Karanbir Singh wrote:
What sort of machines do you have that you could test on ? there is an
ia64 distro spin running right now, so depending on how that works out
there will be an installable tree ( but no isos ) available for
testing shortly.
SGI Altix 3700 64P x 64GB, SGI Prism 32P x 32GB S
James A. Peltier wrote:
Sorry to be a bit of a stickler, but can we please change the topic for
each architecture. I am monitoring all posts containing IA64 or Itanium
to see when CentOS 5 support will be available and this thread has been
throwing *a lot* of false positives.
What sort of mac
Sorry to be a bit of a stickler, but can we please change the topic for
each architecture. I am monitoring all posts containing IA64 or Itanium
to see when CentOS 5 support will be available and this thread has been
throwing *a lot* of false positives.
Thanks, and again, sorry to be so sticky.
__
Lamar Owen wrote:
> I didn't mention the SUN E5500 and E6500
we might have something that runs on those boxs soon :!
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
[Administrivia: should this be on CentOS-devel instead of the regular CentOS
list? If so, please redirect.]
On Friday 14 September 2007, Lamar Owen wrote:
> Whew. As typical, you have thoroughly thought through things. Let me see
> if the beast will power up and whether the OS/2 console proces
[Veering off-topic; mods, I'll not continue this branch of the thread much
longer]
On Friday 14 September 2007, John R Pierce wrote:
> I've gotten away with running some 208V equipment on a 120V UPS using a
> step-up transformer which had a 208V tap (and 220V, 240V). Of course,
> 3000VA is g
Lamar Owen wrote:
If someone would like to donate a midsized 208VAC-capable (single-phase OK,
but has to be 208 and not 240, or at least jumperable) UPS to the effort,
about a 3000VA unit or so, that would help matters considerably! All my good
UPS's are 120VAC at this point (my one good 208VA
On Tuesday 11 September 2007, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > What is the minimum for actual hardware? I have a small
> > s390 here that I've been looking for a reason to power up.
> > What sort of access is needed?
>
> Goodness ... the Stuff you have in your closet
Steve Rigler wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 16:16 -0700, James A. Peltier wrote:
BTW: Anyone out there have CentOS on SGI Altix?
We have two Altix machines (256p BX2 and 24p 3700) that are still stuck
on SGI PP3 because we're hesitant to go to SuSE. I recall SGI saying
that RHEL 4 (and thus Ce
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 16:16 -0700, James A. Peltier wrote:
> BTW: Anyone out there have CentOS on SGI Altix?
We have two Altix machines (256p BX2 and 24p 3700) that are still stuck
on SGI PP3 because we're hesitant to go to SuSE. I recall SGI saying
that RHEL 4 (and thus CentOS 4) should work bu
"Lamar Owen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
What is the minimum for actual hardware? I have a small s390 here that
I've
been looking for a reason to power up. What sort of access is needed?
<<
Typical install minimum is around 512 MB RAM and a few GB of DASD. If
you're installing in an LPAR you
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Lamar Owen wrote:
What is the minimum for actual hardware? I have a small
s390 here that I've been looking for a reason to power up.
What sort of access is needed?
Goodness ... the Stuff you have in your closet at PARI.
Best as I had roughed out plans for a builder some
Lamar Owen wrote:
What is the minimum for actual hardware? I have a small s390 here that I've
been looking for a reason to power up. What sort of access is needed?
now, I haven't dealt personally with s390 since it was s370 and
punchcards and mag tape were still de rigeur, so the followin
Lamar Owen wrote:
If hardware access is not a possibility, then machines fast enough to run
the emulators might be an option too.
What is the minimum for actual hardware? I have a small s390 here that I've
been looking for a reason to power up. What sort of access is needed?
Well, if we ha
On Tuesday 11 September 2007, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Les Bell wrote:
> > Any word on s390 and s390x? I don't need it myself, but I've been talking
> > to a number of mainframe users recently and they expressed interest.
>
> Provide access to the hardware, and if someone is interested we can look a
Les Bell wrote:
Any word on s390 and s390x? I don't need it myself, but I've been talking
to a number of mainframe users recently and they expressed interest.
Provide access to the hardware, and if someone is interested we can look at it.
If hardware access is not a possibility, then machines
Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
There will be an IA64 CentOS-5 beta soon, and the plan is to have IA64
release
at the same time as i386 and x86_64 for CentOS-5.1.
<<
Any word on s390 and s390x? I don't need it myself, but I've been talking
to a number of mainframe users recently and
James A. Peltier wrote:
Hi All,
I am looking for information on when CentOS 5 will be available for
IA64. I found this forum posting but no responses
There will be an IA64 CentOS-5 beta soon, and the plan is to have IA64 release
at the same time as i386 and x86_64 for CentOS-5.1.
But that
Hi All,
I am looking for information on when CentOS 5 will be available for
IA64. I found this forum posting but no responses
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=8714&forum=45
I am looking to perform a large migration of about 500 workstations from
various Suse and Re
19 matches
Mail list logo
