On 08/15/2015 08:11 AM, Richard wrote:
>
>
>> Date: Saturday, August 15, 2015 09:57:46 +0100
>> From: Tony Molloy
>>
>> On Saturday 15 August 2015 06:59:36 Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> I had a CentOS 6.5 CD for a clean install, and I did a desktop
>>> install. Then I did
> Date: Saturday, August 15, 2015 09:57:46 +0100
> From: Tony Molloy
>
> On Saturday 15 August 2015 06:59:36 Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I had a CentOS 6.5 CD for a clean install, and I did a desktop
>> install. Then I did a yum update to bring it up to 6.7. So far,
>> so
On Saturday 15 August 2015 06:59:36 Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I had a CentOS 6.5 CD for a clean install, and I did a desktop
> install. Then I did a yum update to bring it up to 6.7. So far, so
> good.
>
> I run a bunch of scientific programs that use C++ compilers and
> li
Hello everyone,
I had a CentOS 6.5 CD for a clean install, and I did a desktop install.
Then I did a yum update to bring it up to 6.7. So far, so good.
I run a bunch of scientific programs that use C++ compilers and libraries.
But, the programs were failing becaause in /usr/lib, the libraries
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:58 PM, wrote:
> >>
>> Heh. If you use gmail's web interface, you don't even care about how
>> someone responds. It will automatically hide the parts you've already
>> seen, regardless of how they are quoted or whether they are
>> above/below the new parts. It replaces
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:25 AM, wrote:
>> >
>> Since I've never used gmail (and refuse to ever do so), I don't know the
>> interface... other that to note that *all* webmail ranges from "mostly
>> useable" (I'm using squirrelmail here at work for my own account) to
>> utterl
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:25 AM, wrote:
> >
> Since I've never used gmail (and refuse to ever do so), I don't know the
> interface... other that to note that *all* webmail ranges from "mostly
> useable" (I'm using squirrelmail here at work for my own account) to
> utterly lousy (i.e., Lookout, er,
Kenny Noe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:43 AM, zGreenfelder
> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:00:08PM -0500, Kenny Noe wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to
>> >> > "bottom" post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail.
>> >> >
>> >> Ar
On Tue, March 4, 2014 19:00, Kenny Noe wrote:
> Mark,
>
> My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to
> "bottom" post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail.
>
> Respectfully --Kenny
>
>
The top-post controversy B.S. is an affectation of the technocratii. Most
business c
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:43 AM, zGreenfelder wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:00:08PM -0500, Kenny Noe wrote:
> >> > Mark,
> >> >
> >> > My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to
> >> > "bottom" post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail.
> >> >
> >> Are you saying
>> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:00:08PM -0500, Kenny Noe wrote:
>> > Mark,
>> >
>> > My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to
>> > "bottom" post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail.
>> >
>> Are you saying the gmail interface gives no way to click at the place where
>> you
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:00:08PM -0500, Kenny Noe wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
> > My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to
> > "bottom" post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail.
> >
> Are you saying the gmail interface
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:48 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/4/2014 4:59 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> Are you saying the gmail interface gives no way to click at the place where
>> you want to type?
>
> the gmail web interface hides the whole replied message and starts you
> at the top. further, it
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:48 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/4/2014 4:59 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> Are you saying the gmail interface gives no way to click at the place where
>> you want to type?
>
> the gmail web interface hides the whole replied message and starts you
> at the top. further, it
On 3/4/2014 4:59 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> Are you saying the gmail interface gives no way to click at the place where
> you want to type?
the gmail web interface hides the whole replied message and starts you
at the top. further, it doesn't > 'quote' the replied text.
--
john r pierce
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:00:08PM -0500, Kenny Noe wrote:
> Mark,
>
> My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to
> "bottom" post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail.
>
Are you saying the gmail interface gives no way to click at the place where
you want to type?
Here
On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 19:00:08 -0500
Kenny Noe wrote:
> My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to
> "bottom" post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail.
There is a cursor-down key (usually indicated by a downward-pointing arrow, and
located on the right-hand side of your ke
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> Mark,
>
> My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to
> "bottom" post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail.
>
You can.
Notice I just did.
Click the ellipsis [...]
Edit accordingly.
Click send.
:)
>
> Respectfully --
Mark,
My apologies for your frustration However I don't see a way to
"bottom" post my replies. FYI... I'm using gmail.
Respectfully --Kenny
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:31 PM, wrote:
> Kenny Noe wrote:
> > My apologies what is top post and how am I doing this?
> >
> > I thought I wa
Thanks will do that
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Thomas Eriksson <
thomas.eriks...@slac.stanford.edu> wrote:
>
>
> On 03/04/2014 02:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > Kenny Noe wrote:
> >> My apologies what is top post and how am I doing this?
> >>
> >> I thought I was just replying
On 03/04/2014 02:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Kenny Noe wrote:
>> My apologies what is top post and how am I doing this?
>>
>> I thought I was just replying to the mailing list... Hit reply and type
>> my message. (I'm such a noobie)
>>
>> I did find dd files that have the driver upda
Kenny Noe wrote:
> My apologies what is top post and how am I doing this?
>
> I thought I was just replying to the mailing list... Hit reply and type
> my message. (I'm such a noobie)
>
> I did find dd files that have the driver update but am lost on trying to
> get these into the install.
My apologies what is top post and how am I doing this?
I thought I was just replying to the mailing list... Hit reply and type
my message. (I'm such a noobie)
I did find dd files that have the driver update but am lost on trying to
get these into the install. Sorry but I don't understand
Kenny Noe wrote:
> The link to the B120i array drivers pointed me to several rpm files that
> contain the driver. The instructions are pretty straight forward and even
> have a back out SOP. OK I've installed rpms before but that's from a
> bootable OS. I don't have that now.. I've searched for
The link to the B120i array drivers pointed me to several rpm files that
contain the driver. The instructions are pretty straight forward and even
have a back out SOP. OK I've installed rpms before but that's from a
bootable OS. I don't have that now.. I've searched for an ISO or other
means to
Kenny Noe wrote:
> Thanks again to all the replies...
>
> If we purchased a "true" HP RAID HW controller, like the P222 512mb FBWC
> or P420 1GB FBWC, would this work? I've read online that folks are having
> troubles with getting drives recognized in CentOS.
>
> Also HP states the fakeraid driver
Thanks again to all the replies...
If we purchased a "true" HP RAID HW controller, like the P222 512mb FBWC
or P420 1GB FBWC, would this work? I've read online that folks are having
troubles with getting drives recognized in CentOS.
Also HP states the fakeraid driver is available for RedHat Linu
From: Kenny Noe
> Well shoot! Thanks for the link. Definitely explains allot! I'm going to
> update the box with the latest HP SPP and double check the updated driver
> is available.
> With this RAID controller and 4x 1TB are there any recommendations on the
> best way to install CentOS? Shou
Hi Kenny,
please follow instructions in given below link;
1.
http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/kb/docDisplay/?spf_p.tpst=kbDocDisplay&spf_p.prp_kbDocDisplay=wsrp-navigationalState%3DdocId%253Demr_na-c03871499-1%257CdocLocale%253D%257CcalledBy%253D&javax.portlet.begCa
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> Well shoot! Thanks for the link. Definitely explains allot! I'm going to
> update the box with the latest HP SPP and double check the updated driver
> is available.
>
> With this RAID controller and 4x 1TB are there any recommendations on the
>
Well shoot! Thanks for the link. Definitely explains allot! I'm going to
update the box with the latest HP SPP and double check the updated driver
is available.
With this RAID controller and 4x 1TB are there any recommendations on the
best way to install CentOS? Should I skip the controller, c
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:14 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/3/2014 11:52 AM, Kenny Noe wrote:
>> HP ML350e G8 servers. They use the HP Dynamic Smart Array B120i raid
>> controllers.
>
> those are, I believe, 'fake raid' interfaces, where the actual raid is
> done in the device driver.
>
> you're
On 3/3/2014 11:52 AM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> HP ML350e G8 servers. They use the HP Dynamic Smart Array B120i raid
> controllers.
those are, I believe, 'fake raid' interfaces, where the actual raid is
done in the device driver.
you're generally better off configuring that sort of interface for JBOD,
That is a software RAID controller, only works if you install HP's
driver first. Or switch to AHCI mode for individual disks.
See this article https://access.redhat.com/site/articles/118133
Thomas
On 03/03/2014 11:57 AM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> Also I have the FBWC module installed to allow R
Also I have the FBWC module installed to allow RAID 5.
--Kenny
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> Here is the system.
>
>
> HP ML350e G8 servers. They use the HP Dynamic Smart Array B120i raid
> controllers.
>
> Thanks! --Kenny
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:07 PM, John R Pi
Here is the system.
HP ML350e G8 servers. They use the HP Dynamic Smart Array B120i raid
controllers.
Thanks! --Kenny
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:07 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/3/2014 10:54 AM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> > OK so what am I doing wrong?? Apparently anaconda is still reading 4
> >
On 3/3/2014 10:54 AM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> OK so what am I doing wrong?? Apparently anaconda is still reading 4
> independent disk instead of a single 3 TB "disk". How do I get the
> installer to recognize the single RAID disk?
not going to read the whole thread, what sort of raid controller does
- Original Message -
| OK so what am I doing wrong?? Apparently anaconda is still reading 4
| independent disk instead of a single 3 TB "disk". How do I get the
| installer to recognize the single RAID disk?
|
| Thanks --Kenny
Sounds to me like it's a FakeRAID (software RAID). What m
os.org] On Behalf
Of SilverTip257
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 12:33 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 install
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:43 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Kenny Noe
>
> > I can RAID all the disk using the HP Array Config tool.
> > I can
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:43 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Kenny Noe
>
> > I can RAID all the disk using the HP Array Config tool.
> > I can load CentOS. The installer sees all 4 disks but the LVM
> recognizes a
> > 3TB volume)
>
> Shouldn't CentOS only see 1 disk (the RAID logical disk made out o
Hi Kenny,
Yes, when you create raid vol over HP array tool. CentOS must get the 1
large hdd/disk. OS doesn't detect what under beneath in this volume and how
many disk they have?
murad
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:43 PM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Kenny Noe
>
> > I can RAID all the disk using the
From: Kenny Noe
> I can RAID all the disk using the HP Array Config tool.
> I can load CentOS. The installer sees all 4 disks but the LVM recognizes a
> 3TB volume)
Shouldn't CentOS only see 1 disk (the RAID logical disk made out of your 4
physical disks)?
JD
_
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Ted Miller
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 8:40 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 install
On 02/26/2014 03:01 PM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> Hello, I'm a newbie so here's my question.
>
> I'm trying to install Ce
On 02/26/2014 03:01 PM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> Hello, I'm a newbie so here's my question.
>
> I'm trying to install CentOS 6.5 on a HP Proliant 350e server. This server
> has 4x 1TB hard drives. I'd like to enable the hardware RAID 5 and stripe
> all 4 disk into one 3TB logical volume. Then install
On 02/28/2014 08:45 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> This keeps /home and /var in separate filesystems, too, and there are
>> advantages to that.
> 'Resize as needed' is not at all the same as sharing a pool of space.
Exactly, and I would posit that
On 02/26/2014 04:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Is there a way to get /home, /var, and /opt installed as directories
> on that other "one big partition"? /var in particular has an odd mix
> of OS and 'your' data and logs that may turn out to be big. And you
> may not know ahead of time what to all
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 02/26/2014 04:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Is there a way to get /home, /var, and /opt installed as directories
>> on that other "one big partition"? /var in particular has an odd mix
>> of OS and 'your' data and logs that may turn out to be
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg <
nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr> wrote:
> On 02/27/2014 08:03 PM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> > Thanks to all the replies... Very interesting stuff... However I'm
> still
> > trying to understand how to have a hardware RAID 5 (4x 1TB disk) system
> an
On 02/27/2014 08:03 PM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> Thanks to all the replies... Very interesting stuff... However I'm still
> trying to understand how to have a hardware RAID 5 (4x 1TB disk) system and
> load CentOS on it. I'm looking for the UEFI bios but don't understand
> this. I want to install LV
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> UEFI can address 4TB.
>> If you are using BIOS, that could be a problem.
>> With 512-byte sectors, 2TB is about the maximum representable offset.
>>
>> BTW all the documentation I've seen about BIOS
>> boot sequences assume
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Kenny Noe wrote:
> Thanks to all the replies... Very interesting stuff... However I'm still
> trying to understand how to have a hardware RAID 5 (4x 1TB disk) system and
> load CentOS on it. I'm looking for the UEFI bios but don't understand
> this. I want to install LVM
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Kenny Noe wrote:
>
>> Thanks to all the replies... Very interesting stuff... However I'm
>> still trying to understand how to have a hardware RAID 5 (4x 1TB disk)
system
>> and load CentOS on it. I'm looking for the UEFI bios but don't understand
>
No I haven't selected any legacy stuff in the bios. Thanks for the
suggestion...
--Kenny
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> > Thanks to all the replies... Very interesting stuff... However I'm
> still
> > trying to un
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Kenny Noe wrote:
> Thanks to all the replies... Very interesting stuff... However I'm still
> trying to understand how to have a hardware RAID 5 (4x 1TB disk) system and
> load CentOS on it. I'm looking for the UEFI bios but don't understand
> this. I want to
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Michael Hennebry
wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Michael Hennebry
>> wrote:
>
>>> Make /home , /var and /opt soft links to directories on /onebigpartition .
>>> I've done similar when I wanted /home off the
Thanks to all the replies... Very interesting stuff... However I'm still
trying to understand how to have a hardware RAID 5 (4x 1TB disk) system and
load CentOS on it. I'm looking for the UEFI bios but don't understand
this. I want to install LVM on top of the single RAID volume, then I can
cr
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Michael Hennebry
> wrote:
>> Make /home , /var and /opt soft links to directories on /onebigpartition .
>> I've done similar when I wanted /home off the root partition,
>> but did not want to give it its own partition.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Michael Hennebry
wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:12 PM, wrote:
>>
> Is there a way to get /home, /var, and /opt installed as directories
>
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:12 PM, wrote:
>
Is there a way to get /home, /var, and /opt installed as directories
on that other "one big partition"? /var in particular has an odd
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:12 PM, wrote:
>>> Is there a way to get /home, /var, and /opt installed as directories
>>> on that other "one big partition"? /var in particular has an odd mix
>>> of OS and 'your' data and logs that may turn
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:12 PM, wrote:
>>>
>> Is there a way to get /home, /var, and /opt installed as directories
>> on that other "one big partition"? /var in particular has an odd mix
>> of OS and 'your' data and logs that may turn out to be big. And you
>> may not know ahead of time what
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:54 PM, wrote:
> You can simply create two virtual disks from the single RAID-5
> volume.
Create one that is like 500GB for the OS volume and then create a 2nd
one which uses the remainder of the space.
>>>
>>> But pay attentio
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:54 PM, wrote:
You can simply create two virtual disks from the single RAID-5 volume.
>>>
>>> Create one that is like 500GB for the OS volume and then create a 2nd
>>> one which uses the remainder of the space.
>>
>> But pay attention to where you'd like /var, /home,
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Drew Weaver
> wrote:
>> You can simply create two virtual disks from the single RAID-5 volume.
>>
>> Create one that is like 500GB for the OS volume and then create a 2nd
>> one which uses the remainder of the space.
>
> But pay attention to w
Make sure that you are booting and installing the system using the UEFI
bios, not the legacy bios. You'll need to check your bios setup for the
setting to do this if the system supports it.
The legacy bios will force the MDOS labeling scheme that will limit the
boot drive to a maximum of 2TB.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Drew Weaver wrote:
> You can simply create two virtual disks from the single RAID-5 volume.
>
> Create one that is like 500GB for the OS volume and then create a 2nd one
> which uses the remainder of the space.
But pay attention to where you'd like /var, /home, /
Kenny Noe
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 3:02 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 install
Hello, I'm a newbie so here's my question.
I'm trying to install CentOS 6.5 on a HP Proliant 350e server. This server has
4x 1TB hard drives. I'd like to enable
Hello, I'm a newbie so here's my question.
I'm trying to install CentOS 6.5 on a HP Proliant 350e server. This server
has 4x 1TB hard drives. I'd like to enable the hardware RAID 5 and stripe
all 4 disk into one 3TB logical volume. Then install CentOS on the 3TB
volume. However after I instal
68 matches
Mail list logo
