--- On Sat, 2/7/11, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
That's not been supported in, literally, ages. You
may want to consider
a yum update once in a while.
And yes, that specific version has multiple known and
exploitable
security issues.
John
I'm running it on
Hi Guys,
I'm looking at php php-5.1.6-3.el4s1.10.i386.rpm in the CentOS plus repo dated
from 31st July 2008. Is it vulnerable from the exploits in php 5.1.x and 5.2?
Thanks,
Spike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Upstream released 4.8 on 18th May 2009. Here is the announcement for those who
missed it.
http://press.redhat.com/2009/05/18/red-hat-enterprise-linux-4-8-now-available/
When can we expect CentOS 4.8? When it is ready? Soon?
Thanks
Spike.
---
MHR wrote:
I've heard now from more than one source about problems
with CentOS
(and RH) at least up through 5.2 w.r.t. SATA drive
handling, and I've
even reported on this myself in this list before.
My question is, do we have any idea if 5.3 has any
improvements in this area?
One of
Eduardo Silvestre wrote:
i have some customers with php 5.1.6 and they have a
problem because this version have a bug on gd library.
Link http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=39366
Need install other version to use this feature.
Regards,
Don't assume that because the bug is in php
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
My mails had *three* locations in it where you can download
php 5.2 if
you need that.
There is no evidence supplied by yourself or by the OP that
upstream have not backported a fix to an issue 2 years old.
As the saying goes if its not in bugzilla its not a bug.
Lanny Marcus wrote:
I believe Johnny's words were very well chosen,
accurate, excellent
and to the point. He and the other CentOS Developers should
know how
much 99% of the CentOS user base appreciate their hard
work, time and
dedication to this project. Very rare for us to see Johnny
Johnny Hughes wrote:
It is not about you ... please stop bring a complete ass.
I edit the CentOS main page ... and you know what, there
are only so
many hours in a day, where I have to do $work so I can eat
and pay for
my house, as well as spend 40-60 hours a week on a free
project so
Tru Huynh wrote:
welcome to my kill file, I have not taken my
medication so i may be unstable
Tru you need to find your tru calling. Meanwhile
take your medication and try this
dd if=/dev/zero of=/killfile bs=1024 count=1048576
Spike.
___
William L. Maltby wrote:
Folks,
I fully understand the emotional need to respond to one who
throws
around terms like Communist,
Tyrannical, etc. even if ostensibly
framed as a rhetorical question. Certain terms and phrases
are by nature
pejorative and I;m sure the OP knew this when he
R P Herrold wrote:
yada, yada, grumble, mumble
You know after all this time the CentOS frontpage
is still showing out of date info. You and Ralph
could have stopped wasting time and simply edited
the link to 4.7 instead of 4.4 as is the case now.
Is the C in CentOS supposed to be Community
Niki Kovacs wrote:
I know I know: upstream minus artwork. Nevertheless, I
admit I'd like to
simply use the RHEL background wallpaper for my desktop.
Something like:
http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/linux/images/rhel4/44-Desktop.jpg
Can't seem to find these (4 and 5). Any idea?
Is
Niki Kovacs wrote:
So let me insist: I want *that* specific wallpaper.
On *my* desktop.
Would you like your wallpaper with cream and
sugar as well? 1-800-WALLPAPER.
Spike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
ann kok wrote:
We are difficult to get rpm in our system running redhat
enterpirse
Can you use the centos rpm to install in redhat
eneterprise?
What rpm are you trying to install? Care to give more details?
There could be an rpm for RHEL/CentOS in one of the 3rd party
repos.
ARe they
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Spike Turner wrote:
Perhaps with the release of the CentOS 4.7 Server CD
the frontpage at www.centos.org could be updated to
reflect this new development rather than 4.4?
In cases like this - could you open a bug at
http://bugs.centos.org/?
I'll take
Gopinath Achari wrote:
Hi all,
I need Koffice-kivio package for centos
5.2 (i386)
I downloaded this package from kde.org site. when i
installed. It
generated lots of dependency errors even though the
dependency packages
are installed
please Help me out . I need kivio ( Equivalent to
Scott Silva wrote:
I think the problem is that the volunteer that created the
CD and announced it
isn't the same volunteer that updates the website.
Volunteers usually have varying amounts of free time.
I would have thought that updating the website, wikis etc
should be delegated to
Akemi Yagi wrote:
Eh? If you are saying that the Fedora forum is a success
and the
CentOS forums are a failure, then I would certainly
disagree.
I would like to point out that, although I am helping the
CentOS
project as one of the forum moderators, I have been
participating in
Scott Silva wrote:
I don't expect up to the minute changes here, because
... frankly... You get
what you pay for. And since most users of CentOS aren't
paying, the developers
have to keep day jobs for those luxuries like food and
heat, a roof over their
heads, etc...
Interesting. Yet
James Fidell wrote:
I see an update for the CentOS4 kernel, to 2.6.9-78.0.5.EL,
has appeared over the weekend. I've not seen anything on the
announce list for it though. Have I missed something?
The kernels were actually in the updates directory on the
same date as they were released
Duncan wrote:
Yum install mysql-server
There are many tutorials on teh web for getting LAMP on CentOS
5 specifically and this is a cut and paste from one of them :-
Install Required Packages :-
Enter yum install mysql mysql-devel mysql-server to download and
install MySQL then Enter
Niki Kovacs wrote:
Given the popularity of this thread, I suggest creating a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list, where folks can discuss
list-related stuff.
Popular huh? Let as see some stats on the
posts by user
* Karanbir Singh (15)
* Spike Turner (10)
* Spiro Harvey (8)
* Kenneth Price (5)
* Frank
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Fedora I used to use djvulibre package for djvu files,
but I cannot seem to find this in any CentOS repositores out
there. Google also does not help, nor searching list
archives. :-(
I have found the .rpm file for RHEL 4, but when I tried to
install it (hoping
Akemi Yagi wrote:
Spike Turner wrote:
Who would like the mailing list to be as fragmented
as the CentOS forum? Fragmentation means erosion of
the userbase and is not good for the community.
Spike.
Once again you are referring to the CentOS forum. Are you
saying that
the forums
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
So yum does not help here, or I need another repository
which has djvulibre package for CentOS 5.2, or some other
way to be able to view djvu files. Please give some advise
on this.
A quick glance at the kbs repo http://centos.karan.org/
shows an rpm in testing
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Over a period of time, we would like to see the CentOS list
become a
more user help and distro specific list, with generic
conversations
moving to the centos-tech list.
perhaps that is why core issues in CentOS like the kernel
and samba are ignored by the
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I agree with all you said and I think that a distinction
along the lines
of how one uses CentOS might indeed help, say
centos-server-users and
centos-desktop-users or a list that is just about hardware
and making it
work with CentOS.
Out of curiosity which major
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Thats a bit of a dribveby waste of space post that does not
really merit
a reply from anyone. Also if that was something that
concerns you so
much, what have you done about it ?
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/066154.html
Johnny has been
Spiro Harvey wrote:
well, if they're running Gnome, then they're
probably not using the
machine in an enterprise capacity. nobody in
their right mind would
install X on a server.
Really? What about SLED (Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop) or
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop? Read something
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Out of curiosity which major linux distro operates
a fragmented mailing list such as the one proposed?
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
http://lists.debian.org/completeindex.html
https://lists.ubuntu.com/
https://ml.mandriva.net/wws/lists
Compared to
William L. Maltby wrote:
Since CentOS has not announced them yet, I would guess that
is the case.
There would also be a small delay while the mirrors get
synchronized.
This appears to be the upstream details on the kernel
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0859.html
Even after a
Upstream bugzilla says :-
Rebasing to Samba 3.0.32 would fix various current RHEL4 bugs.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460904
I have looked at the bugs.centos.org but did not find
user reported bugs.
Is anyone experiencing problems using the CentOS 4 samba?
Spike.
Rene Fournier wrote:
From: Rene Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CentOS] Good [L]AMP tutorial for CentOS 5.2 ?
To: centos@centos.org
Date: Saturday, October 11, 2008, 9:22 AM
Being slightly familiar with BSD, I'm trying to get my
feet wet with
Linux, and was wondering if anyone can
I don't know if those are new kernels in
- http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/updates/i386/RPMS/?C=M;O=D
but as yum cannot see them is it because the headers are not updated?
- http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/updates/i386/headers/?C=M;O=D
Spike
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Because that page is served with UTF-8 by Apache. What you
want to do is
comment that line in the Apache config out. It's a
really stupid setting,
not really understandable why they put it in the default
config.
The apache docs state that it does no harm and there
Rob Townley wrote:
You may want to look at a third party samba packager for
better documentation such as: http://enterprisesamba.org/
My 3.0.32 is from the enterprise samba and coincidentally the
html charset problem (mentioned separately) is from viewing
the enterprise docs.
Someone
John wrote:
Check out the tcp nodelay samba option in smb.conf.
I have the following in my smb.conf
# Most people will find that this option gives better performance.
# See speed.txt and the manual pages for details
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
Actually it
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
More than the 25MB(!) of documentation which are in the
samba packages we release?
Yes the Enterprise Samba Docs are more than 28 Mb but are
raw in that they refer to Samba 3.2.x as well as having links
not working and charset specified in some files and unspecified
I've looked at the CentOS docs-list as well as the Wiki as I was interested
in Samba.
On one CentOS box I've got 3.0.32 (the latest bug-fixed version from Samba.org)
and on another I've got 3.0.28 (the latest from upstream). The docs look almost
the same and the docs refer to security = share.
Karanbir Singh wrote:
fwiw, a garnome build normally works fine anywhere.
I just got my head kicked in offlist by someone who tried
this so I
want to elaborate a bit : while garnome builds do work
fine, they work
fine only for the stuff that you build with it, pretty much
Matthew Kent wrote:
Any luck with this? :)
Not wanting to sound like a spoil sport but if its critical
to your server(s) can't you build your own kernel, pretty
sure I've seen this discussed on the docs list. I suppose
the CentOS plus one has to go through QA and regression
testing no?
The apache httpd.conf has AddDefaultCharset UTF-8 while
the page I'm viewing on my CentOS server is charset=ISO-8859-1
The page appears funny on the browser showing ��
Given that apache has the default charset shouldn't it honor it?
Why the �� characters?
Spike.
I've looked at the CentOS docs-list as well as the Wiki as I was interested
in Samba.
On one CentOS box I've got 3.0.32 (the latest bug-fixed version from Samba.org)
and on another I've got 3.0.28 (the latest from upstream). The docs look almost
the same and the docs refer to security = share.
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
There are multiple ways, many of them will make your system
unworkable.. all of them will break getting many updates
from CentOS.
Why not run another distro with the latest and greatest Gnome
or Kde if that is what you want? Trying to upgrade a CentOS
box will
44 matches
Mail list logo
