Does anyone know the time-frame when security updates might be published
for these applications in CentOS 5?
wireshark
postgresql
krb5
java-1.6.0-openjdk
java-1.6.0-sun
The following security updates have been published upstream (after
release of RHEL 5.6) to remedy the vulnerabilities described
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 14:02 -0500, Cal Webster wrote:
Does anyone know the time-frame when security updates might be published
for these applications in CentOS 5?
wireshark
postgresql
krb5
java-1.6.0-openjdk
java-1.6.0-sun
Don't use anyone of these privately (on desktop, laptop etc.)
Always Learning wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 14:02 -0500, Cal Webster wrote:
Does anyone know the time-frame when security updates might be published
for these applications in CentOS 5?
wireshark
postgresql
krb5
java-1.6.0-openjdk
java-1.6.0-sun
Don't use anyone of these privately (on
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 14:10 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Um, don't use kerberos? Or postgresql? Or Sun's, er, Oracle's java? I
can't see that going over well.
Sorry to let everyone down. I can't get too excited about these
outstanding security patches. After 5 hours of trying, I can still
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Cal Webster wrote:
java-1.6.0-sun
non FOSS, non-source provided, no? This is in an addon
channel in RHEL, and so far as I know we have never shipped
such
Of the others the wireshark update is a periodic update of
some edge case dissectors [these developers are quite
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com wrote:
I know the development team is furiously working to get 5.6 out the door
so I understand that there will be delays. However, it was my
understanding that Critical security updates and those that are
remotely exploitable
I know the development team is furiously working to get 5.6 out the door
so I understand that there will be delays. However, it was my
understanding that Critical security updates and those that are
remotely exploitable would be pushed out ahead of 5.6.
That is my
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 14:28 -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Cal Webster wrote:
java-1.6.0-sun
non FOSS, non-source provided, no? This is in an addon
channel in RHEL, and so far as I know we have never shipped
such
You're right - shouldn't have listed that one. I manage
In article 6182d300241c67c712c405d004e0b5ab.squir...@host290.hostmonster.com,
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 14:02 -0500, Cal Webster wrote:
Does anyone know the time-frame when security updates might be published
for these applications in CentOS 5?
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Ian Murray murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
However, it was my
understanding that Critical security updates and those that are
remotely exploitable would be pushed out ahead of 5.6.
That is my understanding, too. However, I see that the only Critical
one
On 02/24/2011 02:05 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
I know the development team is furiously working to get 5.6 out the door
so I understand that there will be delays. However, it was my
understanding that Critical security updates and those that are
remotely exploitable would be pushed out
I wish people would read the list archives instead of posting the same
kind of questione time and again.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 11:30 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com wrote:
I know the development team is furiously working to get 5.6 out the door
so I understand that there will be delays. However, it was my
understanding that Critical
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 22:00 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I wish people would read the list archives instead of posting the same
kind of questione time and again.
Kai
Thank you for your thoughts Kai.
I have invested quite a bit of time reading the CentOS and CentOS-Devel
archives, including
You don't seem to understand. ;-) I don't take your reply as an offense
and I don't mean mine as an offense, but:
If you did your research then you knew what answer you would get. And you
indeed got that answer. And you were not the only one who asked that and
who got that same answer. The
15 matches
Mail list logo
