Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-30 Thread Robert
On 05/30/2010 05:43 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg informed us: > MHR wrote: > >> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Robert wrote: >> >>> O.K., errands finished, the rebuilt rpm installed using yum --nogpgcheck >>> localupdate /path/to/rpm with no problems, no dependencies. Mail, >>> prefere

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-30 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
MHR wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Robert wrote: >> >> O.K., errands finished, the rebuilt rpm installed using yum --nogpgcheck >> localupdate /path/to/rpm with no problems, no dependencies. Mail, >> preferences, plugins and helpers work as far as I've tested. And email >> address hin

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-30 Thread MHR
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Robert wrote: > > O.K., errands finished, the rebuilt rpm installed using yum --nogpgcheck > localupdate /path/to/rpm with no problems, no dependencies.  Mail, > preferences, plugins and helpers work as far as I've tested.  And email > address hinting is fixed! Man

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-30 Thread Robert
On 05/29/2010 04:36 PM, Robert informed us: > > On 05/29/2010 03:35 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg informed us: > >> Robert wrote: >> >> >>> Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5 >>> (32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last >>> Nove

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-29 Thread Robert
On 05/29/2010 03:35 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg informed us: > Robert wrote: > >> Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5 >> (32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last >> November. Sadly, I have no idea where the SRPM originated. >>

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-29 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Robert wrote: > Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5 > (32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last > November. Sadly, I have no idea where the SRPM originated. I rebuilt it for x86_64. The SRPM initially came from a link on the seamonkey w

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-28 Thread MHR
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Robert wrote: > > Yeah, I've been to mozilla.org a couple times today, but I have tried to > avoid installing from a tarball.  I'm paranoid enough about installing from > 3rd party RPM repos. Well, okay, but if you trust their product and you trust their source,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-28 Thread Robert
On 05/28/2010 01:35 PM, MHR informed us: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Robert wrote: > >> Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5 >> (32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last >> November. Sadly, I have no idea where the SRPM ori

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-28 Thread Ramon Nieto
> Pointers, clues, URLs and remarks about my sanity are equally welcome at > this point. This link can be helpful: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2010-April/006998.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-28 Thread MHR
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Robert wrote: > Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5 > (32-bit)?  I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last > November. Sadly, I have no idea where the SRPM originated. > I found  seamonkey-2.0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm and

[CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-28 Thread Robert
Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5 (32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last November. Sadly, I have no idea where the SRPM originated. I found seamonkey-2.0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm and seamonkey-2.0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm, downloaded and got to