m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:56 PM, wrote:
>>
ls -l `find /lib/modules -name nvidia.ko`
>>> How 'bout find /lib/modules -name nvidia.ko -ls?
>>> 309659070 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 Mar 18 09:48
>>> /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.2.1.el5/weak-updates/nvid
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:56 PM, wrote:
>
>>> ls -l `find /lib/modules -name nvidia.ko`
>>
>> How 'bout find /lib/modules -name nvidia.ko -ls?
>> 30965907 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 Mar 18 09:48
>> /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.2.1.el5/weak-updates/nvidia.ko ->
> It's a mess. :-
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:56 PM, wrote:
>> ls -l `find /lib/modules -name nvidia.ko`
>
> How 'bout find /lib/modules -name nvidia.ko -ls?
> 30965907 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 Mar 18 09:48
> /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.2.1.el5/weak-updates/nvidia.ko ->
> /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.
Akemi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:37 PM, wrote:
>
>>> If you do not have any other dkms-dependent packages, you should
>>> remove all dkms-xxx.
>>
>> Mmmm... I was afraid to do that, not being sure what else it loads.
>> However, if I rpm -qa | grep dkms, I only see dkms itself.
>
> In th
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:37 PM, wrote:
>> If you do not have any other dkms-dependent packages, you should
>> remove all dkms-xxx.
>
> Mmmm... I was afraid to do that, not being sure what else it loads.
> However, if I rpm -qa | grep dkms, I only see dkms itself.
In that case, you can safely
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:13 AM, wrote:
>
>>> why dkms?
>>> use nvidia-x11-drv-173xx and kmod-nvidia-173xx from elrepo, the kmod is
>>> kabi-tracking.
>>
>> That's the one I think I'm using. Somehow, when I did my most recent
>> update, to kernel 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5, or whenever it did an X up
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:13 AM, wrote:
>> why dkms?
>> use nvidia-x11-drv-173xx and kmod-nvidia-173xx from elrepo, the kmod is
>> kabi-tracking.
>
> That's the one I think I'm using. Somehow, when I did my most recent
> update, to kernel 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5, or whenever it did an X update, I
>
>
>
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Is there some way to make dkms NOT try to install/load a driver?
>>
>> mark, with an old NVidia card that is *NOT* supported
>> by anything newer than 174, and *certainly* not
>> by the "generic" xorg x11 nvidia driver
>>
>
> why dkms
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Is there some way to make dkms NOT try to install/load a driver?
>
> mark, with an old NVidia card that is *NOT* supported
> by anything newer than 174, and *certainly* not
> by the "generic" xorg x11 nvidia driver
>
why dkms?
use nvidia-
Is there some way to make dkms NOT try to install/load a driver?
mark, with an old NVidia card that is *NOT* supported
by anything newer than 174, and *certainly* not
by the "generic" xorg x11 nvidia driver
___
CentOS mailin
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of MHR
>Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 11:18 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
>
>I've never seen this problem a
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
> Diagonal thin black lines originating from upper left corner for starters.
> Then if I open a gui, whatever sort, that window gets those lines too. Menus
> are unreadable because of this, but slightly more readable if I move the
> mouse pointe
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of JohnS
>Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:52 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
>
>No none of that is hardware issue
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 10:08 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf
> >Of Michael A. Peters
> >Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:57 PM
> >To: CentOS mailing list
> &g
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Alfred von Campe
>Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 7:51 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
>
>FWIW, I don't use D
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Michael A. Peters
>Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:57 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
>
>> Strangely enough,
FWIW, I don't use DKMS but this homegrown script instead. I put
whatever version of the driver I want to deploy (currently NVIDIA-
Linux-x86-180.44-pkg1.run) in a network accessible location and
create a link named NVIDIA-Linux-x86-latest to it. The script then
handles the rest.
Alfred
Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>> Of Scott Silva
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 8:19 PM
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvid
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Akemi Yagi
>Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 8:44 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
>
>>> My question is who
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Scott Silva
>Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 8:19 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
>
>on 4-6-2009 5:55 AM Sorin
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 4-6-2009 5:55 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following:
>> My question is who updates those drivers, as the v173.08 Nvidia drivers are
>> now almost a year old? Would there be any other good repo with more current
>> drivers suitable for use with
on 4-6-2009 5:55 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following:
> I got the DKMS-system working and now have the Nvidia-drivers v173.08
> installed (using rpmforge as suggested previously). Unfortunately this
> particular driver version gives me screen artifacts so as to make the screen
> more or less unrea
I got the DKMS-system working and now have the Nvidia-drivers v173.08
installed (using rpmforge as suggested previously). Unfortunately this
particular driver version gives me screen artifacts so as to make the screen
more or less unreadable.
Nvidia's proprietary drivers are now up to v180.44 a
It was a Bounced message.
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kai Schaetzl
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 2:31 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:31:14 +0200:
> John wrote
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Ned Slider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's easy
to forget there is now a whole generation of computer users who have known
nothing but the GUI and completely missed out on DOS or CP/M, and never
owned a Spectrum/Commodore/BBC Micro etc.
Wow,
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Ned Slider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's easy
> to forget there is now a whole generation of computer users who have known
> nothing but the GUI and completely missed out on DOS or CP/M, and never
> owned a Spectrum/Commodore/BBC Micro etc.
Wow, Ned, I never t
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:31:14 +0200:
> John wrote on Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:52:03 -0400:
Hm, just to clarify, I don't know where this message came from, I wrote it
weeks ago. It must have been on hold and accidently released much too
late. Obviously, it doesn't make sense to add
Robert Becker Cope wrote:
Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CentOS is *not* for users new to Linux or Unix-like operatings
systems. It isn't. Full stop.
Hopefully what you mean is that it isn't designed specifically for users that
are new to Linux. It is a perfectly fine distribution fo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Robert Becker Cope
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 8:51 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: RE: [CentOS] DKMS
Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CentOS is *not* for users new to Linux or
Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CentOS is *not* for users new to Linux or Unix-like operatings
> systems. It isn't. Full stop.
Hopefully what you mean is that it isn't designed specifically for users that
are new to Linux. It is a perfectly fine distribution for those wanting to
learn
John wrote on Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:52:03 -0400:
> But 75% don't know how to. All they know is they downloaded the cds.
> Took them a week to figure out how to make a bootable install disk. Then
> finally 24 hours to install the OS. Six hours to get on the Internet.
> Another 5 hours to setup email.
On Saturday 05 April 2008 22:13, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Saturday 05 April 2008 20:02:08 Alan Bartlett wrote:
> > (3) The CentOS-docs list. Anne, the last item I received was dated April
> > 3rd.
>
> In the morning I'll go to the member prefs page and see if I can see what's
> wrong. Thanks
>
Noth
On Saturday 05 April 2008 20:02:08 Alan Bartlett wrote:
> (3) The CentOS-docs list. Anne, the last item I received was dated April
> 3rd.
In the morning I'll go to the member prefs page and see if I can see what's
wrong. Thanks
Anne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messag
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 15:12 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> John wrote:
> > >> One things GUIs can do is present a bunch of pre-set defaults or pick up
> >> the current settings so you only have to change a few particular items,
> >> and they can check the ranges and syntax of the entries before try
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 14:54 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Alan Bartlett wrote:
> >
> > (2) We must not loose sight of what CentOS basically is. CentOS == RHEL less
> > RH. A stable, server orientated OS. On the fora, we often see evidence that
> > CentOS is believed to be similar to *other* distros
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 14:54 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Alan Bartlett wrote:
> >
> > (2) We must not loose sight of what CentOS basically is. CentOS == RHEL less
> > RH. A stable, server orientated OS. On the fora, we often see evidence that
> > CentOS is believed to be similar to *other* distros
John wrote:
>> One things GUIs can do is present a bunch of pre-set defaults or pick up
the current settings so you only have to change a few particular items,
and they can check the ranges and syntax of the entries before trying to
apply them. Webmin does a fair job on this considering the wi
Alan Bartlett wrote:
(2) We must not loose sight of what CentOS basically is. CentOS == RHEL less
RH. A stable, server orientated OS. On the fora, we often see evidence that
CentOS is believed to be similar to *other* distros (that are more suitable
for laptops & "home" use) and that it, CentOS,
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 20:02 +0100, Alan Bartlett wrote:
> On 05/04/2008, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the command line, if you saved the commands - or got them
> from an instructional listing in the first place, you just
> paste the same set of commands into
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 13:25 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> John wrote:
> >
> >>> Idea: A separate Wiki for the new users. Don't have links on it pointing
> >>> external sites of how tos. Just have all the basic how tos; Burning the
> >>> centos cdrom in windows with a open source tool like Infra Vie
On 05/04/2008, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On the command line, if you saved the commands - or got them from an
> instructional listing in the first place, you just paste the same set of
> commands into a terminal window.
Three comments from me:
(1) Regarding what Les wrote (abov
On Saturday 05 April 2008 19:47:43 John wrote:
> > Now there's a point. I subscribed at the beginning of March and haven't
> > received anything from them since 3rd March. I'd better try to find out
> > why.
> >
> > Anne
>
> Anne you have to make an account on the Wiki then subcribe to the Docs
>
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 19:17 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Saturday 05 April 2008 18:18:47 John wrote:
> > > Ned, do I hear someone volunteering to write a new Wiki section? (I
> > > don't think a *separate* Wiki for the new users, be they M$ Windoze
> > > departees or not, is a good idea.) Perhaps
John wrote:
Idea: A separate Wiki for the new users. Don't have links on it pointing
external sites of how tos. Just have all the basic how tos; Burning the
centos cdrom in windows with a open source tool like Infra View, Nero,
or Easy CD Creator. Using the network GUI Config Tool for Dial Up A
On Saturday 05 April 2008 18:18:47 John wrote:
> > Ned, do I hear someone volunteering to write a new Wiki section? (I
> > don't think a *separate* Wiki for the new users, be they M$ Windoze
> > departees or not, is a good idea.) Perhaps this discussion should be
> > continued on the CentOS-docs li
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 12:35 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> John wrote:
> >>
> > Idea: A separate Wiki for the new users. Don't have links on it pointing
> > external sites of how tos. Just have all the basic how tos; Burning the
> > centos cdrom in windows with a open source tool like Infra View, Ne
John wrote:
The catch here is feeding the new user little by little. Ease them into
it and they will never know it
I am not saying turn CentOS into a Windows Clone. Yes, I agree educating
the user to the linux way of doing things
Some good feedback John.
I'm thinking the choice of distro i
John wrote:
Idea: A separate Wiki for the new users. Don't have links on it pointing
external sites of how tos. Just have all the basic how tos; Burning the
centos cdrom in windows with a open source tool like Infra View, Nero,
or Easy CD Creator. Using the network GUI Config Tool for Dial Up A
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 18:01 +0100, Alan Bartlett wrote:
> On 05/04/2008, Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand why you want screenshots - in the early days
> there are language
> problems :-)
>
> As Anne says, above, "A picture is worth a thousand words." I
On 05/04/2008, Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I understand why you want screenshots - in the early days there are
> language
> problems :-)
As Anne says, above, "A picture is worth a thousand words." I agree.
John wrote:
> I knew of the Dell article, as I have all of those saved for
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 17:10 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Saturday 05 April 2008 15:58, John wrote:
> > [1] I was just wondering if you knew of any that were for someone knew
> > to Linux. You know the Microsoft type tutorials that have screenshot
> > with them. That's the question I get asked a l
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 16:49 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
>
> John wrote:
> > Alan,
> > I knew of the Dell article, as I have all of those saved for reference.
> > [1] I was just wondering if you knew of any that were for someone knew
> > to Linux. You know the Microsoft type tutorials that have scree
On Saturday 05 April 2008 15:58, John wrote:
> [1] I was just wondering if you knew of any that were for someone knew
> to Linux. You know the Microsoft type tutorials that have screenshot
> with them. That's the question I get asked a lot of times from around my
> home area.
On any subject you ch
John wrote:
Alan,
I knew of the Dell article, as I have all of those saved for reference.
[1] I was just wondering if you knew of any that were for someone knew
to Linux. You know the Microsoft type tutorials that have screenshot
with them. That's the question I get asked a lot of times from a
Alan,
I knew of the Dell article, as I have all of those saved for reference.
[1] I was just wondering if you knew of any that were for someone knew
to Linux. You know the Microsoft type tutorials that have screenshot
with them. That's the question I get asked a lot of times from around my
home ar
55 matches
Mail list logo
