On 12/14/2011 10:55 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> And I worked on Spacewalk in early '09. AAAGHGHGHGHHGHG It
>> went from .3 to .4 while I was trying to implement it, and I think it hit
>> .5 as I left that contract. It was a nightmare to in
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> And I worked on Spacewalk in early '09. AAAGHGHGHGHHGHG It
> went from .3 to .4 while I was trying to implement it, and I think it hit
> .5 as I left that contract. It was a nightmare to install and configure; I
> had to tune the free Orac
Vreme: 12/14/2011 05:58 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Vreme: 12/14/2011 04:07 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
>>> Back in the Fedora docs I found on a google, it mentions that in FC6,
>>> the preferred tool for updates was the "new" yum-updatesd. Anyone know:
>>> a) what the
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 12/14/2011 04:07 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us pie:
>> Back in the Fedora docs I found on a google, it mentions that in FC6,
>> the preferred tool for updates was the "new" yum-updatesd. Anyone know:
>> a) what theological reason upstream had to drop it altogether, and b
Vreme: 12/14/2011 04:07 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
> Back in the Fedora docs I found on a google, it mentions that in FC6, the
> preferred tool for updates was the "new" yum-updatesd. Anyone know: a)
> what theological reason upstream had to drop it altogether, and b) what's
> the recommended repla
Back in the Fedora docs I found on a google, it mentions that in FC6, the
preferred tool for updates was the "new" yum-updatesd. Anyone know: a)
what theological reason upstream had to drop it altogether, and b) what's
the recommended replacement - is it yum-cron?
I hand-update some servers, and o
6 matches
Mail list logo
