Re: [CentOS] ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo

2011-02-19 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/19/2011 01:13 AM, Larry Vaden wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: Just for the record ... we (the CentOS Project) do not recommend this site. They are using our name without permission. Attribution goes to EliteMoly: CentALT repository not

Re: [CentOS] ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo

2011-02-18 Thread Larry Vaden
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: Just for the record ... we (the CentOS Project) do not recommend this site.  They are using our name without permission. Attribution goes to EliteMoly: CentALT repository not ready for mirroring, rpms not signed. EPEL is

Re: [CentOS] ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo

2011-02-17 Thread Larry Vaden
Progress report on vetting CentALT repo: quote SRPMs now here http://centos.alt.ru/pub/repository/centos/5/SRPMS/ One of mirror CentALT here http://centos.tel.dn.ua/repository Denis Frolov 2011-02-17, 12:09 /quote ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo

2011-02-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/16/2011 05:03 PM, Larry Vaden wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote: N.B. pkgs.org is showing that CentALT is at current code and Fedora is using a release candidate! Per a discussion with an Internet2 professor this PM: ACHTUNG: Note the repo

[CentOS] ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo

2011-02-16 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote: N.B. pkgs.org is showing that CentALT is at current code and Fedora is using a release candidate! Per a discussion with an Internet2 professor this PM: ACHTUNG: Note the repo is apparently without SRPMs so it becomes

Re: [CentOS] ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo

2011-02-16 Thread John R. Dennison
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 05:03:33PM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote: ACHTUNG: Note the repo is apparently without SRPMs so it becomes difficult to vet. This is a show-stopper for many, including myself. Thanks for pointing it out. However... 77 lines of unnecessary

Re: [CentOS] ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo

2011-02-16 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:41 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:        However...        77 lines of unnecessary untrimmed text removed.  Is it too much        to ask you to be considerate to others and trim non-essential        text?  I direct you to the mailing list guidelines

Re: [CentOS] ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo

2011-02-16 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:41 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 05:03:33PM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote: ACHTUNG:  Note the repo is apparently without SRPMs so it becomes difficult to vet.        This is a show-stopper for many, including myself.  Thanks for