Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

2008-11-06 Thread Jun Salen
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 21:26, Jun Salen wrote: > > Between Bacula and Backuppc, based on list users experience, which is better > to use? I intend > > to backup both Windows and Linux server. Can I use this to backup my linux > mail server with > > Zimbra services shutdown? Can I use this to back

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

2008-11-05 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:13, Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> IMHO, if you still use tapes, forget the past and move to the future of >> disk-based backups, and adopt Backuppc as your tool. > > There are trade-offs here. Tapes are generally regarded as having a longer > shelf life

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

2008-11-05 Thread Les Mikesell
Paul Heinlein wrote: On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: IMHO, if you still use tapes, forget the past and move to the future of disk-based backups, and adopt Backuppc as your tool. There are trade-offs here. Tapes are generally regarded as having a longer shelf life than disks,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

2008-11-05 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: IMHO, if you still use tapes, forget the past and move to the future of disk-based backups, and adopt Backuppc as your tool. There are trade-offs here. Tapes are generally regarded as having a longer shelf life than disks, and they're less susce

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

2008-11-04 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 21:26, Jun Salen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Between Bacula and Backuppc, based on list users experience, which is better > to use? I intend > to backup both Windows and Linux server. Can I use this to backup my linux > mail server with > Zimbra services shutdown? Can

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

2008-11-04 Thread Jun Salen
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 11:37:17 -0500 From: Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula To: CentOS mailing list Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Les wrote: > >Tronn Wærdahl wrote: >&g

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

2008-11-03 Thread Tronn Wærdahl
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 15:42 +0100, Tronn Wærdahl wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I have a Samba server on CentOS 5.2 that I would like to and some > > backup service to, I have been trying to install Bacula, because I > > wan

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

2008-11-01 Thread Les Mikesell
Tronn Wærdahl wrote: Hi everyone, I have a Samba server on CentOS 5.2 that I would like to and some backup service to, I have been trying to install Bacula, because I want to backup MS machines too, and there is a web GUI. But when searching around i google I get a bit confused. about what pack

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

2008-11-01 Thread Craig White
On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 15:42 +0100, Tronn Wærdahl wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have a Samba server on CentOS 5.2 that I would like to and some > backup service to, I have been trying to install Bacula, because I > want to backup MS machines too, and there is a web GUI. But when > searching around i

[CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and Bacula

2008-11-01 Thread Tronn Wærdahl
Hi everyone, I have a Samba server on CentOS 5.2 that I would like to and some backup service to, I have been trying to install Bacula, because I want to backup MS machines too, and there is a web GUI. But when searching around i google I get a bit confused. about what packages I need. Has anyon