Well, first of all, thanks so much for the overwhelming response to my
post.
I got it working and here is what I did;
1 - Get the source from Intel and compile in the same env as the
kickstart OS. You will have an igb.ko file as a result.
2 - Mount the kickstart CD;
a - cd to were you
Hi all,
I've got a Centos 5.1 kickstart that I must continue to use.
How can I update the kick start image so that it recognizes Intel
gigabit 82576 nic?
BTW, I compiled the driver I need and have this igb.ko file.
How do I incorporate that into my initrd.img file that I see on the
Thankyou everyone. I updated the 5.2 kernel onto 5.1 and everything
seems to work fine.
Thanks for all of your help and wisdom.
TIA
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Mag Gam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not an option at my
I know this is a centos forum but I suppose it would be appropriate to
ask a redhat question :-)
Is anyone aware of a NFS client/server problem with Redhat 5.1 where
the client/NFS do extra lookup() and getattr() calls? This is very
similar to CentOS' problem,
Mag Gam wrote:
I know this is a centos forum but I suppose it would be appropriate to
ask a redhat question :-)
Is anyone aware of a NFS client/server problem with Redhat 5.1 where
the client/NFS do extra lookup() and getattr() calls? This is very
similar to CentOS' problem,
Not an option at my university :-(
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mag Gam wrote:
I know this is a centos forum but I suppose it would be appropriate to
ask a redhat question :-)
Is anyone aware of a NFS client/server problem with Redhat 5.1 where
Mag Gam wrote:
Not an option at my university :-(
Then read through the bug report you mentioned and try one of those
kernels. And update to 5.2 - as you won't get *any* security updates for
5.1 anymore except if you bought in for 5.1.z.
And don't top post and please trim your replies.
Ralph
Mag Gam wrote:
Not an option at my university :-(
you mean, your university never installs security patches and updates?!?
5.1-5.2 is as simple as `yum update`
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Mag Gam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not an option at my university :-(
Well you were planning to update the kernel.. you need to get the one from 5.2.
--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:29 AM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mag Gam wrote:
Not an option at my university :-(
you mean, your university never installs security patches and updates?!?
5.1-5.2 is as simple as `yum update`
Or they no longer have RHN access. At which point, it
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Mag Gam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not an option at my university :-(
Then you can try the patched kernel offered by Johnny Hughes:
http://people.centos.org/~hughesjr/kernel/5/bz32/
Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
Greetings.
I am attempting to install 5.1 x86_64, but it is dumping out during the
post-install section.
I was able to send a debug to a remote system. I've never looked
through an install debug log before, but everything seems to be in order
until after the tar install, at which point I
nombre
de Barry Brimer
Enviado el: Martes, 03 de Junio de 2008 04:33 p.m.
Para: CentOS mailing list
Asunto: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1 + Open source CRM
Quoting Test [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 14:53:21 -0300
Masters IT Gmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mastersit.com I hope someone has
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre
de Barry Brimer
Enviado el: Martes, 03 de Junio de 2008 04:33 p.m.
Para: CentOS mailing list
Asunto: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1 + Open source CRM
Quoting Test [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 14:53:21 -0300
Masters IT Gmail [EMAIL
I hope someone has implemented Centos plus some open source crm, what do you
recommend ? I already googled a lot, find a lot of open source related
things but I need to hear from someone who uses it or implemented in the
past to try something like that, I don't have to much experience in nix
world
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 14:53:21 -0300
Masters IT Gmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mastersit.com I hope someone has implemented Centos plus some open source crm,
what do you
mastersit.com recommend ? I already googled a lot, find a lot of open source
related
mastersit.com things but I need to hear
Quoting Test [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 14:53:21 -0300
Masters IT Gmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mastersit.com I hope someone has implemented Centos plus some open source
crm, what do you
mastersit.com recommend ? I already googled a lot, find a lot of open source
related
Jerry Geis wrote:
I have found this link http://owlriver.com/tips/tiny-centos
for installing centos on a minimal system. I am looking at putting
centos on a 1 GIG flash drive. The above page talks about removing
packages after install to attain the small size.
however, I am getting blocked
William L. Maltby wrote:
IIRC, there are several threads about this on the site. I *think* it was
that you need to also unselect individual packages to get a truly
minimal install. Check out the archives.
correct, and you need to run the GUI installer..
--
Karanbir Singh :
I have found this link http://owlriver.com/tips/tiny-centos
for installing centos on a minimal system. I am looking at putting
centos on a 1 GIG flash drive. The above page talks about removing packages
after install to attain the small size.
however, I am getting blocked at the install page
Jerry Geis wrote:
I have found this link http://owlriver.com/tips/tiny-centos
for installing centos on a minimal system. I am looking at putting
centos on a 1 GIG flash drive. The above page talks about removing packages
after install to attain the small size.
however, I am getting blocked at
Jerry Geis wrote:
I have found this link http://owlriver.com/tips/tiny-centos
for installing centos on a minimal system. I am looking at putting
centos on a 1 GIG flash drive. The above page talks about removing
packages
after install to attain the small size.
however, I am getting blocked at
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 16:42 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
snip
however, I am getting blocked at the install page about not enough room
to install.
All I have selected is the base package. nothing else.
Is there a way to install less thank base... I tried to option off
items in the base
Hm... I've yum removed some old kernels in domU and...
they seem to dissappear also in dom0! : Is that
possible?
--
Tomek
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Tomasz Nowak wrote:
Hm... I've yum removed some old kernels in domU and...
they seem to dissappear also in dom0! : Is that
possible?
Only if you were accidentally on the wrong machine at the time.
For example, you were in the 'xm console', but had ssh'd to the
dom0 machine, switched to a
Only if you were accidentally on the wrong machine at the time.
grin
I just did an #init 0 at Dom0's console on my test machine over the weekend and
tanked a handfull of HVM's, heh.
Very easy to do...
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hello,
I successfuly run Centos 5.1 domU in Centos 5.1 dom0.
But I still have some minor issues/errors/warnings while
booting I'd like to fix and here are my questions:
1. How to disable loading usb host controler module:
[...from dmesg... ]
Loading uhci-hcd.ko module
USB Universal Host
It was a hardware problem with my DVD recorder. I got a new one and now
everything works OK.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 15:53:36 Ioannis Vranos wrote:
It was a hardware problem with my DVD recorder. I got a new one and now
everything works OK.
When something that previously worked starts giving you problems it can be
hard to spot. Glad you got it sorted.
Anne
signature.asc
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ioannis Vranos
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 2:54 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 x86 medium installation problems
OS: Ubuntu 7.10 x86.
Unfortunately I still got the problem.
I downloaded the CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image
Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Unfortunately I still got the problem.
:(
vmware version: 6.03 with IDE virtual hard disk.
vmware will let you use an ISO file as a CD-Rom or DVD-Rom drive, try
pointing your vmware instance at the iso file, and bypass the physical
DVD drive in your machine
Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed
sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, installation failed.
Also if I recall correctly, when I tested the medium during install, it
failed although as I said the media was verified.
== The same things happen with
On Monday 07 April 2008 12:38, Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed
sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, installation failed.
Also if I recall correctly, when I tested the medium during install, it
failed although as I
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 07 April 2008 12:38, Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed
sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, installation failed.
Also if I recall correctly, when I tested the medium during install, it
On Monday 07 April 2008 14:19, Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 07 April 2008 12:38, Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed
sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, installation
failed.
Also if I recall
Alan Bartlett wrote:
On 07/04/2008, *Ioannis Vranos* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The same things happen with Scientific Linux 5.1 x86 installation
DVD, so perhaps it is a Red Hat EL 5.1 x86 DVD issue?
This has to be a hardware specific issue as two distros
Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 07 April 2008 14:19, Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 07 April 2008 12:38, Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed
sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it,
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 09:02 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 07 April 2008 14:19, Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 07 April 2008 12:38, Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it
On 07/04/2008, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ALSO ... if doing to VMWare, you can just point to the ISO file as a CDROM
and boot from it directly.
Try to install from that and see if it passes the media test.
That should help determine if the problem is a bad DVD image when burned
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Now I am redownloading the CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD install image, and I will
use the image itself first as a virtual DVD under vmware, and will try
to verify the medium during install and see if it proceeds OK with
installation.
If it succeeds, I will burn it to a DVD-RW and
John wrote:
Here's an issue with Kernel Panics that Ive had. It was not due to bad
media etc.. As it turned out it was the bios settings. Either the Bios
had to be set to Default Settings or APCI had to be turned
off. Also overclocked processors will cause this also and bad ram.
I have not
Correction:
Ioannis Vranos wrote:
John wrote:
Here's an issue with Kernel Panics that Ive had. It was not due to bad
media etc.. As it turned out it was the bios settings. Either the Bios
had to be set to Default Settings or APCI had to be turned
off. Also overclocked processors will cause
Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Now I am redownloading the CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD install image, and I will
use the image itself first as a virtual DVD under vmware, and will try
to verify the medium during install and see if it proceeds OK with
installation.
If it succeeds, I will burn
Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed
sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, installation failed.
ok, I have read all your follow up messages in this thread and you
have'nt actually mentioned how and when the install failed
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ioannis Vranos wrote:
ok, I have read all your follow up messages in this thread and you have'nt
actually mentioned how and when the install failed and with that message.
exactly how are you doing the install ? what
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 17:37 +0300, Ioannis Vranos wrote:
John wrote:
Here's an issue with Kernel Panics that Ive had. It was not due to bad
media etc.. As it turned out it was the bios settings. Either the Bios
had to be set to Default Settings or APCI had to be turned
off. Also
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 16:17 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed
sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, installation failed.
ok, I have read all your follow up messages in this thread and you
Akemi Yagi wrote:
ok, I have read all your follow up messages in this thread and you have'nt
actually mentioned how and when the install failed and with that message.
I also read all his follow up messages. If I understood them
correctly, he was going to use vmware to *test* whether or not
John wrote:
exactly how are you doing the install ? what sort of vmware do you have
setup ? what kind of machine ? using a script / kickstart ? why are you
using a physical media when vmware can directly install from iso. etc.
And dont forget to mention how the install fails.
How about use
Hi to all, maybe someone could help me out, I have installed beryl in centos
5 following directions on internet, configuring repos from fedora core 6 and
I successfully installed it but the problem I have apparently is that it
only works when my resolution is 1024x768 or less, I have a Toshiba
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Masters IT Gmail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a graphic card mobile intel 945gm/gu express. I
have problems too when I want to change resolution to 1440x900, the menu
doesn't show that option the max is 1280 or something like that, well I you
could open my eyes
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 14:38 +0300, Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Hi, I had downloaded CentOS 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passed
sha1sum or md5sum test and I burned it verifying it, installation failed.
Also if I recall correctly, when I tested the medium during install, it
failed although as
Anyone out there using Centos 5.1 asterisk (ztdummy) x86_64,
2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 kernel?
I seem to be having problems with simple playback on asterisk().
If I do the normal service zaptel start (my configs have 0 hardware
cards for asterisk)
ztdummy is loaded and when doing a playback() I
Jerry Geis wrote:
This version of asterisk has always worked for me before on centos 5.1
but now there is a newer kernel.
Any one know anything about this?
I don't run x86_64 on my Asterisk boxes, but I did see an issue like
this under Fedora where multiple drivers were loaded. This was in
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, Mark Rose wrote:
First of all, I was able to use the 5.1 LiveCD to create a bootable USB (8G
Lexar FireFly) - thanks to all for your assistance. Question - has anyone
been able to add NTFS support to an USB install? It would be a nice to have
the ability to access NTFS
Hi All,
Does anyone here on the list have CentOS 5.1 running on a PS3? I would
like to look at integrating a couple of PS3 nodes into our cluster for
it's ability to use the Cell processor inside and was wondering if
anyone had any experiences.
Hi,
i have problem with madwifi driver (ath_pci) version 0.9.4 ,on
CentOs5.1after hibernate wireless devices are not working - i need to
restart them
(ifconfig down/ up or network restart).
Is there any solution?
i am using acpid script which will hibernate on power off button pressed.
It is
Hi
I am finishing my mail server config and just trying to get the mysql
login working - it fails to connect and thorws the following error
Mar 21 21:58:21 mail0 authdaemond: failed to connect to mysql server
(server=localhost, userid=courier): Can't connect to local MySQL server
through
I'm about to try Centos 5 (first time user).
Question: I have the 5.0 CD-ROMs, so can I install with them and them
update to 5.1 via the internet, or should I use the 5.1 CDs?
Thanks.
-Tom
Tom Browder
Niceville, Florida
USA
___
CentOS mailing list
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Tom Browder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm about to try Centos 5 (first time user).
Question: I have the 5.0 CD-ROMs, so can I install with them and them
update to 5.1 via the internet, or should I use the 5.1 CDs?
You can do both, install 5.0 with the CDROM
Tom Browder wrote:
I'm about to try Centos 5 (first time user).
Question: I have the 5.0 CD-ROMs, so can I install with them and them
update to 5.1 via the internet, or should I use the 5.1 CDs?
Thanks.
-Tom
Tom Browder
Niceville, Florida
USA
___
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Tom Browder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm about to try Centos 5 (first time user).
...
If you already have the 5.0 cdroms then it is probably best to do a
minimal install with 5.0 then upgrade to 5.1 and then use yum to
install the actual stuff you need.
Deps. on what kind of hardware you have.
CentOS 5.0 CD installer can not see my SATA harddisk. So I use
CentOS 5.1 CD. If you don't have the same problem I had, you
can do both.
KC
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Tom Browder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Tom
Hi
I am building a new box and i want to get away from hand rolled stuff
this time and i need Postfix with MySQL support compiled in -
Is this available anywhere already built?
thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Tom Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am building a new box and i want to get away from hand rolled stuff
this time and i need Postfix with MySQL support compiled in -
Is this available anywhere already built?
You will find this in the centosplus repository
It seemed both attempts failed due to the installation program couldn't find
either the SATA DVD drive or the SATA hard disk. However, it's hard to
believe Centos 5.1 installation couldn't recognize these two SATA devices.
I'm now stuck. Any suggestion or advice is much appreciated.
CentOS
Chas wrote:
Hi,
Any chance of a CentOS 5.1 single server CD similiar to the one for 4.4?
That CD wa very useful for 90% of the instals that I've been doing and
whatever extras were needed were eaily added through Yum.
yes, the chances are good :D
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/
Thanks. Joseph, my box actually has Windows XP pre-installed (instead of
Vista).
So I'll check that option in my BIOS when I get back home, although I don't
recall I've seen one. I'll also send out an email to this list to ask if
someone else has solved similar problem.
Let me know if there's
Chas a écrit :
Hi,
Any chance of a CentOS 5.1 single server CD similiar to the one for 4.4?
That CD wa very useful for 90% of the instals that I've been doing and
whatever extras were needed were eaily added through Yum.
I'm doing all my installs, be it server or desktop, starting from a
Hi,
Any chance of a CentOS 5.1 single server CD similiar to the one for 4.4?
That CD wa very useful for 90% of the instals that I've been doing and
whatever extras were needed were eaily added through Yum.
Chas.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by
Hi, there,
I just bought a Dell Inspiron 530 with the following basic configuration:
Inspiron 530 Intel Core2 processor Q6600 (2.40Ghz 1066FSB) w/Quad Core
Technology and 8MB cache
SATA 0: Samsung HD501LJ(500GB Serial ATA II Hard Drive(7200RPM))
SATA 1: PDBS DVD +/- RW DH-16W1S (16X
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 16:32 +1100, James Gray wrote:
James
--
Q: What lies on the bottom of the ocean and twitches?
A: A nervous wreck
I had to say thank you for that one! Made me laugh out loud at 05:40
with only one cup of coffee ingested.
--
Bill
Hi All,
This has to be something simplebut it's really busting my chops. We have
a PXE boot server that is used for initial installation of a number of
operating systems and it works well. However the CentOS 5.1 x86_64 install
is seriously broken.
We've made the PXE boot images
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:11:42 pm James Gray wrote:
This is killing us :( The odd thing is the
The last part, after the :(, was not supposed for the e-mail...sometimes
sloppy focus is a little sloppier than my fingers...or maybe the other way
around ;)
James
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 at 5:11pm, James Gray wrote
The installer starts, loads the kickstart script (attached), successfully
verifies the installation media, checks the dependencies for the packages to
be installed, formats the hard drive(s), then attempts to download the
package:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:24:39 am Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 at 5:11pm, James Gray wrote
The installer starts, loads the kickstart script (attached), successfully
verifies the installation media, checks the dependencies for the packages
to be installed, formats the hard
Tom Bishop wrote:
Installing a new system using a 3ware card, raid 5 across 4 disks,
partition, format went smothly and loaded the apps that I need, but
for some reason it appears grub was not installed, or not completely.
I am wanting to boot from the array, when installing grub on the
You can install grub loader on MBR which is safer and will mount the linux
partitions whereever the OS is installed
- Original Message -
From: Jed Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos
Hi
If i want to add X to a system after install on CentOS 4 that would be a
yum install xorg-x11 etc
This package seems to have been renamed in CentOS 5 and i wonder if
anyone can tell me what that now is please
thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Tom Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
If i want to add X to a system after install on CentOS 4 that would be a
yum install xorg-x11 etc
This package seems to have been renamed in CentOS 5 and i wonder if
anyone can tell me what that now is please
run
Tom Brown wrote:
Hi
If i want to add X to a system after install on CentOS 4 that
would be a
yum install xorg-x11 etc
This package seems to have been renamed in CentOS 5 and i wonder if
anyone can tell me what that now is please
yum groupinstall base-x
-Ross
Tom Brown wrote:
Hi
If i want to add X to a system after install on CentOS 4 that would be a
yum install xorg-x11 etc
This package seems to have been renamed in CentOS 5 and i wonder if
anyone can tell me what that now is please
yum groupinstall X Window System
and also pick the GUI
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Tom Brown wrote:
Hi
If i want to add X to a system after install on CentOS 4 that would be
a yum install xorg-x11 etc
This package seems to have been renamed in CentOS 5 and i wonder if
anyone can tell me what that now is please
yum groupinstall X Window System
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Tom Brown wrote:
Hi
If i want to add X to a system after install on CentOS 4 that would be
a yum install xorg-x11 etc
This package seems to have been renamed in CentOS 5 and i wonder if
anyone can tell me what that now is please
Installing a new system using a 3ware card, raid 5 across 4 disks,
partition, format went smothly and loaded the apps that I need, but for some
reason it appears grub was not installed, or not completely. I am wanting
to boot from the array, when installing grub on the loader it asks whether
to
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 at 7:20pm, Tom Bishop wrote
Installing a new system using a 3ware card, raid 5 across 4 disks,
partition, format went smothly and loaded the apps that I need, but for some
reason it appears grub was not installed, or not completely. I am wanting
to boot from the array, when
I have two boxes nearly identical.
I must have a package installed on one and not on the other.
I cannot run a php-curl statement on one, and the other I can.
Doing a google I find that I simply need to install php-common.
According to box that does not work php-common is installed.
What did I
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 11:46 -0500, Dean Maluski wrote:
I have two boxes nearly identical.
I must have a package installed on one and not on the other.
I cannot run a php-curl statement on one, and the other I can.
Doing a google I find that I simply need to install php-common.
According to
Masters IT Gmail wrote:
Sorry to bother I am working with CentOs 5.1 Final running in a virtual
machine using Vmware Workstation Ace edition. I want to know if someone
knows how to configure and if it is possible to enable my wifi card Atheros
AR5006EG in a virtual machine.
You should be able
a big step leaving behind my windows box.
Thanks to all!
George from Uruguay.
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre
de nate
Enviado el: Viernes, 08 de Febrero de 2008 05:49 p.m.
Para: centos@centos.org
Asunto: Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.1 Vmware
Alrighty. I'm having a hell of a time and I need help. I'll try to
give as much information as possible.
--
HARDWARE
--
MB:
Supermicro PDSBM-LN2+
Intel 946GZ
ICH7R + Intel® 82573
Memory:
Crucial 512Mb, 1Gb, 2Gb modules matched to above MB.
Processors:
Intel Celeron 420
Ken Price wrote:
Anyone out there with similar problems and/or workarounds? Any ideas?
install using a serial console, and capture the entire kernel panic
from the console if you can. Have you tried any disk controllers other
than the promise ?
For me, if hardware SATA raid, it's 3Ware or
Ken Price wrote:
Anyone out there with similar problems and/or workarounds? Any ideas?
install using a serial console, and capture the entire kernel panic
from the console if you can. Have you tried any disk controllers other
than the promise ?
For me, if hardware SATA raid, it's 3Ware or
ICH7R + Intel® 82573
Memory:
Crucial 512Mb, 1Gb, 2Gb modules matched to above MB.
according to Intel, this chipset supports DDR2 667Mhz memory only. if
you're using two dimms they should be matched pairs for dual channel
operation?
Yes. I'm using matched pairs of DDR2 667Mhz. Hmmm.
another distro in production systems.
-Ken
- Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:56:58 -0500
From: Ken Price [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 Core 2 Duo Install freezes
To: CentOS
Ken Price wrote:
ICH7R + Intel® 82573
Memory:
Crucial 512Mb, 1Gb, 2Gb modules matched to above MB.
according to Intel, this chipset supports DDR2 667Mhz memory only. if
you're using two dimms they should be matched pairs for dual channel
operation?
Yes. I'm using matched pairs of DDR2
Centos 5.1 documentation states that the supported ext3 filesystem limit
is 16TB, yet I have a 9.5TB partition that is claimed to be too large:
mke2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006)
mke2fs: Filesystem too large. No more than 2**31-1 blocks
(8TB using a blocksize of 4k) are currently supported.
On Feb 7, 2008 8:17 PM, Gary Molenkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Centos 5.1 documentation states that the supported ext3 filesystem limit
is 16TB, yet I have a 9.5TB partition that is claimed to be too large:
mke2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006)
mke2fs: Filesystem too large. No more than 2**31-1
On Feb 7, 2008 2:17 PM, Gary Molenkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Centos 5.1 documentation states that the supported ext3 filesystem limit
is 16TB, yet I have a 9.5TB partition that is claimed to be too large:
mke2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006)
mke2fs: Filesystem too large. No more than 2**31-1 blocks
Hello list,
Can anyone confirm if CentOS 5.1 works happily on a Dell R200 with a SAS
6iR RAID controller.
Thanks
Dean
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
