Great information to know. That sounds like a very nasty situation.
--
Thanks,
Gene Brandt SCSA
8625 Carriage Road
River Ridge, LA 70123
home 504-737-4295
cell 504-452-3250
Family Web Page | My Web Page | LinkedIn | Facebook | Resumebucket
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 12:40 -0800, John R Pie
> On 01/06/11 11:11 AM, Gene Brandt wrote:
>> Thanks for that bit of advice. I've never been able to recover from
>> hardware raid on any Intel system. The software raid is simple to
>> configure and it works!
>
> its not actually hardware raid.
>
> when you set the 'raid mode' in the BIOS, at powe
On 01/06/11 11:11 AM, Gene Brandt wrote:
> Thanks for that bit of advice. I've never been able to recover from
> hardware raid on any Intel system. The software raid is simple to
> configure and it works!
its not actually hardware raid.
when you set the 'raid mode' in the BIOS, at power up it s
Thanks for that bit of advice. I've never been able to recover from
hardware raid on any Intel system. The software raid is simple to
configure and it works!
--
Thanks,
Gene Brandt SCSA
8625 Carriage Road
River Ridge, LA 70123
home 504-737-4295
cell 504-452-3250
Family Web Page | My Web Pag
> You are much better off disabling the fake raid in bios and just using
> software raid:
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SoftwareRAIDonCentOS5
>
> http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/s1-raid-config.html
>
> Or Google: centos 5 software raid.
Thanks Matt.
I have done sw rai
> Hi all,
>
> Installing 5.5 on a fresh system having an Intel RAID.
>
> My 2 drives are configured as a mirror within the Intel BIOS.
>
> When starting my install, Anaconda throws an exception.
>
> After a brief goog, I see one possible fix is - at the install prompt,
> type;
>
> linux text nodmra
On Jan 6, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> aurfal...@gmail.com wrote on Wed, 5 Jan 2011 18:55:14 -0800:
>
>> linux text smenodmraid
>
> This a parameter unknown to Google. Did you make it up, or where did
> you
> get it from?
Well, I wished I would have made it up as we all ride on the
aurfal...@gmail.com wrote on Wed, 5 Jan 2011 18:55:14 -0800:
> linux text smenodmraid
This a parameter unknown to Google. Did you make it up, or where did you
get it from?
> Although I've a feeling that just installing in text mode rather than
> GUI would have been enough.
me, too ;-) At lea
On Jan 5, 2011, at 6:09 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:36 PM, wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Installing 5.5 on a fresh system having an Intel RAID.
>>
>> My 2 drives are configured as a mirror within the Intel BIOS.
>
> "Intel RAID" covers a lot of sins.
Yes, I like this, and
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:36 PM, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Installing 5.5 on a fresh system having an Intel RAID.
>
> My 2 drives are configured as a mirror within the Intel BIOS.
"Intel RAID" covers a lot of sins. Some RAID cards rely on OS software
to do much of the RAID: they're jokes, really. If i
Hi all,
Installing 5.5 on a fresh system having an Intel RAID.
My 2 drives are configured as a mirror within the Intel BIOS.
When starting my install, Anaconda throws an exception.
After a brief goog, I see one possible fix is - at the install prompt,
type;
linux text nodmraid
This is fine
On 10-05-19 10:33 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 5/19/2010 8:25 AM, tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote:
>
>>
>> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending
>> this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the internet and
>> this windoze box uses the Centos
On 10-05-19 07:10 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Digimer wrote:
>> On 10-05-18 08:51 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote:
>>> Just installed from scratch 5.5
>>>
>>> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending
>>> this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the inter
On 5/19/2010 8:25 AM, tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote:
>
> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending
> this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the internet and
> this windoze box uses the Centos box as a gateway.
I've had to swap out
Digimer wrote:
> On 10-05-19 07:10 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> > Digimer wrote:
> >> On 10-05-18 08:51 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote:
> >>> Just installed from scratch 5.5
> >>>
> >>> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending
> >>> this message as the the Cent
On 10-05-19 07:10 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Digimer wrote:
>> On 10-05-18 08:51 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote:
>>> Just installed from scratch 5.5
>>>
>>> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending
>>> this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the inter
Digimer wrote:
> On 10-05-18 08:51 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote:
>> Just installed from scratch 5.5
>>
>> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending
>> this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the internet and
>> this windoze box uses the Centos box as a gate
On 10-05-18 08:51 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote:
> Just installed from scratch 5.5
>
> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending
> this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the internet and
> this windoze box uses the Centos box as a gateway.
I've had to swap
Just installed from scratch 5.5
Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending
this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the internet and
this windoze box uses the Centos box as a gateway.
___
CentOS mailing list
19 matches
Mail list logo
