On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:47:24PM -0400, Alfred von Campe wrote:
Forget I ever said I wanted to replace glibc. Assume it’s a different
library or application.
Except libc is not just like any other library. Unless you're going
to recompile the software, the location of the ld loader is
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com wrote:
Tell your vendor you want a centos 6 version of the library, it's really
not a huge ask, esp if you are paying them. If they say no, do a new
install of centos 7 and run it on a different box. It's the only
On 03/31/2015 11:12 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com
wrote:
Tell your vendor you want a centos 6 version of the library, it's really
not a huge ask, esp if you are paying them. If they say no, do a new
install of centos 7 and
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:21 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Perhaps, but I’m running CentOS 6.6 i686 (i.e., 32-bit), and it appears
that Docker requires 64-bit. Oh well, I was getting my hopes up for a
while.
snip
I haven't really been following this thread closely, but would it be a
dumb
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com
wrote:
On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:21, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote:
Isn't this the problem that docker was invented to solve?
Yes, you could address this with docker quite easily, depending on the
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com wrote:
On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:21, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote:
Isn't this the problem that docker was invented to solve?
Yes, you could address this with docker quite easily, depending on the app.
Perhaps, but
On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:21, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote:
Isn't this the problem that docker was invented to solve?
Yes, you could address this with docker quite easily, depending on the app.
Perhaps, but I’m running CentOS 6.6 i686 (i.e., 32-bit), and it appears that
Docker requires
Alfred von Campe wrote:
We have a third party shared library from a vendor that requires glib 2.15 or
newer.
We are using CentOS 6.6 which comes with glibc 2.12, and I know it can’t be
replaced
as it’s an integral part of the OS.
However, is it possible to build a glib 2.15 RPM from
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com
wrote:
We have a third party shared library from a vendor that requires glib 2.15
or newer. We are using CentOS 6.6 which comes with glibc 2.12, and I know
it can't be replaced as it's an integral part of the OS.
On Mar 30, 2015, at 17:24, Patrick Flaherty pflahe...@wsi.com wrote:
Tell your vendor you want a centos 6 version of the library, it's really
not a huge ask, esp if you are paying them. If they say no, do a new
install of centos 7 and run it on a different box. It's the only reasonable
We have a third party shared library from a vendor that requires glib 2.15 or
newer. We are using CentOS 6.6 which comes with glibc 2.12, and I know it
can’t be replaced as it’s an integral part of the OS.
However, is it possible to build a glib 2.15 RPM from source to be installed in
11 matches
Mail list logo
