On Wed, February 23, 2011 13:07, Markus Falb wrote:
On 23.2.2011 18:27, Larry Vaden wrote:
US-CERT encourages users and administrators using the affected
versions of BIND to upgrade to BIND 9.7.3.
Optionally, one can wait on a backport.
Ahhh!
Have a look at the relevant bugzilla ticket
US-CERT encourages users and administrators using the affected
versions of BIND to upgrade to BIND 9.7.3.
Optionally, one can wait on a backport.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Larry Vaden
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 12:27 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject:
[CentOS]http://www.securityweek.com/high-severity-bind-vulnera
bility-advisory-issued
Larry Vaden wrote:
US-CERT encourages users and administrators using the affected
versions of BIND to upgrade to BIND 9.7.3.
Optionally, one can wait on a backport.
Larry, go away. You don't seem to contribute anything at all to the list,
other than your obnoxiousness, and your desire to
On 23.2.2011 18:27, Larry Vaden wrote:
US-CERT encourages users and administrators using the affected
versions of BIND to upgrade to BIND 9.7.3.
Optionally, one can wait on a backport.
Ahhh!
Have a look at the relevant bugzilla ticket at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679496
On 02/23/2011 12:55 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Larry Vaden wrote:
US-CERT encourages users and administrators using the affected
versions of BIND to upgrade to BIND 9.7.3.
Optionally, one can wait on a backport.
Larry, go away. You don't seem to contribute anything at all to the list,
I don't want to raise the drama, so please don't take this wrong. In
this case though, I do think that a warning on the ML about a security
issue is justified. You can't be too careful.
Except that this issue does not affect BIND in rhel and thus CentOS
therefore making it yet more pointless
Many thanks to Markus Falb for publishing his excellent research - the
same research that Larry could also have done.
This issue did not affect the versions of bind as shipped with
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4, 5, or 6.
James Hogarth wrote:
He obviously has a fascination with
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:03 PM, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com wrote:
Except that this issue does not affect BIND in rhel and thus CentOS
therefore making it yet more pointless drivel from the OP.
Please take off the blinders and realize there are lots of folks (some
x% of a million or
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
Many thanks to Markus Falb for publishing his excellent research - the
same research that Larry could also have done.
This issue did not affect the versions of bind as shipped with
Red Hat Enterprise
2011/2/23 Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:03 PM, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com
wrote:
Except that this issue does not affect BIND in rhel and thus CentOS
therefore making it yet more pointless drivel from the OP.
Please take off the blinders and realize
Please take off the blinders and realize there are lots of folks (some x% of a
million or more) on this list who compile from current source in order to
minimize their risks and are therefore the subject audience.
On the one hand, you have Paul Vixie and crew (authors of BIND) and
US_CERT
On 2/23/2011 1:21 PM, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:03 PM, James Hogarthjames.hoga...@gmail.com
wrote:
Except that this issue does not affect BIND in rhel and thus CentOS
therefore making it yet more pointless drivel from the OP.
Please take off the blinders and realize
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
It is not wise to install packages from sources because it messes the package
management.
Agreed; that is why folks like Jeff Johnson and John Stanley share
their knowledge about how to do it such that your outcome
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 13:23 -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
Many thanks to Markus Falb for publishing his excellent research - the
same research that Larry could also have done.
This issue did not affect the
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 07:28:15PM +, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
[ Larry Vaden wrote: (please don't snip attributions)]
Please take off the blinders and realize there are lots of folks (some x%
of a
million or more) on this list who compile from current source in order to
minimize
On 2/23/2011 2:23 PM, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Always Learningcen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
Many thanks to Markus Falb for publishing his excellent research - the
same research that Larry could also have done.
This issue did not affect the versions of bind as
Larry Vaden wrote on Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:21:23 -0600:
Please take off the blinders and realize there are lots of folks (some
x% of a million or more) on this list who compile from current source
in order to minimize their risks and are therefore the subject
audience.
Nonsense, there is no
18 matches
Mail list logo
