Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:30:15PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> Jonathan Billings wrote: >> >> >> > Maybe you're not >> >> > aware of it, but there are a LOT of things that systemd fixes that >> >> > people are happy about. >> >> >> Like what ? I don't remember there

[CentOS] Was, Re: Just need to vent, is pmount

Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:11:56AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Well, that's interesting, about making sure it's stopped. I've asked >> here a month or two ago, and got no responses: my manager has me using >> pmount/pumount to mount the hard drives I'm putting in

Re: [CentOS] Alternative HTML Editor

Tim Evans wrote: > I've been using the SeaMonkey built-in HTML editor from the epel repo > for CentOS 6.7: > This is now dumping core. The latest release, directly from Mozilla > (2.9b4), fails with: > > /usr/local/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin: error while loading shared > libraries:

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> I don't take a position in the systemd argument, >> but you said that systemd fixes lots of problems. >> It is perfectly reasonable to ask you to name one of these problems, >> perhaps the one you think is most important. > > Compare any average sysv init script with a

[CentOS] CentOS 7, man

This is... odd. >From my workstation, where I'm directly logged in, if I ssh to any CentOS 7 box, as myself, and try to run man, it fails. Example 1: man dd man: cannot write to /var/cache/man/cat1/dd.1.gz in catman mode dd. Example 2: man dd man: can't chmod (null): Bad address man: can't

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

Sylvain CANOINE wrote: >> De: "Jonathan Billings" >> Maybe you're not aware of it, but there are a LOT of things that >> systemd fixes that people are happy about. > Like what ? I don't remember there were as many errors to fix before > systemd appeared. > Agreed. The speed

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

Tom Bishop wrote: > Can this thread just end, it's been hashed and rehashed. If there is a > moderator out there can we just kill the topic? > > Lets move along. :) Other than the one I posted, about pmount, sure, I'm out of it now. mark ___

[CentOS] CentOS 7, 327 kernel still crashing

I've just added the following to the CentOS bugtracker for CentOS-7 0009860. I admit to not being sure if it's the same issue, or a separate one, but this and other Dell servers - I *think* they're all R420's, but I could be wrong, just all do the same thing on boot. * I've just

Re: [CentOS] Monitor Dummy Device

Joey wrote: > > Am 20.01.2016 um 15:07 schrieb Jonathan Billings: >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:49:31PM +0100, Joey wrote: >>> i try xephyr/xnest, but i dont recognize how i can use a nested display >>> like >>> a second screen. >> I guess I still don't understand why you need a second, virtual >>

Re: [CentOS] HDD badblocks

Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016, 4:39 AM Alessandro Baggi > > wrote: >> Il 18/01/2016 12:09, Chris Murphy ha scritto: >> > What is the result for each drive? >> > >> > smartctl -l scterc >> > >> SCT Error Recovery Control command not supported >> > The

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: Heads up: OpenSSH users

Alice Wonder wrote: > On 01/15/2016 06:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 01/14/2016 10:20 AM, Michael H wrote: >>> Probably worth a read... >>> >>> http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-7.1p2 >>> Important SSH patch coming soon. For now, everyone on all operating systems, please do the

[CentOS] CentOS 7, missing tools

I'm trying to resolve an issue where a back is taking a *long* time. The data's being pulled from a CentOS 6 box by a CentOS 7 box. I went to use netstat, and iostat and sar... and they're not there. Should I install sysstat, or are there replacement tools I'm expected to use? mark

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: Heads up: OpenSSH users

Timo Schöler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 01/14/2016 05:34 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Michael H wrote: >>> Probably worth a read... >>> >>> http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-7.1p2 >>> Important SSH patch coming soon. For now, everyone on all

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: Heads up: OpenSSH users

Michael H wrote: > Probably worth a read... > > http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-7.1p2 > >> Important SSH patch coming soon. For now, everyone on all operating >> systems, please do the following: >> >> Add undocumented "UseRoaming no" to ssh_config or use "-oUseRoaming=no" >> to prevent

[CentOS] CentOS 7, annoyances in the logs

Annoyances: 1. I'm seeing a lot of noise in the logfile for a workstation that I just built a couple months ago. One complaint is that Configuration file /usr/lib/systemd/system/ebtables.service is marked executable. Please remove executable permission bits. Proceeding anyway. *Should* anything

[CentOS] Centos 7, grub2-mkconfig, unsupported sector

Hi, folks, Well, I get back from vacation, and three CentOS 7 boxes didn't come up this morning (my manager and the other admin did the update & reboot). On these three - but *not* another one or two, and I don't think those others are Dells, they're supermicro's - the 327 kernel fell into the

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7, grub2-mkconfig, unsupported sector [followup]

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >Well, I get back from vacation, and three CentOS 7 boxes didn't come up > this morning (my manager and the other admin did the update & reboot). > On these three - but *not* another one or two, and I don't think those > others are Dells, they're supermicro's - the

Re: [CentOS] Network services start before network is up since migrating to 7.2

John R Pierce wrote: > On 12/22/2015 1:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> I beg your pardon. What*possible* reason is there for a server, >> hardwired, to "announce" itself to anything, other than DHCP? Everywhere >> I've worked, and what I know, is that servers are assigned IP addresses, >> they

Re: [CentOS] Network services start before network is up since migrating to 7.2

Yamaban wrote: > On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:29, James Hogarth wrote: >> On 22 December 2015 at 10:33, Sylvain CANOINE wrote >>> - Mail original - De: "Marcelo Ricardo Leitner" À: "centos" Envoyé: Lundi 21 Décembre 2015 21:46:10 Objet: Re: [CentOS] Network services start

Re: [CentOS] Network services start before network is up since migrating to 7.2

James Hogarth wrote: > On 22 December 2015 at 10:33, Sylvain CANOINE > wrote: >> > De: "Marcelo Ricardo Leitner" >> In short, "you don't need it, so don't use it". >> They said NM is more a desktop-oriented tool, already had privilege >>

Re: [CentOS] Centos DVD -

Bob Goodwin wrote: > I have been trying to run Centos 6 and 7 > in virtualbox on this Fedora23 computer. > Actually I also tried Scientific Linux > and a DVD copy of Fedora 21 XFCE Live > that I had on hand. The Fedora21 works > as expected but I seem to be missing > something in Centos and

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Fri, December 18, 2015 10:27 am, Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:55:39AM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> >>> I guess we all are divided into two categories >>> >>> 1. If google [something] doesn't work on the operating system of my >>> choice,

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

Alice Wonder wrote: > Oh and sorry for the top posting, is there a way in Thunderbird for > CentOS to change that default? That's odd, Alice - my t-bird at work, and at home, both set me for bottom posting. Even in the config editor, I don't seen anything that looks like that setting to top

[CentOS] CentOS 7 installer bug?

The other admin I work with seems to have found a bug in the installer. The setup is: two internal SSD drives. Once the GUI gets to "select drive to install on", he goes to , creates a RAID 1, and partitions it, regular MBR (they're small). 1G for /boot as the first partition, 2G for swap as the

[CentOS] CentOS 7, yum-cron

Hi, folks, Our bastion host decided to update itself in the middle of the night, which gave at least one user issues. So, the question is why? In both /etc/yum/yum-cron-hourly.conf and /etc/yum/yum-cron.conf, apply_updates = no. Has anyone else seen this? mark

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from CentOS6.6 to CentOS 7

Digimer wrote: > On 15/12/15 11:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Traiano Welcome wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Digimer wrote: On 15/12/15 10:17 AM, Traiano Welcome wrote: > > Is it possible to upgrade from CentOS 6.7 to CentOS 7? >> Oh, btw, the plan

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from CentOS6.6 to CentOS 7

Traiano Welcome wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Digimer wrote: >> On 15/12/15 10:17 AM, Traiano Welcome wrote: >>> >>> Is it possible to upgrade from CentOS 6.7 to CentOS 7? >> Given how radically the OS changed, I would strongly advice against it. >> The move from

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from CentOS6.6 to CentOS 7

Digimer wrote: > On 15/12/15 11:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Traiano Welcome wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Digimer wrote: On 15/12/15 10:17 AM, Traiano Welcome wrote: > > Is it possible to upgrade from CentOS 6.7 to CentOS 7? >> Given how

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from CentOS6.6 to CentOS 7

Digimer wrote: > On 15/12/15 11:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Traiano Welcome wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Digimer wrote: On 15/12/15 10:17 AM, Traiano Welcome wrote: > > Is it possible to upgrade from CentOS 6.7 to CentOS 7? >> Given how

[CentOS] Dumb CentOS 7 question

How do you restart Xorg? I can't find a target for it, and restarting graphical.target doesn't seem to do it. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Dumb CentOS 7 question

Richard wrote: >> From: m.r...@5-cent.us >> >> How do you restart Xorg? I can't find a target for it, and >> restarting graphical.target doesn't seem to do it. > > Are you looking for startx? Nope. I want runlevel 5. As I said, I tried starting the graphical.target, but I didn't see Xorg start.

Re: [CentOS] Dumb CentOS 7 question

Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 12/15/2015 10:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> How do you restart Xorg? I can't find a target for it, and restarting >> graphical.target doesn't seem to do it. > > Restart gdm. Really? There's no systemd target to restart it, and graphical.target doesn't do it? Um.

Re: [CentOS] Dumb CentOS 7 question

Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 12/15/2015 11:26 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Really? There's no systemd target to restart it, and graphical.target >> doesn't do it? Um. > > Why do you think that? Sorry, I would have thought that graphical.target would do it. And suppose I'm using kdm...?

Re: [CentOS] Dumb CentOS 7 question

Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 03:30:45PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >> Really? There's no systemd target to restart it, and graphical.target >> >> doesn't do it? Um. >> > Why do you think that? >> Sorry, I would have thought that graphical.target would do it. And >>

Re: [CentOS] File Share Problem Between SAMBA AND WINDOWS 7

Erkin Aka wrote: > > i have installded samba 4 oncentos 7 and started to use as part of active > directory. But i have a problemabout sharing files between samba and > windows 7. > > i can browse and edit sharedfiles and folders on windows 7. > > But when i create a new folder, the owner of the

[CentOS] CentOS 7, NetworkMangler

This is annoying. I yum removed NetworkManager-wifi... and I'm still getting this junk in the logs: MetworkManager[7723]: error requesting auth for org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.enable-disable-wifi: (0) Authorization check failed: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Message did not

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and typical usage

Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 04:39:05PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> Alice Wonder wrote: >> > Just that it is not >> > difficult to use, there are some advantages - >> >> Why don't you say what the advantages are, >> instead of launching into a philosophical discussion of

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, NetworkMangler, and ipv6

James Hogarth wrote: > On 10 December 2015 at 15:00, wrote: > >> We've started having a problem with a CentOS 7 server. It looses its >> IPv6 address, if I understand this issue correctly. We can get in, >> if we do ssh -4, though. >> >> In the logs, I'm seeing this about twice

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, NetworkMangler, and ipv6

Yamaban wrote: > On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:00, m.roth@... wrote: > >> We've started having a problem with a CentOS 7 server. It looses its >> IPv6 address, if I understand this issue correctly. We can get in, >> if we do ssh -4, though. >> >> In the logs, I'm seeing this about twice an hour: >>

Re: [CentOS] wifi on servers and fedora [was Re: 7.2 kernel panic on boot]

Warren Young wrote: > On Dec 9, 2015, at 11:55 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Matthew Miller wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> So, you're saying that end users need to go poke their noses into the development process >>> >>> If you want

[CentOS] CentOS 7, NetworkMangler, and ipv6

We've started having a problem with a CentOS 7 server. It looses its IPv6 address, if I understand this issue correctly. We can get in, if we do ssh -4, though. In the logs, I'm seeing this about twice an hour: (pid 98466) unhandled DHCP event for interface ens3f0 Now, in googling, I get very

[CentOS] CentOS 6, bareos, kerberos?

After upgradeding to bareos 15.2, which also has a web ui, thereby making it usable (since the command line tool, bconsole, does not have a paging mechanism, and its sytax for choosing files to restore is, let us say, arcane), I've got another question: is *anyone* using bareos with kerberos? I

Re: [CentOS] wifi on servers and fedora [was Re: 7.2 kernel panic on boot]

Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one >> of >> > Because of the context of this conversation. We can't have user >> > feedback and involvement without user feedback and

Re: [CentOS] wifi on servers and fedora [was Re: 7.2 kernel panic on boot]

Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:54:57AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Matthew Miller wrote: >> > Working with your employer to fix the "will not allow Fedora into the >> > premises" part seems like a good start. >> >> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, bareos, kerberos?

Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:22:29AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> After upgradeding to bareos 15.2, which also has a web ui, thereby >> making it usable (since the command line tool, bconsole, does not >> have a paging mechanism, and its sytax for choosing files to >>

Re: [CentOS] wifi on servers and fedora [was Re: 7.2 kernel panic on boot]

Lamar Owen wrote: > On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is >> that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora >> developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or >> hundreds of

Re: [CentOS] wifi on servers and fedora [was Re: 7.2 kernel panic on boot]

Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 08:54:56AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: > Working with your employer to fix the "will not allow Fedora into the > premises" part seems like a good start. Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one of my users yesterday

Re: [CentOS] openvpn + routing

Helmut Drodofsky wrote: > Hello, > > there is one route missing: > > 128.0.0.0/1. > Did you mean 127.0.0.0? mark > config client: > route-nopull > redirect-gateway def1 bypass-dhcp > > best regards > Helmut > > Viele Grüße > Helmut Drodofsky > > Internet XS Service GmbH > Heßbrühlstraße 15

Re: [CentOS] Version numbering vis a vis CentOS and RHEL

1. Thank you, Matthew, for a new thread. This had nothing to do with the o/p of the old thread. 2. I'm not sure what more can possibly be said that hasn't already. Can we end this, unless the Board decides to solicit our opinion, and get back to solving issues? 3. Board of

Re: [CentOS] wifi on servers and fedora [was Re: 7.2 kernel panic on boot]

Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:03:50AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 02:50:38PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> > For laptops, great. For anything else, not so much. For example, >> > it's supposed to be an *ENTERPRISE* o/s... why does it >> >

Re: [CentOS] wifi on servers and fedora [was Re: 7.2 kernel panic on boot]

Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:03:50AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 02:50:38PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> > For laptops, great. For anything else, not so much. For example, >> > it's supposed to be an *ENTERPRISE* o/s... why does it >> >

[CentOS] A bareos question

I've upgraded to 15.2, which has a webui. However, I'd like to tell it to use kerboros, not a hard-coded password in a configuration file. Any clues? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 7.2 kernel panic on boot

Duncan Brown wrote: > On 03/12/2015 14:29, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 03.12.2015 um 15:06 schrieb Duncan Brown : >>> On 03/12/2015 13:54, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:44:47PM +, Duncan Brown wrote: > The last message before it is "switching

Re: [CentOS] 7.2 kernel panic on boot

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, December 3, 2015 4:28 am, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl : >>> I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent >>> version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure >>>

Re: [CentOS] 7.2 kernel panic on boot

Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 03.12.2015 um 15:06 schrieb Duncan Brown : >> On 03/12/2015 13:54, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:44:47PM +, Duncan Brown wrote: The last message before it is "switching to clocksource hpet" Then the panic

Re: [CentOS] 7.2 kernel panic on boot

Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 03.12.2015 um 15:40 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: >> Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, December 3, 2015 4:28 am, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl : CentOS 7.1511 (aka '7.2') not yet released ... >>> >>> aka

Re: [CentOS] diagnosing noise

Michael Hennebry wrote: > Though quiet at the moment, > my desktop sometimes sometimes makes a noise that I attribute > to either a disk or a fan on its last legs. > I'm looking for suggestions for distinguishing. > > For the disk, I expect I should use either hdparm of fsck. > Even after reading

Re: [CentOS] 7.2 kernel panic on boot

Duncan Brown wrote: > On 03/12/2015 17:00, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Duncan Brown wrote: >>> On 03/12/2015 14:29, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 03.12.2015 um 15:06 schrieb Duncan Brown : > On 03/12/2015 13:54, Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at

Re: [CentOS] 7.2 kernel panic on boot

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Thu, December 3, 2015 11:19 am, Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:46:10PM +, Duncan Brown wrote: >>> Here is a couple of pictures, >>> >>> http://i.imgur.com/Vqvqn1H.jpg >>> http://i.imgur.com/WQaz1j9.png >>> >>> Any use? > That is my main

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and bacula

Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Hi Fabio, > thanks for your reply. (I'm new with bacula). > To make things more clear: > 1) Reinstall CentOS and software; Why? This isn't Windows, so why reinstall CentOS, or are you building a new system, or migrating one from 6 to 7? mark

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and bacula

Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Il 02/12/2015 16:31, m.r...@5-cent.us ha scritto: >> Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>> Hi Fabio, >>> thanks for your reply. (I'm new with bacula). >>> To make things more clear: >>> 1) Reinstall CentOS and software; >> >> Why? This isn't Windows, so why reinstall CentOS, or are

Re: [CentOS] New monitor weirdnesses (CentOS 5.11)

Robert Heller wrote: > I just got a new monitor for my desktop system (the old one died after > *many* years of service). The new monitor is a high res 16:9 monitor, > but the VESA video driver insists on using 1024x768 (which was the > resolution of the *old* monitor). It does seem to detect

Re: [CentOS] IP table Restore

Jim Perrin wrote: > Sorry to step in here folks, but I have moderated this user for now for > their own good. Posting credentials to a public mailing list is not > going to end well for anyone. Thanks, Jim. If I knew who to email, I'd email his manager, and have this unqualified incompetent

Re: [CentOS] SOLVED: Help with Intel 6235 Wireless on CentOS 7 (pointer to good reading?)

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > My original problem is solved: it turns out that I just needed to install > > NetworkManager-wifi > > rpm (which adds WiFi plugin to network manager). Now I'm back in happy GUI > world in which everything "just works". Like on Macintosh... only better > ;-) > > PS beats me

Re: [CentOS] C7: How to configure raid at install time

Fred Smith wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:49:43PM -0700, Devin Reade wrote: >> --On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 11:07:12 PM -0500 Fred Smith >> wrote: > I've been building C7 VMs with RAID-1 in Virtualbox these last couple > of days, to pin down exactly how

Re: [CentOS] OT: bareos, Windoze, beating head on wall

Ireneusz Piasecki wrote: > W dniu 24.11.2015 o 19:38, m.r...@5-cent.us pisze: >> Again, I'm posting here because when I tried their mailing list, I >> didn't get much response. > > It's normal for bareos mailing list and bugtrac system. Bareos is paid > support oriented (even opesourced), so don't

Re: [CentOS] Google Ads in rsyslog documentation files

Peter Eckel wrote: > Hi Mark, > > I'm not sure whether upstream is the right place to address this, but I'll > try. I just downloaded all versions of the rsyslog sources from > rsyslog.com, and found 'googlesyndication' links in the following > versions: > Which means it's gone in 8.x.x and in

Re: [CentOS] OT: bareos, Windoze, beating head on wall

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Tue, November 24, 2015 12:38 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> I'm trying to do a restore, from my CentOS 6 box, to a WinDoze box. The >> restore command is *not* user-friendly if you just want to restore a few >> files. And it gets weird First, I have to mark my

Re: [CentOS] Google Ads in rsyslog documentation files

Peter Eckel wrote: > Hi all, > > I know this comes from upstream (and most likely from the rsyslog project itself), but what's your opinion about Google Ads in system documentation files? > >> [peckel@mucnvjmppmtr01 ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release >> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.7

[CentOS] OT: bareos, Windoze, beating head on wall

Again, I'm posting here because when I tried their mailing list, I didn't get much response. I'm trying to do a restore, from my CentOS 6 box, to a WinDoze box. The restore command is *not* user-friendly if you just want to restore a few files. And it gets weird First, I have to mark my path

Re: [CentOS] OT: bareos

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, November 19, 2015 12:13 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Hi, folks, >> >> I've got it set up, and it alleges that it's backing up Windows. >> However, when I try to run a restore for a Windows box, in bconsole, I >> say restore, then from most recent, then the

[CentOS] OT: bareos

Hi, folks, I've got it set up, and it alleges that it's backing up Windows. However, when I try to run a restore for a Windows box, in bconsole, I say restore, then from most recent, then the client, and I want to select files. It builds its directory tree (it says), then tells me it's at c:/

Re: [CentOS] C7: How to configure raid at install time

Fred Smith wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:49:43PM -0700, Devin Reade wrote: >> --On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 11:07:12 PM -0500 Fred Smith >> wrote: >> >> >But it isn't at all obvious how one would do a new RAID1 setup in >> >Anaconda >> >> Don't feel bad.

Re: [CentOS] C7: How to configure raid at install time

Fred Smith wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:49:43PM -0700, Devin Reade wrote: >> --On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 11:07:12 PM -0500 Fred Smith >> wrote: >> >> >But it isn't at all obvious how one would do a new RAID1 setup in >> >Anaconda >> >> Don't feel bad.

Re: [CentOS] OT: Replacing Venerable NAS

Tim Evans wrote: > I have an original-label Infrant (now NetGear) ReadyNAS storage > appliance that's been running for 8+ years. Except for replacing its > power supply, it has not skipped a beat in all this time. > > I use it primarily as a backup device (via NFS) for a couple of Linux >

Re: [CentOS] OT: Replacing Venerable NAS

Tim Evans wrote: > On 11/18/2015 11:50 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> What size storage are you looking at, and what's your budget? Are we >> talking a 4TB drive, or 33TB, or...? > > Sorry, should've mentioned this is for home/home office. The ReadyNAS is > a four-bay unit, with 500GB disks.

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Birta Levente wrote: > >> I have a supermicro server, motherboard is with C612 chipset and beside that with LSI3108 raid controller integrated.Two Intel SSD DC S3710 200GB. OS: Centos 7.1 up to date. >> >> My problem is that the Intel SSD Data Center

Re: [CentOS] Linux ate my RAM...

Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 18, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote: >> >> Because of caching, from VMWare's perspective, all Linux memory is >> being "used”. > > Nope. VMware’s memory ballooning feature purposely keeps some of the > guest’s RAM locked away from the kernel.

Re: [CentOS] OT: Replacing Venerable NAS

Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 18, 2015, at 1:01 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> >> On 11/18/2015 11:55 AM, Warren Young wrote: >>> It’s rather annoying to buy a NAS, then later realize you need to >>> buy*another* NAS as a mirror in case the first one roaches itself. >>> Isn’t

Re: [CentOS] firewalld being stupid

Nick Bright wrote: > On 11/17/2015 8:18 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> This behaviour is congruent with SELinux. One utility adjusts the >> permanent configuration, the one that will be applied at startup. >> Another changes the current running environment without altering the >> startup config.

Re: [CentOS] firewalld being stupid

J Martin Rushton wrote: > On 17/11/15 17:29, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >> On 17.11.2015 17:51, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> Nick Bright wrote: On 11/17/2015 8:18 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > This behaviour is congruent with SELinux. One utility adjusts > the permanent configuration,

Re: [CentOS] OT: bacula question

Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >> Question, for those that use/have used bacula: I've been setting up >> backups for one team, the server on CentOS 6, but they're on >> Windows. If we install the director on Windows, is it possible for >> the users to restore

Re: [CentOS] OT: bacula question

Correction: this is actually about bareos, not bacula. mark "it's been a long day" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] OT: bacula question

Devin Reade wrote: > --On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 02:14:56 PM -0500 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> 'Friad not. My users are saying they'd like the ability, from their >> Windows machines, to restore, without having to ask me to do something >> from the server. And they want to be able to chose

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 11/09/2015 09:59 AM, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 11/9/2015 9:50 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>> I don't see the distinction you're making. >> >> a incremental backup copies everything since the last incremental >> a differential copies everything since the last full. > > I

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Mon, November 9, 2015 12:42 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Gordon Messmer wrote: >>> On 11/09/2015 09:59 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 11/9/2015 9:50 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > I don't see the distinction you're making. a incremental backup copies

[CentOS] OT: bacula question

Hi, folks, Question, for those that use/have used bacula: I've been setting up backups for one team, the server on CentOS 6, but they're on Windows. If we install the director on Windows, is it possible for the users to restore files from the server to their own machine? mark

Re: [CentOS] c++ Development question

Leandro wrote: > Hello Centos user. > Im learning about c/c++ , so far every thing works great. > The problem begins when I try to install a new library or a third party > api. > For example now I need to install the jsoncpp implementation in my > centos box but I have no idea how to do it. > I

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7, ATI card, 30" monitor

Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: m.r...@5-cent.us [mailto:m.r...@5-cent.us] >> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 10:23 AM >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 7, ATI card, 30" monitor > >> That's why I said that at

[CentOS] CentOS 7, new video card in server

Hi, folks, I've got a new Dell R730 server. My users have two Tesla K-80's in it. Then, they wanted to add video, for complicated reasons. Anyway, there's the onboard VGA; I just put in a Quadro K600 (they require DP, and this card offers that). Plug in a VGA monirot (the card even comes

[CentOS] On a totally different note: calibre for CentOS 6?

Anyone got a link to an older version of calibre, that I can install on CentOS 6? I see it wants python >= 2.7.6; we have a package we built at work, but that's 2.7.3 mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, new video card in server [SOLVED]

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Thu, November 5, 2015 12:07 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >> I've got a new Dell R730 server. My users have two Tesla K-80's in >> it.Then, they wanted to add video, for complicated reasons. >> >>Anyway, there's the onboard VGA; I just put in a Quadro K600 (they >>

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7, ATI card, 30" monitor

Lamar Owen wrote: > On 11/04/2015 04:48 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Yep. They got nothing for CentOS 7. Btw, we got him the full width by >> changing the cable, from DVI-I to DVI-D (dual link). Then he had to >> change it back to not recognizing the full width of the screen via the >> control

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7, ATI card, 30" monitor

Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote: >> From: m.r...@5-cent.us [mailto:m.r...@5-cent.us] >> >> John R Pierce wrote: >> > On 11/3/2015 8:11 AM, John R Pierce wrote: >> >> On 11/3/2015 7:33 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >>> Well, I got my user back to being able to use his system,

Re: [CentOS] stale file handle issue [SOLVED]

Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 12:59:14PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> The answer is that the large exported filesystem is a very large XFS... >> and at least through CentOS 6, upstream has *never* fixed an NFS bug >> that I find, googling, being complained about in '09:

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

Boris Epstein wrote: >> >> My turn for a dumb question: from not paying a lot of attention to this >> thread, the answer isn't clear to me: has the *host* recognized the >> disk? If not, the guest's not going to see it. > > IMO your question is not dumb at all. Unfortunately, I don't have an >

Re: [CentOS] stale file handle issue [SOLVED]

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Wed, November 4, 2015 11:59 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >> The answer is that the large exported filesystem is a very large XFS... >> and at least through CentOS 6, upstream has *never* fixed an NFS bug >> that I find, googling, being complained about in '09: it gags

[CentOS] stale file handle issue [SOLVED]

*sigh* The answer is that the large exported filesystem is a very large XFS... and at least through CentOS 6, upstream has *never* fixed an NFS bug that I find, googling, being complained about in '09: it gags on inodes > 32bit (not sure if that's signed, or unsigned, but). The answer was to

Re: [CentOS] getting a CentOS6 VM on VMware ESXi platform to recognize a new disk device

Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello Julius, > > Thanks - but it doesn't seem to work. > > I installed sg3_utils and ran > #scsi-rescan > > but that seemed to have done nothing for some reason. > My turn for a dumb question: from not paying a lot of attention to this thread, the answer isn't clear to me:

[CentOS] Centos 7, ATI card, 30" monitor

Well, I got my user back to being able to use his system, but I've still got one issue: it's running on the VESA driver - there is *no* Catalyst build for this monitor, for CentOS 7. From a lot of googling, nothing's been done since the summer of '14 (lspci reports it as a FirePro V3900). Any

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >