Re: [CentOS] ?barracuda? listing in logwatch session 123 of user root.

2016-07-22 Thread m . roth
Mark Milhollan wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Jon LaBadie wrote: > >>My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen >>section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". >> >>I have not problem with the emails it noted as >>being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" >>as a commercial

Re: [CentOS] ?barracuda? listing in logwatch session 123 of user root.

2016-07-22 Thread Mark Milhollan
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Jon LaBadie wrote: >My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen >section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". > >I have not problem with the emails it noted as >being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" >as a commercial product. > >I have neither

Re: [CentOS] ?barracuda? listing in logwatch session 123 of user root.

2016-07-21 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:24:19AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Tue, July 19, 2016 10:06 pm, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen > > section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". > > > > I have not problem with the emails it noted as > > being

Re: [CentOS] ?barracuda? listing in logwatch session 123 of user root.

2016-07-21 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:22:59AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/19/2016 10:06 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen > > section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". > > > > I have not problem with the emails it noted as > > being rejected. But

Re: [CentOS] ?barracuda? listing in logwatch session 123 of user root.

2016-07-20 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 04:14:36PM +0100, Always Learning wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 23:06 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > > My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen > > section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". > > Is this a C7 issue, as opposed to C5 or C6 matter ? > C7.2,

Re: [CentOS] ?barracuda? listing in logwatch session 123 of user root.

2016-07-20 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Tue, July 19, 2016 10:06 pm, Jon LaBadie wrote: > My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen > section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". > > I have not problem with the emails it noted as > being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" > as a commercial product. Maybe

Re: [CentOS] ?barracuda? listing in logwatch session 123 of user root.

2016-07-20 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 07/19/2016 10:06 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote: > My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen > section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". > > I have not problem with the emails it noted as > being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" > as a commercial product. > > I have

Re: [CentOS] ?barracuda? listing in logwatch session 123 of user root.

2016-07-20 Thread Always Learning
On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 23:06 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen > section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". Is this a C7 issue, as opposed to C5 or C6 matter ? Was the section empty or populated with entries ? -- Regards, Paul. England, EU.

[CentOS] ?barracuda? listing in logwatch session 123 of user root.

2016-07-19 Thread Jon LaBadie
My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". I have not problem with the emails it noted as being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" as a commercial product. I have neither configured nor enabled any barracuda software and "yum