authoring movies. Maybe the

Re: [CentOS] new laptop: DVD or Blu-ray

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Chris Yereaztian Sent: den 21 augusti 2015 10:29 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] new laptop: DVD or Blu-ray Sorin, authoring a movie usually refers to actually creating

Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us Sent: den 29 juni 2015 17:25 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server The WiFi solution I use still

Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Gordon Messmer Sent: den 29 juni 2015 19:40 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server On 06/29/2015 06:46 AM, Sorin Srbu

Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of James B. Byrne Sent: den 29 juni 2015 15:10 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server Please note: I'm not

Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu Sent: den 29 juni 2015 08:11 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server -Original Message- From

Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Max Pyziur Sent: den 28 juni 2015 20:50 To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server I'm rebuilding a machine to function as a

Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce Sent: den 29 juni 2015 08:29 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server On 6/28/2015 11:11 PM, Sorin Srbu

Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce Sent: den 29 juni 2015 09:03 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server On 6/28/2015 11:50 PM, Sorin Srbu

Re: [CentOS] NUX Skype for Linux

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us Sent: den 16 juni 2015 20:59 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] NUX Skype for Linux I had cause to install the Skype for Linux package from the NUX repo.

Re: [CentOS] NUX Skype for Linux

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of James B. Byrne Sent: den 16 juni 2015 14:55 To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] NUX Skype for Linux I had cause to install the Skype for Linux package from the NUX repo. I

Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu Sent: den 11 maj 2015 07:49 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution Main Config: Schedule: FullPeriod: 27.9

Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce Sent: den 11 maj 2015 08:19 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution On 5/10/2015 11:03 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: How did you get away

Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce Sent: den 11 maj 2015 09:25 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution On 5/10/2015 11:57 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: expletive. Why can't

Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce Sent: den 8 maj 2015 17:12 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution On 5/7/2015 11:44 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: May I ask what your

Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce Sent: den 7 maj 2015 19:09 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution my year of monthlies and month of dailies of 25 servers has been more

Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Timothy Murphy Sent: den 7 maj 2015 23:21 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution The worst thing about BackupPC is the insane error message Unable

Re: [CentOS] Nvidia Mod Update

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ned Slider Sent: den 8 februari 2015 12:12 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia Mod Update Yes, just to reiterate: yum erase kmod-nvidia yum install

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh Sent: den 22 januari 2015 18:20 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6 its been withdrawn upstream. given the level of interest in

Re: [CentOS] Is anyone using C7 in production yet? (sssd, nss-pam-ldapd, kerberos, etc)

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Fred Smith Sent: den 21 januari 2015 16:35 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Is anyone using C7 in production yet? (sssd, nss-pam- ldapd, kerberos, etc) Can't say as I

Re: [CentOS] Is anyone using C7 in production yet? (sssd, nss-pam-ldapd, kerberos, etc)

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Gordon Messmer Sent: den 21 januari 2015 05:47 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Is anyone using C7 in production yet? (sssd, nss-pam- ldapd, kerberos, etc) On

Re: [CentOS] Is anyone using C7 in production yet? (sssd, nss-pam-ldapd, kerberos, etc)

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Fred Smith Sent: den 21 januari 2015 15:35 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Is anyone using C7 in production yet? (sssd, nss-pam- ldapd, kerberos, etc) Before I fire up

Re: [CentOS] Hardware raid LSI Megaraid not working since Centos 6.6

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE Sent: den 14 januari 2015 14:16 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Hardware raid LSI Megaraid not working since Centos 6.6 Le 05/01/2015 16:14,

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru Chiscan Sent: den 28 december 2014 16:22 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients Hey, ktorrent looks pretty good! Thanks for the hint! Maybe

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eliezer Croitoru Sent: den 28 december 2014 16:25 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just wondering to

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Martin Cigorraga Sent: den 28 december 2014 18:44 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients Did you try Transmission? You can install just the daemon

[CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

Hi all, Just switched my home computer from Windows 7 to CentOS 6.6 and I'm having a slight bit of trouble with the bittorrent-clients. * Transmission is fine but lacks a bit in features. * Vuze is my preferred bt-client but gives me horrendous gfx-artifacts, like not showing the torrent

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

Isn't that a KDE-specific program? Works with Gnome as well? //Sorin Sent from my tablet, please excuse the brevity. Alexandru Chiscan l...@easterng.ro wrote: ktorrent Lec ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

With ktorrent? No idea. Didn't even think of checking that one out. //Sorin Sent from my tablet, please excuse the brevity. Jeff Allison jeff.alli...@allygray.2y.net wrote: What's missing? On 28/12/2014 8:30 pm, Alexandru Chiscan l...@easterng.ro wrote: ktorrent Lec

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

packages for Deluge in my nux-dextop repo if it helps you. Also check rtorrent out. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se To: (centos@centos.org) centos@centos.org Sent: Sunday, 28

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

...@centos.org [centos-boun...@centos.org] on behalf of Jeff Allison [jeff.alli...@allygray.2y.net] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2014 14:11 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients No I meant Transmission. On 28 December 2014 at 22:15, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote

Re: [CentOS] Bittorrent clients

Later Deluge versions seem to need a newer python than available in CentOS-Base.repo. 8-/ I'm not sure I dare replace the current python, as I believe yum is dependent on python. Maybe I'll just stick with Transmission and the Deluge from Epel. Thanks guys for your hints and help for now! --

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

Hey, ktorrent looks pretty good! Thanks for the hint! -- /Sorin From: centos-boun...@centos.org [centos-boun...@centos.org] on behalf of Alexandru Chiscan [l...@easterng.ro] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2014 10:30 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re:

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

: Bittorrent clients My versions quite old but you can change the sort order to all of those things, the trackers etc are visible in the inspector. There's no columns, but it's not that kind of GUI. On 29 December 2014 at 00:47, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote: Oh, well, there's no coulmns

Re: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients

the required libraries. The same is true for gnome programs. LEC - Reply message - From: Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se To: Centos centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] OT: Bittorrent clients Date: Sun, Dec 28, 2014 13:14 Isn't that a KDE-specific program? Works with Gnome as well

Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6?

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Niki Kovacs Sent: den 15 december 2014 07:28 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6? I just tested this on a fresh installation of CentOS 6.6 (in

Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6?

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu Sent: den 15 december 2014 11:12 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6? I just tested this on a fresh installation of CentOS 6.6

Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6?

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Chris Sent: den 15 december 2014 19:57 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6? On 12/15/2014 12:52 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: Ran into the same problem

Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6?

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Niki Kovacs Sent: den 11 december 2014 08:55 To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6? I just spent a couple of unnerving hours trying to make Dropbox work on

Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6?

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Niki Kovacs Sent: den 11 december 2014 11:32 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dropbox on CentOS 6? Le 11/12/2014 10:58, Liam O'Toole a écrit : That procedure works for

[CentOS] Slow access from Windows 7 to samba share on CentOS 6.6 after upgrade

. -- BW, Sorin --- # Sorin Srbu, Sysadmin # Uppsala University # Dept of Medicinal Chemistry # Div of Org Pharm Chem # Box 574 # SE-75123 Uppsala # Sweden # # Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 # Visit: BMC, Husargatan 3, D5:512b # Web

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.6 is Released

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Hughes Sent: den 28 oktober 2014 17:17 To: CentOS ML Subject: [CentOS] CentOS-6.6 is Released Just letting everyone here know, CentOS-6.6 is now released:

Re: [CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Miller Sent: den 20 mars 2014 20:49 To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore? Does anyone use tcp wrappers

Re: [CentOS] Booting Software RAID

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Always Learning Sent: den 29 januari 2014 20:36 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Booting Software RAID My (sometimes unpopular) advice is to set up the partitions on

Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Hass Sent: den 29 januari 2014 08:47 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not? Hi friend - what is your end goal with this effort to obtain security with

Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Hass Sent: den 29 januari 2014 09:49 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not? Good call - not sure how far your coding goes and with what/how languages and

Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Hass Sent: den 29 januari 2014 11:11 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not? Almost forgot, //Sorin: SSL uses public key cryptography: 1. You (or your

[CentOS] NIS or not?

user accounts and passwords in one place, with one place only to administrate. NIS seems to be able to do that. Comments and insights are much appreciated! -- BW, Sorin --- # Sorin Srbu, Sysadmin # Uppsala University # Dept

Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?

which we serve mail-wise we use the objectclasses: objectClass: qmailControl objectClass: top We also have developed an LDAP via Web Interface, which we use exclusively for LDAP administration. We have two LDAP servers, syncronized via syncrepl. suomi On 2014-01-28 10:02, Sorin Srbu

Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Darod Zyree Sent: den 28 januari 2014 13:00 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not? Use IPA. It combines LDAP with Kerberos, a server-client environment is easily

Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of anax Sent: den 28 januari 2014 13:45 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not? Hi Sorin of course: you may omit the mail cocacho and realize only the authentication

Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Pete Geenhuizen Sent: den 28 januari 2014 14:12 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not? I used NIS for many years while working on Sun Solaris and it worked

Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Kaplan, Andrew H. Sent: den 28 januari 2014 14:31 To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not? We have been using NIS for over a decade on our network, and it has been

Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Logan McNaughton Sent: den 28 januari 2014 14:33 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not? Where I work we use NIS + Kerberos (Active Directory). We have about 150

Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Mauricio Tavares Sent: den 28 januari 2014 15:20 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not? We do have Active Directory as well, but only for the Windows clients.

Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us Sent: den 28 januari 2014 17:09 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not? Hmm, yes. It would seem most everybody recomends Kerberos. Will have to

Re: [CentOS] Single sign-on for CentOS-6

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of James B. Byrne Sent: den 28 januari 2014 18:13 To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Single sign-on for CentOS-6 Does anyone here use a Samba4 setup for single sign-on for MS_Win

Re: [CentOS] mail tools preferences?

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Gary Greene Sent: den 18 januari 2014 00:59 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] mail tools preferences? That said, I've had more issues with Evolution with it trashing the

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Yves Bellefeuille Sent: den 8 januari 2014 01:36 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat With great excitement I'd

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Hughes Sent: den 8 januari 2014 11:54 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat Karanbir Singh (the Chair of the

Re: [CentOS] Centos-compatible motherboards

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce Sent: den 26 december 2013 05:05 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos-compatible motherboards See:https://hardware.redhat.com/RHEL6 that listing is

Re: [CentOS] grub color on C6 (not)

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ted Miller Sent: den 17 december 2013 05:19 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] grub color on C6 (not) I have tried more than half a dozen different combinations of the color

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Johan Vermeulen Sent: den 12 december 2013 10:44 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public just installed it in Vurtualbox. That went fine. I did that

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh Sent: den 11 december 2013 16:56 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public Hi, http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/ Go get it (

Re: [CentOS] Third-party SATA-RAID cards suggestions

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce Sent: den 6 december 2013 08:32 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Third-party SATA-RAID cards suggestions I see several of you guys say that the Megaraid as

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >