Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 at 03:44 -, Rob Kampen wrote: > On 16/01/17 17:12, James A. Peltier wrote: > > VLANs are your friend, otherwise DHCPD is not going to understand how to > > properly answer your request for different networks on the same interface. Be careful about expecting VLANs to

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

On 1/16/2017 1:29 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: On 16/01/17 21:54, John R Pierce wrote: On 1/16/2017 12:44 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: Here's an idea - untested. set up a network on the single nic - say 192.168.55.xx/24 set up the dhcp to offer leases from a subset of this network - say 192.168.55.128/28

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

On 16/01/17 21:54, John R Pierce wrote: On 1/16/2017 12:44 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: Here's an idea - untested. set up a network on the single nic - say 192.168.55.xx/24 set up the dhcp to offer leases from a subset of this network - say 192.168.55.128/28 set up fixed leases based upon mac

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

On 1/16/2017 12:44 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: Here's an idea - untested. set up a network on the single nic - say 192.168.55.xx/24 set up the dhcp to offer leases from a subset of this network - say 192.168.55.128/28 set up fixed leases based upon mac address from the remainder of the network -

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

On 16/01/17 17:12, James A. Peltier wrote: VLANs are your friend, otherwise DHCPD is not going to understand how to properly answer your request for different networks on the same interface. - On 14 Jan, 2017, at 11:59, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote: | Everyone, | | I am trying

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

VLANs are your friend, otherwise DHCPD is not going to understand how to properly answer your request for different networks on the same interface. - On 14 Jan, 2017, at 11:59, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote: | Everyone, | | I am trying to set up a second internal network

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

On 1/15/2017 10:19 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Thank you for such a good explanation. It seems apparent to me that a better way to do what I wanted would be to have two wireless routers, one wifi being controlled by the dhcpd server that assigns ip addresses through it to known and trusted

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:05:37 -0800 On 01/15/2017 10:19 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > It seems apparent to me that a > better way to do what I wanted would be to have two wireless routers, > one wifi being controlled by the dhcpd server that assigns ip addresses > through it to known and

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

On 01/15/2017 10:19 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: It seems apparent to me that a better way to do what I wanted would be to have two wireless routers, one wifi being controlled by the dhcpd server that assigns ip addresses through it to known and trusted connections with one subnet, and the other

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

On 01/15/2017 09:11 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > All I can say is that when I looked at the dhcpd.conf examples and read > the man pages as well as the explanations of how dhcpd works, we should > be able to use dhcpd for more than one subnet : You can, provided they're on different physical

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

On 01/15/2017 09:11 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: All I can say is that when I looked at the dhcpd.conf examples and read the man pages as well as the explanations of how dhcpd works, we should be able to use dhcpd for more than one subnet : You can, provided they're on different physical

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 11:57:35 -0500 > I have not been able to make any headway resolving this problem; Personally, I don't understand how you expect the DHCP server to decide which scope to use when a new connection appears on the network. DHCP discovery queries are presented from 0.0.0.0 to

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

> I have not been able to make any headway resolving this problem; Personally, I don't understand how you expect the DHCP server to decide which scope to use when a new connection appears on the network. DHCP discovery queries are presented from 0.0.0.0 to 255.255.255.255, not to a particular

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

Everyone, I am trying to set up a second internal network (192.168.0.0/24) and have not been able to get dhcp to start when I have the following in my dhcpd.conf file : subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 192.168.0.110 192.168.0.130; option subnet-mask

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

Everyone, I am trying to set up a second internal network (192.168.0.0/24) and have not been able to get dhcp to start when I have the following in my dhcpd.conf file : subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 192.168.0.110 192.168.0.130; option subnet-mask

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

On 14 Jan 2017 8:01 pm, "Gregory P. Ennis" wrote: Everyone, I am trying to set up a second internal network (192.168.0.0/24) and have not been able to get dhcp to start when I have the following in my dhcpd.conf file : subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range

[CentOS] Centos 7 dhcpd failure to allow a 2nd network over same interal nic

Everyone, I am trying to set up a second internal network (192.168.0.0/24) and have not been able to get dhcp to start when I have the following in my dhcpd.conf file : subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 192.168.0.110 192.168.0.130; option subnet-mask