On 31/08/2011, at 11:07 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 08/31/2011 10:56 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote:
Just released:
https://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.2.html
thanks. I guess we should wait on a fix from upstream, make sure its
tested etc. If there is interest in doing a local
On 17/01/2009, at 9:46 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
Giuseppe Fuggiano wrote:
What should I use to configure a failover cluster under CentOS? Is
there Red Hat Cluster Suite or something like that?
Thank you in advance.
in general, 'heartbeat'. RHCS (Red Hat Cluster Service) is some
On 27/08/2008, at 6:57 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 8-26-2008 2:08 PM Karanbir Singh spake the following:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Florin Andrei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If your Perl
to be isolated to yum, as downloading the RPM directly via
FTP with wget or lftpget provides an RPM that *does* pass the GPG check.
I have upgraded key packages to the latest version (eg. yum upgrade
'yum*') and tried again to no avail.
Anyone seen this before?
Thanks,
Tom
--
Tom Lanyon
On 25/08/2008, at 11:37 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
How are you sync'ing the RPM's on your internal mirror? Do you run
createrepo locally to generate the metadata yourself or just rely on
the mirror's information?
We just sync 1:1 and rely on the mirror's metadata. As far as I know,
there
On 25/08/2008, at 10:54 AM, Tom Lanyon wrote:
Hi list,
Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed
from a 5.0 DVD I think).
The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --
checksig' test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a large portion of
them
On 25/08/2008, at 12:17 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
What's the exact error you get from yum? One thing you can do is to
check the output of sha1sum against the RPM in the Yum cache on the
client machine and compare that against the checksum value stored in
the primary.xml.gz file for one of the
On 01/07/2008, at 5:23 PM, Amos Shapira wrote:
Blahh 9, 10, whatever - it's not free.
I'd sort of expect it to work with PostgresQL/MySQL.
Weird choice, as the guy who works for me put it.
Thanks for the clarification.
--Amos
It has (only just) spawned from a non-open, non-free system
On 01/07/2008, at 2:19 PM, Amos Shapira wrote:
2008/6/30 Bazy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
Is anyone using Spacewalk (http://www.redhat.com/spacewalk/) on
CentOS 5 or 4? What kind of hardware are you useing it on?
Do I read it right that it requires Oracle 9??
(http://tinyurl.com/6rff8l) or
On 26/06/2008, at 3:57 AM, Finnur Örn Guðmundsson wrote:
Hi,
I'm running ~45 machines that boot from SAN/or are connected to our
SAN
fabrics on CentOS 4.x/5.x (And about 20 more running RHEL5) without
problems at all. The storage is IBM SVC (2145).
Just make sure multipathd is running on
On 24/06/2008, at 3:28 PM, fabian dacunha wrote:
Dear All
i have a centos 5 server running as a backup PC server and is working
perfect for abt 3 months
jus a couple of days back when i tried to telnet to the server it
gave me
connection refused
What on earth are you using telnet for?
On 23/06/2008, at 7:56 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Anyway, it's working now. I had to change the Xen config in /boot/
grub/menu and tell Xen not to use ttyS0 as a serial console for
itself.
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/InstallationNotes#head-b915c65538e3d0cb29da04e05cb278e44624a522
Good to
On 18/06/2008, at 11:00 PM, Ruslan Sivak wrote:
From what I understand, they limit you to 4GB for DomU, you still
have another 4GB available for Dom0, that you can use to run other
apps, including possibly QEMU, or some other virtualization products.
Russ
I haven't been following the
On 24/06/2008, at 9:08 AM, Luke S Crawford wrote:
We were discussing memory limits of the free (as in beer) closed
source
citrix xensource product- limits are added to the free product in
order
to encourage people to upgrade to the more expensive products.
These limits don't exist in the
On 29/04/2008, at 6:27 AM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
But when I try to install CentOS 5.1 via kickstart, anaconda
complains that You have not defined a root partition (/), which is
required for installation of CentOS to continue. Has anyone
successfully installed CentOS 5.X via kickstart
Hi all,
We're looking at deploying a small Xen cluster to run some of our
smaller applications. I'm curious to get the lists opinions and advice
on what's needed.
The plan at the moment is to have two or three servers running as the
Xen dom0 hosts and two servers running as storage
On 03/01/2008, at 9:55 AM, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Take a look at iSCSI for the storage servers. iSCSI Enterprise
Target is what I use here and it works well for us.
You don't really need shared filesystems if you are doing direct
block io to LVs or raw partitions as the Xen migration
Greetings,
My chosen CentOS mirror has a limit of 5 max FTP connections per IP. A
simple 'yum update' is hitting this limit and causing the whole update
procedure to fail.
Are there any settings to limit yum's FTP concurrency?
Regards,
Tom
___
On 06/12/2007, at 8:20 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
Tom Lanyon wrote:
Hi all,
Trying to install 5.0 or 5.1 (i386 or x86_64) on a new system from
an install DVD. As soon as the installer launches anaconda, the
screen shuts off and from this point I'm unable to switch to any
other tty
could it be bad media?
just a thought
I don't believe so -- I've tried booting from 5.0 CD1, 5.1-netinstall,
5.0 custom boot iso, 5.0 DVD and 5.0 PXE boot and using DVD, FTP and
HTTP as installation source with no luck.
I left my serial cable at work (doh) so I can't try that until
20 matches
Mail list logo
