On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 13:27, Brent L. Bates wrote:
> Just noticed something. Have your serial number reflect the date you
> last updated the file. That way you will know when you last changed it. For
> example, today is September 27, 2010, if you were making your first update
> today, mak
I think you should be able to do this using BIND views with
match-destinations. Have one view match destinations for 1.1.1.1 and
1.1.1.2 and the other for 1.1.1.3 and 1.1.1.4. Create a zone in one
view for exampleA.com and one in the other for exampleB.com
Ryan
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Do
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 18:15, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> For completeness: there is the BIND 9 Administrator Reference Manual,
>> known as the ARM, usually supplied under /usr/share/doc/.
>> And what many consider to be the standard reference, Liu and Albitz's
>> "DNS and BIND" published by O'Reilly.
On 9/24/10 11:12 PM, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:28:41PM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:24, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>>> http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/
>>>
>>> That is a good source to read up about bind configuration.
>>>
>>> As a sidenote pl
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:28:41PM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:24, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> > http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/
> >
> > That is a good source to read up about bind configuration.
> >
> > As a sidenote please be aware, that if someone directly queries your
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 00:06, Robert Heller wrote:
> When you have an $ORIGIN statement, it defines a suffix to automatically
> add to any name that does not end in a '.'. You can do either,
> depending on how gratiously verbose you want to be. Of course, being
> verbose sort of defeats the who
At Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:02:21 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:41, Robert Heller wrote:
> > You need:
> >
> > ns1.exampleA.com. IN Â Â Â A Â Â Â 1.1.1.1
> > ns2.exampleA.com. IN Â Â Â A Â Â Â 1.1.1.2
> >
>
> Here I have found conflicting information, it
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 23:29, James A. Peltier wrote:
> Looks good. you can change your 10800 3600 604800 and 38400 to hours, days
> or weeks represented by 1h, 1d or 1w respectively to make it easier than
> calculating seconds. :)
>
Thank you!
--
Dotan Cohen
http://gibberish.co.il
http:/
- Original Message -
| All right, I think this should do it:
|
| $ORIGIN exampleA.com.
| $TTL 86400
| exampleA.com. IN SOA ns1.exampleA.com. ns2.exampleA.com. (
| 2; Serial - increment me
| 10800
| 3600
| 604800
| 38400 )
| IN NS ns1.exampleA.com.
| IN NS ns2.exampleA.com.
| IN A 178.63.65
All right, I think this should do it:
$ORIGIN exampleA.com.
$TTL 86400
exampleA.com. IN SOA ns1.exampleA.com. ns2.exampleA.com. (
2; Serial - increment me
10800
3600
604800
On 9/24/2010 4:02 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:41, Robert Heller wrote:
>> You need:
>>
>> ns1.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.1
>> ns2.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.2
>>
>
> Here I have found conflicting information, it seems that some sources
> suggest this inste
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 23:13, James A. Peltier wrote:
> | > You need:
> | >
> | > ns1.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.1
> | > ns2.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.2
> | >
> |
> | Here I have found conflicting information, it seems that some sources
> | suggest this instead:
> | ns1 IN A 1.1.1.1
> | ns2 IN A 1.
- Original Message -
| - Original Message -
| | On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:41, Robert Heller
| | wrote:
| | > You need:
| | >
| | > ns1.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.1
| | > ns2.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.2
| | >
| |
| | Here I have found conflicting information, it seems that some
| |
- Original Message -
| On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:41, Robert Heller
| wrote:
| > You need:
| >
| > ns1.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.1
| > ns2.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.2
| >
|
| Here I have found conflicting information, it seems that some sources
| suggest this instead:
| ns1 IN A 1.1.1.1
|
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:47, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I think that's reasonable - but note that from the rest of the world's
> perspective the ns1, ns2 IP's are going to come from the glue records
> from the upstream DNS that would have been added when you registered the
> servers as primary for th
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:41, Robert Heller wrote:
> With the rest of the IN A records for exampleA.com (and correspondingly
> for exampleB.com). You need *addresses* for your name servers as well
> as for your web servers.
I see.
> And you might also want to have www.
> address records as w
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:41, Robert Heller wrote:
> You need:
>
> ns1.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.1
> ns2.exampleA.com. IN A 1.1.1.2
>
Here I have found conflicting information, it seems that some sources
suggest this instead:
ns1 IN A 1.1.1.1
ns2 I
On 9/24/2010 3:39 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:24, Robert Heller wrote:
>>> So, then, the association of a FQDN with any particular IP address is
>>> only done in the domain name's control panel where the nameservers are
>>> set?
>>
>> It is in bind's database (zone files).
At Fri, 24 Sep 2010 22:12:44 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:06, James A. Peltier wrote:
> > formatting for NS records is incorrect. Â It should just read
> >
> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â NS ns1.exampleA.com.
> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â NS ns2.exampleA.com.
At Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:58:09 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Thank you for all the help so far. To conclude:
> I have one physical server that answers to the following IP addresses:
> 1.1.1.1
> 1.1.1.2
> 1.1.1.3
> 1.1.1.4
>
> I need 1.1.1.1 & 1.1.1.2 to be the name servers for exampleA.co
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:24, Robert Heller wrote:
>> So, then, the association of a FQDN with any particular IP address is
>> only done in the domain name's control panel where the nameservers are
>> set?
>
> It is in bind's database (zone files). In named.conf you associate
> domains (all but
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:24, Robert Heller wrote:
> Which is still meaningless. Some name servers serve *hundreds* of web
> sites, many competing with each other. Often large hosting companies
> will serve hundreds of web sites, all with the *same* IP address and
> many in competion with each
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:24, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/
>
> That is a good source to read up about bind configuration.
>
> As a sidenote please be aware, that if someone directly queries your
> ns1.exampleA.com for exampleB.com zone records he will get proper
> an
At Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:05:25 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 20:18, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > Probably a waste of time. Â If anyone cares, they'll track down the
> > domain and IP range ownership anyway (there are sites that do it
> > automatically). Â So unless you'
At Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:43:11 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 19:38, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > You are making it much more complicated than necessary.
>
> That is what I suspected! I know that when Linux gets difficult, it is
> because I'm doing it wrong!
>
>
> > I
Am 24.09.2010 22:12, schrieb Dotan Cohen:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:06, James A. Peltier wrote:
>> formatting for NS records is incorrect. It should just read
>>
>> NS ns1.exampleA.com.
>> NS ns2.exampleA.com.
>>
>
> Thanks. (I added the periods)
>
>> wher
Ah, some better examples here:
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/s1-bind-zone.html
How is this file:
# cat /var/named/exampleA.com.hosts
$ORIGIN exampleA.com.
$TTL 1h
exampleA.com. IN SOA ns1.exampleA.com. ns2.exampleA.com. (
1; Serial - in
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:06, James A. Peltier wrote:
> formatting for NS records is incorrect. It should just read
>
> NS ns1.exampleA.com.
> NS ns2.exampleA.com.
>
Thanks. (I added the periods)
> where is your ns1.exampleA.com entry?
> where is your ns2.ex
- Original Message -
| - Original Message -
| | Thank you for all the help so far. To conclude:
| | I have one physical server that answers to the following IP
| | addresses:
| | 1.1.1.1
| | 1.1.1.2
| | 1.1.1.3
| | 1.1.1.4
| |
| | I need 1.1.1.1 & 1.1.1.2 to be the name servers fo
- Original Message -
| Thank you for all the help so far. To conclude:
| I have one physical server that answers to the following IP addresses:
| 1.1.1.1
| 1.1.1.2
| 1.1.1.3
| 1.1.1.4
|
| I need 1.1.1.1 & 1.1.1.2 to be the name servers for exampleA.com, and
| 1.1.1.3 & 1.1.1.4 to be the
Thank you for all the help so far. To conclude:
I have one physical server that answers to the following IP addresses:
1.1.1.1
1.1.1.2
1.1.1.3
1.1.1.4
I need 1.1.1.1 & 1.1.1.2 to be the name servers for exampleA.com, and
1.1.1.3 & 1.1.1.4 to be the nameservers for exampleB.com. I have these
files:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 20:18, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Probably a waste of time. If anyone cares, they'll track down the
> domain and IP range ownership anyway (there are sites that do it
> automatically). So unless you've used company aliases in the domain
> registration and gotten separate isp c
On 9/24/2010 1:07 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>
>> But any
>> instance of bind can be primary for any number of domains. The
>> association with the IP address(es) that will receive the queries
>> happens when you register the domain into the public dns system and you
>> can register the same server(
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 19:59, Les Mikesell wrote:
> What's a control panel?
It is the web-based interface for the domain name registrar, in which
one configures the name servers for the domain name that he bought
from them.
> Bind is going to want a zone file for each
> domain where it is the
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 19:49, James A. Peltier wrote:
> BIND has listen on directives as well, but if this is a single box
> configuration
> it's not necessarily required as it will listen on all interfaces.
>
Yes, I actually do want it to listen on all addresses (only one NIC),
I don't know wh
On 9/24/2010 12:43 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>
>> and bind to listen on all addresses and
>> answer for all your domains.
>>
>
> So, then, the association of a FQDN with any particular IP address is
> only done in the domain name's control panel where the nameservers are
> set?
What's a control panel
- Original Message -
| > Have a read for the listen on directive for BIND which tells BIND
| > what
| > interfaces/IP Addresses to bind to.
|
| Thanks, I am aware that Apache can be told to listen only to specific
| addresses. Can BIND be told to listen on all addresses? Your post
| impl
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 19:38, Les Mikesell wrote:
> You are making it much more complicated than necessary.
That is what I suspected! I know that when Linux gets difficult, it is
because I'm doing it wrong!
> I'd configure
> apache to use named virtual hosts and listen on all addresses (but yo
On 9/24/2010 12:21 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>> Have a read for the listen on directive for BIND which tells BIND what
>> interfaces/IP Addresses to bind to.
>
> Thanks, I am aware that Apache can be told to listen only to specific
> addresses. Can BIND be told to listen on all addresses? Your post
>
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 19:26, Eric Viseur wrote:
> Maybe a Round-Robin configuration ?
>
Thank you Eric, but I may have been unclear. There is only one
physical server, but it answers to four IP addresses.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
Maybe a Round-Robin configuration ?
2010/9/24 Dotan Cohen
> > Have a read for the listen on directive for BIND which tells BIND what
> > interfaces/IP Addresses to bind to.
>
> Thanks, I am aware that Apache can be told to listen only to specific
> addresses. Can BIND be told to listen on all ad
> Have a read for the listen on directive for BIND which tells BIND what
> interfaces/IP Addresses to bind to.
Thanks, I am aware that Apache can be told to listen only to specific
addresses. Can BIND be told to listen on all addresses? Your post
implies that this is the default (which makes sense
- Original Message -
| On a CentOS 5 server, I am having a hard time configuring BIND to
| answer to 4 IP addresses for 2 domain names.
|
| Currently, I have four IP addresses, for sake of discussion they are:
| 1.1.1.1
| 1.1.1.2
| 1.1.1.3
| 1.1.1.4
|
| Additionally, I have two domain nam
On a CentOS 5 server, I am having a hard time configuring BIND to
answer to 4 IP addresses for 2 domain names.
Currently, I have four IP addresses, for sake of discussion they are:
1.1.1.1
1.1.1.2
1.1.1.3
1.1.1.4
Additionally, I have two domain names. For sake of discussion:
exampleA.com
exampleB
44 matches
Mail list logo