Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Monday 12 January 2009 09:01, Sorin Srbu wrote:
ssh -L 3390:private-ip-of-remote-XP-machine:3389
usern...@ip-or-hostname-of-remote-nat-server
>>> Well, first, private-ip-of-remote-XP-machine is dynamic, given by my ISP's
>>> dhcp server, so I cannot have 10
On Monday 12 January 2009 04:13, Christopher Chan wrote:
> > the connection must be initiated from C's side to A. This simply cannot
> > work simultaneously, so I tried to make use of my public server B which
> > can be used as a "bridge" between A and C. So, A connects to B, C
> > connects to B, a
On Monday 12 January 2009 03:36, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 1-9-2009 12:41 PM Marko Vojinovic spake the following:
> > I have a WinXP machine that is to be unattended for a period of 3 years
> > (yes, I know, it sounds ridiculous, but still...). What I need is remote
> > access to it to perform regula
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
>Marko Vojinovic
>Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 1:36 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Remote control of a WinXP machine from a Linux
host
>
> the connection must be initiated from C's side to A. This simply cannot work
> simultaneously, so I tried to make use of my public server B which can be
> used as a "bridge" between A and C. So, A connects to B, C connects to B, and
> then A and C communicate. Roughly speaking...
>
> That wa
on 1-9-2009 12:41 PM Marko Vojinovic spake the following:
> Sorry for an off topic post, but a lot of you folks are sysadmins here or
> there, and just might have a suggestion... ;-)
>
> I have a WinXP machine that is to be unattended for a period of 3 years (yes,
> I know, it sounds ridiculous,
> No, the main problem is that A is behind my ISP's NAT. I want to access it
> from C (yes, I'll be travelling a lot and C might be just about anywhere).
> But the problem is that since A is behind a NAT, the connection must be
> initiated from A's side to C. Also, since C might be behind some othe
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009, John R Pierce wrote:
>Bill Campbell wrote:
>> The real issue is how one would script this on the Windows side
>> as the OpenVPN client I've seen for Windows assumes GUI control.
>
>the Windows OpenVPN implementation supports pretty much the same command
>line interface as the
Bill Campbell wrote:
> The real issue is how one would script this on the Windows side
> as the OpenVPN client I've seen for Windows assumes GUI control.
>
the Windows OpenVPN implementation supports pretty much the same command
line interface as the Unix version... the OpenVPN GUI is just an
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>On Saturday 10 January 2009 23:03, John R Pierce wrote:
>> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> > I have a WinXP machine that is to be unattended for a period of 3 years
>> > (yes, I know, it sounds ridiculous, but still...). What I need is remote
>> > access to i
> That was my initial idea, but seems too complicated to work out, so I asked
> for a possible easier alternative. :-)
>
Might be to easy an alternative.
http://www.gotomypc.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mail
On Saturday 10 January 2009 22:48, you wrote:
> I am confused by your description. Do you mean you have Machine A and
> Machine B and you want to be able to access both of them at any time
> over the next three years from Machine C but you could be behind a
> firewall with machine C i.e. I assume y
On Saturday 10 January 2009 23:03, John R Pierce wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > I have a WinXP machine that is to be unattended for a period of 3 years
> > (yes, I know, it sounds ridiculous, but still...). What I need is remote
> > access to it to perform regular system maintenance, virus cle
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Sorry for an off topic post, but a lot of you folks are sysadmins here or
> there, and just might have a suggestion... ;-)
>
> I have a WinXP machine that is to be unattended for a period of 3 years (yes,
> I know, it sounds ridiculous, but still...). What I need is remot
On Friday 09 January 2009 21:41, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> I have a WinXP machine that is to be unattended for a period of 3 years
> (yes, I know, it sounds ridiculous, but still...). What I need is remote
> access to it to perform regular system maintenance, virus cleanups,
> occasional software in
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Sorry for an off topic post, but a lot of you folks are sysadmins here or
> there, and just might have a suggestion... ;-)
>
> I have a WinXP machine that is to be unattended for a period of 3 years (yes,
> I know, it sounds ridiculous, but still...). What I need is remot
Well use Radmin 2.2 for the server and
Wine and Radmin 3 for the Client
Works fine for me
--
Franklin S Werren ad...@chautauqualake.net
www.chautauqualake.net
Confidentiality Note: This email and any attachments are confidential and may
contain privileged information intended for the addr
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Sorry for an off topic post, but a lot of you folks are sysadmins here or
> there, and just might have a suggestion... ;-)
>
> I have a WinXP machine that is to be unattended for a period of 3 years (yes,
> I know, it sounds ridiculous, but still...). What I need is remo
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Sorry for an off topic post, but a lot of you folks are >sysadmins here or
> there, and just might have a suggestion... ;-)
> I have a WinXP machine that is to be unattended for a >period of 3 years (yes,
> I know, it sounds ridiculous, but
OpenVPN.
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
- "Marko Vojinovic" wrote:
> Sorry for an off topic post, but a lot of you folks are sysadmins here
> or
> there, and just might have a suggestion... ;-)
>
> I have a WinXP machine that is to be unattended for a
Sorry for an off topic post, but a lot of you folks are sysadmins here or
there, and just might have a suggestion... ;-)
I have a WinXP machine that is to be unattended for a period of 3 years (yes,
I know, it sounds ridiculous, but still...). What I need is remote access to
it to perform regu
21 matches
Mail list logo
