On 05/30/2010 05:43 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg informed us:
> MHR wrote:
>
>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Robert wrote:
>>
>>> O.K., errands finished, the rebuilt rpm installed using yum --nogpgcheck
>>> localupdate /path/to/rpm with no problems, no dependencies. Mail,
>>> prefere
MHR wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Robert wrote:
>>
>> O.K., errands finished, the rebuilt rpm installed using yum --nogpgcheck
>> localupdate /path/to/rpm with no problems, no dependencies. Mail,
>> preferences, plugins and helpers work as far as I've tested. And email
>> address hin
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Robert wrote:
>
> O.K., errands finished, the rebuilt rpm installed using yum --nogpgcheck
> localupdate /path/to/rpm with no problems, no dependencies. Mail,
> preferences, plugins and helpers work as far as I've tested. And email
> address hinting is fixed! Man
On 05/29/2010 04:36 PM, Robert informed us:
>
> On 05/29/2010 03:35 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg informed us:
>
>> Robert wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5
>>> (32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last
>>> Nove
On 05/29/2010 03:35 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg informed us:
> Robert wrote:
>
>> Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5
>> (32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last
>> November. Sadly, I have no idea where the SRPM originated.
>>
Robert wrote:
> Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5
> (32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last
> November. Sadly, I have no idea where the SRPM originated.
I rebuilt it for x86_64.
The SRPM initially came from a link on the seamonkey w
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Robert wrote:
>
> Yeah, I've been to mozilla.org a couple times today, but I have tried to
> avoid installing from a tarball. I'm paranoid enough about installing from
> 3rd party RPM repos.
Well, okay, but if you trust their product and you trust their source,
On 05/28/2010 01:35 PM, MHR informed us:
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Robert wrote:
>
>> Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5
>> (32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last
>> November. Sadly, I have no idea where the SRPM ori
> Pointers, clues, URLs and remarks about my sanity are equally welcome at
> this point.
This link can be helpful:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2010-April/006998.html
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Robert wrote:
> Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5
> (32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last
> November. Sadly, I have no idea where the SRPM originated.
> I found seamonkey-2.0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm and
Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5
(32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last
November. Sadly, I have no idea where the SRPM originated.
I found seamonkey-2.0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm and
seamonkey-2.0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm, downloaded and got to
11 matches
Mail list logo