On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I recently asked about copying a running system to a new drive.
>
> As a postscript, I'm wondering if it would have been preferable
> to run the machine under a Live OS, and simply copy the root partition
> to the new
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:22 AM, wwp wrote:
> Hello Timothy,
>
>
> I personally would not copy FROM or TO running systems. Thus,
> proceeding to the copy from a third (liveCD or not) system sounds good
> to me.
>
Agreed. It appears others have had success doing so; but, I
On Wed, 4 May 2016, Brian Miller wrote:
When copying systems I developed a preference for cpio; fewer problems
handling weird inode types.
I'm not sure I share your love of cpio for things like this.
Exactly how does cpio handle xattr/acl/selinux contexts?
jh
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 12:38 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I recently asked about copying a running system to a new drive.
>
> As a postscript, I'm wondering if it would have been preferable
> to run the machine under a Live OS, and simply copy the root partition
> to the new drive?
> Eg while
Hello Timothy,
On Wed, 04 May 2016 12:38:41 +0200 Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I recently asked about copying a running system to a new drive.
>
> As a postscript, I'm wondering if it would have been preferable
> to run the machine under a Live OS, and simply copy the root
I recently asked about copying a running system to a new drive.
As a postscript, I'm wondering if it would have been preferable
to run the machine under a Live OS, and simply copy the root partition
to the new drive?
Eg while running under the LiveOS,
# mkdir /mnt/old /mnt/new
# mount
6 matches
Mail list logo