Sorry for the late reply, I had to go away.
> > >
> > >
> > > It's where tracker extracts files.
> > >
> > > Google for "centos7 tracker disable"
> > >
> > > I suspect the lu*.tmp directories are from when tracker uses LO to
> > > extract and index documents.
> > >
> > > If you don't use,
On 08/18/2017 11:12 AM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Yan Li wrote:
>
>> After this call, I need to schedule a meeting with a partner in London
>> so I pressed the start key and typed in "london". Tracker showed the
>> current time and I could
On 08/18/2017 02:12 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Yan Li wrote:
After this call, I need to schedule a meeting with a partner in London
so I pressed the start key and typed in "london". Tracker showed the
current time and I could press
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Yan Li wrote:
> After this call, I need to schedule a meeting with a partner in London
> so I pressed the start key and typed in "london". Tracker showed the
> current time and I could press enter to see the weather in London.
Now
On 08/18/2017 03:33 AM, ken wrote:
> On 08/17/2017 11:19 PM, Yan Li wrote:
>> On 08/17/2017 05:05 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
>>> Hmm. was unaware of tracker-etc. what are these indexes used for?
>>> I can't think of anything I do on the system that would need to know
>>> all bout some arbitrary file
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 03:49:19PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
> in /tmp I found files of names...
> systemd-private--colord and rtkit
> I have never seen these files before.
Unrelated to the disk space issues, but the systemd-private-*
directories are created by systemd services that have
On 08/17/2017 11:19 PM, Yan Li wrote:
On 08/17/2017 05:05 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
Hmm. was unaware of tracker-etc. what are these indexes used for?
I can't think of anything I do on the system that would need to know
all bout some arbitrary file somewhere on the filesysystem, so why
would this be
On 08/17/2017 05:05 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> Hmm. was unaware of tracker-etc. what are these indexes used for?
> I can't think of anything I do on the system that would need to know
> all bout some arbitrary file somewhere on the filesysystem, so why
> would this be useful?
>
> thanks in advance!
>
> A more interesting question would be: Where would one go to completely
> STOP these files from being created / cached / logged / stored etc?
>
In Gnome 3.
1. Got o Settings
2. Select Search
3. Un-check all the things you don't want to be tracked or just turn search off.
On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 20:05 -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:46:12PM +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 16:01 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a listing.
> > >
> > > total 44
> > > drwx-- 2 rootroot 6 Aug 17 15:36
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:46:12PM +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 16:01 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
> > This is a listing.
> >
> > total 44
> > drwx-- 2 rootroot 6 Aug 17 15:36 lu26465gujqup.tmp
> > drwx-- 2 rootroot8192 Aug 17 15:37 lu27063gukci0.tmp
> >
On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 16:01 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
> This is a listing.
>
> total 44
> drwx-- 2 rootroot 6 Aug 17 15:36 lu26465gujqup.tmp
> drwx-- 2 rootroot8192 Aug 17 15:37 lu27063gukci0.tmp
> drwx-- 2 rootroot8192 Aug 17 15:43 lu3205guot5q.tmp
>
On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 16:16 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
> It looks like its these files:
> drwx-- 2 rootroot8192 Aug 17 16:11 lu10398gvo2au.tmp
> drwx-- 2 rootroot8192 Aug 17 16:14 lu3245gvrkvp.tmp
> drwx-- 2 rootroot4096 Aug 17 16:14 lu4298gvwjcr.tmp
>
> That
Jerry Geis wrote:
> It looks like its these files:
> drwx-- 2 rootroot8192 Aug 17 16:11 lu10398gvo2au.tmp
> drwx-- 2 rootroot8192 Aug 17 16:14 lu3245gvrkvp.tmp
> drwx-- 2 rootroot4096 Aug 17 16:14 lu4298gvwjcr.tmp
>
> That just keep growing and "many" files in
It looks like its these files:
drwx-- 2 rootroot8192 Aug 17 16:11 lu10398gvo2au.tmp
drwx-- 2 rootroot8192 Aug 17 16:14 lu3245gvrkvp.tmp
drwx-- 2 rootroot4096 Aug 17 16:14 lu4298gvwjcr.tmp
That just keep growing and "many" files in each directory.
Over time it
This is a listing.
total 44
drwx-- 2 rootroot 6 Aug 17 15:36 lu26465gujqup.tmp
drwx-- 2 rootroot8192 Aug 17 15:37 lu27063gukci0.tmp
drwx-- 2 rootroot8192 Aug 17 15:43 lu3205guot5q.tmp
drwx-- 2 rootroot8192 Aug 17 15:48 lu4177guts1n.tmp
drwx--
I have a Centos 7 install that seems to be filling up disk space to 100% on
the root partition.
in /tmp I found files of names...
systemd-private--colord and rtkit
I have never seen these files before.
there were also files of X.tmpin the /tmp folder.
Why are these files
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 09:28:03AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Yes but .. closest mirror only gets as detailed as per country.
Maybe my question was not clear: the problem is that the install (when
doing a virt-install with boot.iso) does not choose a mirror at all.
It just requires that
On 06/05/2017 09:28 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 06/04/2017 10:29 AM, Jos Vos wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Do CentOS 7 installs not automatically use a closest mirror for
>> installing like Fedora does, or is that due to the way I'm starting
>> the install (virt-install)?
>>
>> Background:
>>
>> I'm
On 06/04/2017 10:29 AM, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do CentOS 7 installs not automatically use a closest mirror for
> installing like Fedora does, or is that due to the way I'm starting
> the install (virt-install)?
>
> Background:
>
> I'm trying to find the best way to do installs using basic
Hi,
Do CentOS 7 installs not automatically use a closest mirror for
installing like Fedora does, or is that due to the way I'm starting
the install (virt-install)?
Background:
I'm trying to find the best way to do installs using basic local media
(network install, but *without* the need to
Hi,
It's all in the documentation from Red Hat.
kickstart snip
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/Installation_Guide/sect-kickstart-examples.html
manual partitionning
First let me say I am not a true expert, but I am experienced.
If this machine you purchased was some name brand, you must be speaking
about hardware raid, true? If this is true, it normally presents you
with what looks like a standard drive (/dev/sda) for every 2 drives
configured as raid-1.
In article <5ef97952-14c0-6ad2-0803-c24691a68...@gmail.com>,
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/26/2017 01:40 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> > Anaconda doesn't set up the boot sector on the second drive by default,
> > so I put some grub commands in the post-install section of
On 01/26/2017 01:40 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
Anaconda doesn't set up the boot sector on the second drive by default,
so I put some grub commands in the post-install section of kickstart
to do so.
I can't attest that it *works* (mostly since I use UEFI everywhere
possible) but anaconda
In article <1485416344.2047.1.ca...@biggs.org.uk>,
Pete Biggs wrote:
>
> >
> > If you are using RAID 1 kernel mirroring, you can do that with /boot too,
> > and Grub finds the kernel just fine. I've done it many times:
> >
> >
> Hmm, OK. I wonder why anaconda doesn't do it
>
> If you are using RAID 1 kernel mirroring, you can do that with /boot too,
> and Grub finds the kernel just fine. I've done it many times:
>
>
Hmm, OK. I wonder why anaconda doesn't do it then.
Reading various websites, it looks like grub2 can do it, but you have
to make sure that various
On 26/01/17 05:46, Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article <1485342377.3072.6.ca...@biggs.org.uk>,
Pete Biggs wrote:
On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 17:14 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
So, it installed happily.
Then wouldn't boot. No problem, I'll bring it up with pxe, then chroot and
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> You didn't answer all of the questions I asked, but I'll answer as best
> I can with the information you gave.
>
Manitu ate my email, *again*.
> On 01/25/2017 04:47 AM, mark wrote:
>>
>> Made an md RAID 0 on the raw disks - /dev/sda /dev/sdb. No partitions,
>> nothing.
>
>
You didn't answer all of the questions I asked, but I'll answer as best
I can with the information you gave.
On 01/25/2017 04:47 AM, mark wrote:
Made an md RAID 0 on the raw disks - /dev/sda /dev/sdb. No partitions,
nothing.
OK, so right off the bat we have to note that this is not a
In article <1485342377.3072.6.ca...@biggs.org.uk>,
Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 17:14 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > So, it installed happily.
> >
> > Then wouldn't boot. No problem, I'll bring it up with pxe, then chroot and
> > grub2-install.
> >
> > Um,
On Wed, January 25, 2017 9:51 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Let me see if I can, um, reboot this thread
>
> I made a RAID 1 of two raw disks, /dev/sda and /dev/sdb, *not* /dev/sdax
> /dev/sdbx. Then I installed CentOS 7 on the RAID, with /boot, /, and swap
> being partitions on the RAID. My
Let me see if I can, um, reboot this thread
I made a RAID 1 of two raw disks, /dev/sda and /dev/sdb, *not* /dev/sdax
/dev/sdbx. Then I installed CentOS 7 on the RAID, with /boot, /, and swap
being partitions on the RAID. My problem is that grub2-install absolutely
and resolutely refuses to
On 01/24/17 19:00, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 01/24/2017 02:14 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
So, it installed happily.
Then wouldn't boot.
What did the storage configuration look like, exactly? I'd guess that you put
one partition on each disk, combined those in a RAID1 MD array, made than an
On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 17:14 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> So, it installed happily.
>
> Then wouldn't boot. No problem, I'll bring it up with pxe, then chroot and
> grub2-install.
>
> Um, nope. I edited the device map from hd0 and hd1 being the RAID to
> /dev/sda and /dev/sdb, then ran
On Tue, January 24, 2017 4:14 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> So, it installed happily.
>
> Then wouldn't boot. No problem, I'll bring it up with pxe, then chroot and
> grub2-install.
>
> Um, nope. I edited the device map from hd0 and hd1 being the RAID to
> /dev/sda and /dev/sdb, then ran
So, it installed happily.
Then wouldn't boot. No problem, I'll bring it up with pxe, then chroot and
grub2-install.
Um, nope. I edited the device map from hd0 and hd1 being the RAID to
/dev/sda and /dev/sdb, then ran grup2-install. It now tells me can't
identify the filesystem on hd0, and can't
On Tue, January 24, 2017 1:10 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> On 01/24/2017 08:33 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> I'm building a new box, and I want three partitions - /boot, /, and
>>> swap, on*one* RAID 1, not three separate partitions. Other than
>>> mdadm...,*is*
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/24/2017 08:33 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I'm building a new box, and I want three partitions - /boot, /, and
>> swap, on*one* RAID 1, not three separate partitions. Other than
>> mdadm...,*is* there any way in the graphical installer to do
>> this? All I
On 01/24/2017 08:33 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm building a new box, and I want three partitions - /boot, /, and
swap, on*one* RAID 1, not three separate partitions. Other than
mdadm...,*is* there any way in the graphical installer to do
this? All I see is a way to make three separate
> Am 24.01.2017 um 17:33 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
> I'm building a new box, and I want three partitions - /boot, /, and swap, on
> *one* RAID 1, not three separate partitions.
the first sentence is in conflict with the last one ("I want three partitions"
vs. "not three separate partitions")
Hi, folks,
I'm building a new box, and I want three partitions - /boot, /, and
swap, on *one* RAID 1, not three separate partitions. Other than
mdadm..., *is* there any way in the graphical installer to do
this? All I see is a way to make three separate partitions.
Pointers to links
Install the 'ntfs-3g' package from EPEL and re-run grub2-mkconfig to generate
the grub.cfg in the appropriate place (uefi or legacy boot).
--
Jonathan Billings
> On Jun 19, 2016, at 15:56, Bachir Bachir wrote:
>
> Dear all,I installed centos 7 on the second disk of my
Dear all,I installed centos 7 on the second disk of my Asus laptop. The laptop
i have has two SSD disks 240 G and 480G consecutively the fist disk (240)
has already windows 10 installed on , the second disk now has Centos 7
installed on.while insalling Centos 7 i let the bootloader part and
For RAID-1 on CentOS 7, have a look at the following:
http://binblog.info/2014/10/25/centos-7-on-md-raid-1/
It deals with the situation, including mirroring of /boot. Note
that in my case, I disabled UEFI in the BIOS, so didn't have
/boot/efi come up on autopartition.
That URL also implies a
On 12/06/2014 08:32 AM, Ted Miller wrote:
2. I cannot comment from experience about the separate drive for
/boot/efi, but needing a separate partition surprises me. I have not
read about others needing that. I would think that having an
accessible /boot partition would suffice.
Systems
A few comments in-line and at the bottom.
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 11:32:24 -0500
From: Ted Miller tedli...@sbcglobal.net
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 install software Raid on large drives
error
On 12/05/2014 01:50 PM, Jeff Boyce wrote:
- Original Message - From
On 12/05/2014 01:50 PM, Jeff Boyce wrote:
- Original Message - From: Mark Milhollan m...@pixelgate.net
To: Jeff Boyce jbo...@meridianenv.com
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 install software Raid on large drives error
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Mark Milhollan m...@pixelgate.net
To: Jeff Boyce jbo...@meridianenv.com
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 install software Raid on large drives error
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Jeff Boyce wrote:
I am trying to install
Greetings -
I am trying to install CentOS 7 into a new Dell Precision 3610. I have two
3 TB drives that I want to setup in software RAID1. I followed the guide
here for my install as it looked fairly detailed and complete
(http://www.ictdude.com/howto/install-centos-7-software-raid-lvm/).
On Dec 3, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Jeff Boyce jbo...@meridianenv.com wrote:
My objective is to RAID1 the two drives, use LVM on top of the RAID
btrfs will meet both your functional objectives (mirroring, management, and
expandability) and should be simpler to set up within the CentOS 7 installer.
51 matches
Mail list logo