On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>I really recommend using the fewest partitions possible,
>replacing
>a disk will require you to handle each partition individually.
This is not a large burden, but I do agree to keep it simple.
>It's probably best to do a small /boot on RAID1 and
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:32:16PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 11/24/2015 07:35 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> >it seemed to max out at around 9900 MB. This for
> >sure won't do when I build it on real hardware, so I'm wondering if
> >anyone else here has a clue what's going on??
>
> IIRC,
Fred Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:49:43PM -0700, Devin Reade wrote:
>> --On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 11:07:12 PM -0500 Fred Smith
>> wrote:
> I've been building C7 VMs with RAID-1 in Virtualbox these last couple
> of days, to pin down exactly how
On 11/25/2015 09:09 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
should I put swap on both drives? should it be RAID1 also, or just
two swap partitions not in any RAID volume?
I really recommend using the fewest partitions possible, since md RAID
operates on partitions (Anaconda won't create full disk md RAID
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:49:43PM -0700, Devin Reade wrote:
> --On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 11:07:12 PM -0500 Fred Smith
> wrote:
>
> >But it isn't at all obvious how one would do a new RAID1 setup in
> >Anaconda
>
> Don't feel bad. The abortion that is the
On 11/24/2015 07:35 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
it seemed to max out at around 9900 MB. This for
sure won't do when I build it on real hardware, so I'm wondering if
anyone else here has a clue what's going on??
IIRC, Anaconda can't create "raid1" LVM volumes. That is, you can't
create LVs that are
On 11/18/2015 08:07 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
Can anyone provide (or give pointers to) a good recipe for doing this?
One of the things I'm working on right now is moving toward a single
standard partition layout for all systems, with RAID or without. The
reason I want to do that is that it'll
On 11/19/2015 06:56 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
My C7 boxes (workstations, no C7 servers, please) are all installed using
kickstart, and drives are partitioned exactly as I described in kickstart
file. There is still something we can happily use;-)
Perhaps by luck. Anaconda will definitely
On 11/18/2015 08:49 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
The abortion that is the RHEL/CentOS 7 graphical
install interface is far too dumbed-down to be easily usable by anyone
that understands what is going on under the covers.
I really don't think that's an appropriate or useful way to discuss
software.
On Fri, November 20, 2015 10:49 am, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 11/19/2015 06:56 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> My C7 boxes (workstations, no C7 servers, please) are all installed
>> using
>> kickstart, and drives are partitioned exactly as I described in
>> kickstart
>> file. There is still
On 11/20/2015 09:11 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
And indeed it did. Not to the extent of going ultimately against my
scheme. OK, CentOS (7) just fell yet one more notch down in my opinion.
Thanks for correcting me.
Have a look at the links I sent earlier and see if that approach might
work for
On Nov 19, 2015, at 11:54 AM, Warren Young wrote:
>
> Several OSes made /usr/{bin,lib} the same as /{bin,lib} way before Red Hat:
> Solaris, OS X, and Cygwin, at the least.
Small correction: OS X doesn’t symlink /{bin,lib} to /usr/{bin,lib} as Solaris,
EL7, and Cygwin do,
On Nov 18, 2015, at 9:49 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
>
> The one thing I would point out regarding the above link is that despite
> conventional UNIX wisdom, *don't* put /usr on a separate filesystem
> in CentOS 7. Thank you RedHat
>
> Flames to /dev/null.
Sorry, you don’t get to
--On Thursday, November 19, 2015 11:54:19 AM -0700 Warren Young
wrote:
?Twas *progress* that made it so, specifically the fact
that even a throwaway USB key has enough space to hold the complete OS on
it these days.
For the record, size of the disk was never the original
On Thu, November 19, 2015 4:49 pm, Devin Reade wrote:
> --On Thursday, November 19, 2015 11:54:19 AM -0700 Warren Young
> wrote:
>
>> ?Twas *progress* that made it so, specifically the fact
>> that even a throwaway USB key has enough space to hold the complete OS
>> on
>> it
On Nov 19, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>
> Prior to SysV…
Sorry, that should be “SVR4”.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Nov 19, 2015, at 3:49 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
>
> size of the disk was never the original motivation for
> keeping / separate, at least within my memory
Prior to SysV, the location of user home directories was not standardized, and
AT recommended that you put them in /usr.[1]
On Thu, November 19, 2015 8:15 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Fred Smith wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:49:43PM -0700, Devin Reade wrote:
>>> --On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 11:07:12 PM -0500 Fred Smith
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >But it isn't at all obvious how one
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:49:43PM -0700, Devin Reade wrote:
> --On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 11:07:12 PM -0500 Fred Smith
> wrote:
>
> >But it isn't at all obvious how one would do a new RAID1 setup in
> >Anaconda
>
> Don't feel bad. The abortion that is the
Fred Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:49:43PM -0700, Devin Reade wrote:
>> --On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 11:07:12 PM -0500 Fred Smith
>> wrote:
>>
>> >But it isn't at all obvious how one would do a new RAID1 setup in
>> >Anaconda
>>
>> Don't feel bad.
Fred Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:49:43PM -0700, Devin Reade wrote:
>> --On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 11:07:12 PM -0500 Fred Smith
>> wrote:
>>
>> >But it isn't at all obvious how one would do a new RAID1 setup in
>> >Anaconda
>>
>> Don't feel bad.
Hi all!
I'm still on C6. I'm using a RAID1 configuration (Linux software RAID)
and I'd like to either use the same one, or possibly configure it on
new drives (larger) when I upgrade to C7. (I'm really feeling the need
to move off C6.)
But it isn't at all obvious how one would do a new RAID1
--On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 11:07:12 PM -0500 Fred Smith
wrote:
But it isn't at all obvious how one would do a new RAID1 setup in
Anaconda
Don't feel bad. The abortion that is the RHEL/CentOS 7 graphical
install interface is far too dumbed-down to be
23 matches
Mail list logo