Hi;
The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does
reach their destination:
[root qmail-send]# tail current
@40004b87b3d3392cbddc new msg 97881462
@40004b87b3d3392cc5ac info msg 97881462: bytes 531 from
suzieprogram...@gmail.com qp 23629 uid 508
2010/2/26 Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.com:
Hi;
The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does
reach their destination:
[root qmail-send]# tail current
@40004b87b3d3392cbddc new msg 97881462
@40004b87b3d3392cc5ac info msg 97881462: bytes 531 from
Susan Day wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:21:01 -0400:
[root qmail-send]# tail current
Hello, I would appreciate if you could stop to send all your software
problems to this list. Most of your problems seem to be qmail-related,
please go to a qmail list for these. Thanks.
Kai
--
Get your web
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fiwrote:
2010/2/26 Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.com:
Hi;
The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does
reach their destination:
[root qmail-send]# tail current
@40004b87b3d3392cbddc
2010/2/26 Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi
wrote:
2010/2/26 Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.com:
Hi;
The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does
reach their destination:
[root
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fiwrote:
qmail is very old and not under development anymore. You should
migrate your system to postfix.
postfix isn't supported either. At least I have some experience with qmail.
Susan
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 08:57 -0400, Susan Day wrote:
snip
With respect to Kai's suggestion I find a qmail list, I'm sorry to say
there don't appear to be ANY discussion lists for ANY email servers
that are active. I'm desperate to get this working.
TIA,
Suzie
How about
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi
wrote:
qmail is very old and not under development anymore. You should
migrate your system to postfix.
postfix isn't supported either. At least I
Susan Day wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fiwrote:
2010/2/26 Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.com:
Hi;
The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does
reach their destination:
[root qmail-send]# tail current
B.J. McClure wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 08:57 -0400, Susan Day wrote:
snip
With respect to Kai's suggestion I find a qmail list, I'm sorry to say
there don't appear to be ANY discussion lists for ANY email servers
that are active. I'm desperate to get this working.
TIA,
Suzie
How
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Jeff jlar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi
wrote:
qmail is very old and not under development anymore. You should
2010/2/26 Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi
wrote:
qmail is very old and not under development anymore. You should
migrate your system to postfix.
postfix isn't supported either. At least I have some experience with
Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list
__last_week__ and __no__ responses, no activity, either. Same with
cr.yp.to's list. No. If they worked I'd be there. Here's my question again:
The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does
reach their
postfix has a very active mailing list -- the originator and primary
developer, Wietse Venema,responds to posts quite often, as well as
many other postfix experts.
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list
__last_week__ and
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
postfix has a very active mailing list -- the originator and primary
developer, Wietse Venema,responds to posts quite often, as well as
many other postfix experts.
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried
Susan Day wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:25:38 -0400:
Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list
__last_week__ and __no__ responses, no activity, either.
Maybe that's because of the nature of your questions. I get the impression
that you are mostly asking very basic
Dear Susan,
Susan Day sent a missive on 2010-02-26:
Here's my question
again:
The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never
does reach their destination:
That's not a correct statement - your email does reach google as can be seen
from your qmail log
[root
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Susan Day wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:25:38 -0400:
Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list
__last_week__ and __no__ responses, no activity, either.
Maybe that's because of the nature of your questions. I get the impression
that you are
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Susan Day wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:25:38 -0400:
Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list
__last_week__ and __no__ responses, no activity, either.
Maybe that's because of the nature of your questions. I get the
impression that you are mostly
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Simon Billis si...@houxou.com wrote:
Why?
That is a good question - I guess that google's email system thinks
you're
sending them spam. If you want your mail to be accepted you may need to
have
implemented SPF and domainkeys.
Oh, lovely. As if I didn't
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Simon Billis si...@houxou.com wrote:
Why?
That is a good question - I guess that google's email system thinks
you're
sending them spam. If you want your mail to be accepted you may
2010/2/26 Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Simon Billis si...@houxou.com wrote:
Why?
That is a good question - I guess that google's email system thinks
you're
sending them
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Susan Day
suzieprogram...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Simon Billis si...@houxou.com wrote:
Why?
That is a good question - I guess that google's email system thinks
you're sending them spam. If you want your mail to be accepted you
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:57 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Susan Day
suzieprogram...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Simon Billis si...@houxou.com wrote:
Why?
That is a good question - I guess that google's email system thinks
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:32:46PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Susan Day wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:21:01 -0400:
[root qmail-send]# tail current
Hello, I would appreciate if you could stop to send all your software
problems to this list. Most of your problems seem to be qmail-related,
On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've not done this before. Here's what I did. Please see if this
looks correct:
[root]# telnet mail.mydomain.com 25
Trying 209.216.9.56...
Connected to mail.mydomain.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:01:28 +0800:
Programmers always have a hard time picking up on the
system admin side of things.
Still they should be able to find the best avenue for their questions, or
not?
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Dominik Zyla gavro...@gavroche.pl wrote:
And please, stop send mails with html encoding.
--
Dominik Zyla
No, do not stop sending emails with HTML encoding.
Welcome to the second decade of the 21st century. We may not have flying
cars or found the
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:01:28 +0800:
Programmers always have a hard time picking up on the
system admin side of things.
Still they should be able to find the best avenue for their questions, or
not?
Fair question. But we don't have
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34:34AM -0400, Susan Day wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Simon Billis si...@houxou.com wrote:
Why?
That is a good question - I guess that google's email system thinks
you're
sending them spam. If you want your mail to be accepted you may need to
Brian Mathis wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Dominik Zyla gavro...@gavroche.pl wrote:
And please, stop send mails with html encoding.
--
Dominik Zyla
No, do not stop sending emails with HTML encoding.
Welcome to the second decade of the 21st century. We may not have flying
Mihai T. Lazarescu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34:34AM -0400, Susan Day wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Simon Billis si...@houxou.com wrote:
Why?
That is a good question - I guess that google's email system thinks
you're
sending them spam. If you want your mail to be
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Dominik Zyla gavro...@gavroche.pl
wrote:
And please, stop send mails with html encoding.
No, do not stop sending emails with HTML encoding.
Yes, *DO* stop.
Welcome to the second decade of the 21st century. We may not have flying
cars or found the
Brian Mathis wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Dominik Zyla gavro...@gavroche.pl
mailto:gavro...@gavroche.pl wrote:
And please, stop send mails with html encoding.
No, do not stop sending emails with HTML encoding.
Welcome to the second decade of the 21st century. We may not
From: Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.com
[root]# telnet mail.mydomain.com 25
Trying 209.216.9.56...
Connected to mail.mydomain.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mail.mydomain.com ESMTP
HELO mail.mydomain.com
250 mail.mydomain.com
MAIL FROM su...@mydomain.com
250 ok
RCPT TO
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:33:17 +0800:
Fair question. But we don't have to imply certain things. Some people
are just touchy not lazy. Hard to deal with the first and bring out the
cane for the second when proven.
Well, just didn't want to see another qmail
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.com wrote:
I've not done this before. Here's what I did. Please see if this looks
correct:
[root]# telnet http://mail.mydomain.commail.mydomain.com 25
Hi Sue,
From: Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.com
[root]# telnet mail.mydomain.com 25
Trying 209.216.9.56...
Connected to mail.mydomain.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mail.mydomain.com ESMTP
HELO mail.mydomain.com
250 mail.mydomain.com
MAIL FROM su...@mydomain.com
250 ok
RCPT TO
Suzie wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've not done this before. Here's what I did. Please see if this looks
correct:
snip
You didn't create a body to your email!
The
On 26/02/2010 15:32, Brian Mathis wrote:
Welcome to the second decade of the 21st century. We may not have flying
cars or found the monolith on the moon yet, but at least we can have
proportional fonts with word wrap and basic formatting like bold and
italics. If your mail reader can't
Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
On 26/02/2010 15:32, Brian Mathis wrote:
Welcome to the second decade of the 21st century. We may not have flying
cars or found the monolith on the moon yet, but at least we can have
proportional fonts with word wrap and basic formatting like bold and
On Saturday, February 27, 2010 06:46 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
On 26/02/2010 15:32, Brian Mathis wrote:
Welcome to the second decade of the 21st century. We may not have flying
cars or found the monolith on the moon yet, but at least we can have
proportional
42 matches
Mail list logo
