On 8/17/20 7:05 PM, david wrote:
> At 07:11 AM 8/17/2020, you wrote:
>> On 8/13/20 11:23 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> > Hey All,
>> >
>> > Is it safe to allow the 193 series kernel update now? Last time I
>> tried
>> > that my system refused to boot. I had to roll back to the 4.18.0-147
>> >
On 8/14/20 12:23 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Hey All,
Is it safe to allow the 193 series kernel update now? Last time I tried
that my system refused to boot. I had to roll back to the 4.18.0-147
kernel to get my machine to reboot.
Since that happened I've been watching this mail list for
At 07:11 AM 8/17/2020, you wrote:
On 8/13/20 11:23 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> Is it safe to allow the 193 series kernel update now? Last time I tried
> that my system refused to boot. I had to roll back to the 4.18.0-147
> kernel to get my machine to reboot.
>
> Since that
On 8/13/20 11:23 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> Is it safe to allow the 193 series kernel update now? Last time I tried
> that my system refused to boot. I had to roll back to the 4.18.0-147
> kernel to get my machine to reboot.
>
> Since that happened I've been watching this mail
On 8/14/20 12:23 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Hey All,
Is it safe to allow the 193 series kernel update now? Last time I tried
that my system refused to boot. I had to roll back to the 4.18.0-147
kernel to get my machine to reboot.
Since that happened I've been watching this mail list for
I was successful in installing the latest updates on a Supermicro
X10SRL-F motherboard with an E5-2630L v4 CPU that uses UEFI for boot.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:24 PM Mark LaPierre wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> Is it safe to allow the 193 series kernel update now? Last time I tried
> that my system
Hey All,
Is it safe to allow the 193 series kernel update now? Last time I tried
that my system refused to boot. I had to roll back to the 4.18.0-147
kernel to get my machine to reboot.
Since that happened I've been watching this mail list for
acknowledgement that the problem has been
7 matches
Mail list logo