On 20 December 2011 14:34, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> In article <4ef0939c.9030...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com>,
> William Warren wrote:
>> On 12/20/2011 12:59 AM, Barry Brimer wrote:
>> >> 1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port set to 100 full
>> >> duplex.
>> >> 2. Many times
In article <4ef0939c.9030...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com>,
William Warren wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 12:59 AM, Barry Brimer wrote:
> >> 1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port set to 100 full
> >> duplex.
> >> 2. Many times NIC fails to come up properly during PXE boot:
> >>
> >> Any
On 12/20/2011 12:59 AM, Barry Brimer wrote:
>> 1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port set to 100 full duplex.
>> 2. Many times NIC fails to come up properly during PXE boot:
>>
>> Any other ideas?
> udev rules?
> mii-tool?
> ___
> CentOS ma
> 1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port set to 100 full duplex.
> 2. Many times NIC fails to come up properly during PXE boot:
>
> Any other ideas?
udev rules?
mii-tool?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mai
Two problems I hope to solve:
1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port set to 100 full duplex.
2. Many times NIC fails to come up properly during PXE boot:
r8169: eth0: link down
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
I can't use ethtool to disable autoneg because the nic drive
5 matches
Mail list logo