Apologies for the late reply; I only just saw this message today.
On 2015-08-17, Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
It shows as /dev/md/2, while it is called /dev/md2 if I boot into the OS.
It's possible that one is a symlink to the other. IIRC the /dev/md2
naming style is somewhat
There are some errors on my root filesystem, so I need to fsck it. In
order to do this while the filesystem is unmounted, I'm booting from the
install disk. However, since the filesystem is on an mdraid device, I'm
not sure of the right way to get it assembled so I can check it.
If I do,
El 09/04/13 20:41, Max Pyziur escribió:
And there is no indication how much of the process has been completed
(nothing like a %tage indicator), at least the way that I am running it.
Tip: if you have already launched fsck you can recover the progress
bar sending SIGUSR1 signal, see this
Greetings,
I'm running CentOS 5.x on one ancient but reasonably reliable machine:
root@leeloo ~ uname -a
Linux leeloo 2.6.18-308.24.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 4 17:42:30 EST 2012 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
root@leeloo ~ cat /proc/cpu
cat: /proc/cpu: No such file or directory
root@leeloo ~ cat
Max Pyziur wrote:
Greetings,
I'm running CentOS 5.x on one ancient but reasonably reliable machine:
snip
I am running some fsck's on some of the larger drives (750GB and 2TB) that
are used for backups. There is a verbosity flag (-V); but because of the
size of the drives along with slowness
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Max Pyziur wrote:
Greetings,
I'm running CentOS 5.x on one ancient but reasonably reliable machine:
snip
I am running some fsck's on some of the larger drives (750GB and 2TB) that
are used for backups. There is a verbosity flag (-V); but because
On 9/29/12, Andy Smith spoo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 September 2012 10:45, Hadi Motamedi motamed...@hotmail.com wrote:
Dear All
My server got inconsistency from sudden power cut that I fixed it with
#fsck -fvy /dev/hda at the maintenance prompt . But after reboot, one of
the installed
Dear All
My server got inconsistency from sudden power cut that I fixed it with #fsck
-fvy /dev/hda at the maintenance prompt . But after reboot, one of the
installed applications is preventing it from booting up (as can be seen in the
boot up process list). Can you please let me know how
On 29 September 2012 10:45, Hadi Motamedi motamed...@hotmail.com wrote:
Dear All
My server got inconsistency from sudden power cut that I fixed it with
#fsck -fvy /dev/hda at the maintenance prompt . But after reboot, one of
the installed applications is preventing it from booting up (as
Hi All.
I have two running servers (drbd primary, drbd secondary). When there is a
problem with one of them we switch to the second one. Currently on the
/dev/drbd0 (it has /xxx ext3 filesystem directly on it) we have some
filesystem problems (after fsck -n). I would like to correct these errors
On 04/12/2012 09:50 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
Hi All.
I have two running servers (drbd primary, drbd secondary). When there is a
problem with one of them we switch to the second one. Currently on the
/dev/drbd0 (it has /xxx ext3 filesystem directly on it) we have some
filesystem problems
--On Thursday, April 12, 2012 03:17:37 PM +0200 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
On 04/12/2012 09:50 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
I have two running servers (drbd primary, drbd secondary). When there is
a problem with one of them we switch to the second one. [...]
Is there a
On 04/12/2012 08:17 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
--On Thursday, April 12, 2012 03:17:37 PM +0200 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
On 04/12/2012 09:50 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
I have two running servers (drbd primary, drbd secondary). When there is
a problem with one of them we
--On Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:38:56 PM +0200 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
On 04/12/2012 08:17 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
However, if you're using pacemaker the RA (IIRC) has the option
of doing an 'fsck -p' before mounting. [...]
doing an 'fsck -p' before mounting
On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
returned
that we when we boot them up have some type of filesystem inconsistency that
the default preen
doesn't fix but running fsck -y does.
I want to eliminate
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
returned
that we when we boot them up have some type of filesystem inconsistency that
the
On 01/27/2012 11:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
returned
that we when we boot them up have some type of filesystem inconsistency that
the default preen
doesn't fix
On 01/27/2012 12:19 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Johnny Hughesjoh...@centos.org wrote:
On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
returned
that we when we boot them up have some
On 01/27/2012 11:19 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 01/25/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
returned
that we when we boot them up have some
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
The reason it is not the default in CentOS is because it is not the
default in RHEL.
As to why it is not the default in RHEL, I can't say for sure ... BUT
... -y (auto answer yes) is more dangerous that -p (preen). The
Hello,
We are running units in the field that are headless. Sometimes we get units
returned
that we when we boot them up have some type of filesystem inconsistency that
the default preen
doesn't fix but running fsck -y does.
I want to eliminate the -p (preen option) and always do the -y option
Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this morning,
and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots* of
files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at 70.1%, and is running at
reasonable speed.
Thanks to the folks who got this one. I *really* needed to
On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 02:01:35 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this morning,
and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots* of
files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at 70.1%, and is running at
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 02:01:35 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this
morning,
and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots*
of
files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at 70.1%, and
Hei,
Ok, as many of you pointed out, the raid arrays did not start
automatically on linux rescue boot (when not mounting the arrays).
I followed Mogens' advice: I let linux rescue mount the arrays, then
checked /etc/mtab and unmounted everything. After that fsck run ok.
(Turned out the
Are you using lvm on top of the mdraid?
If so you need to fsck the lvs not the mds.
No lvm's.
I can boot the raid system, and
cat /proc/mdstat
shows clean arrays.
The automatic fsck reported problems a while ago, and corrected them.
When I now try to run certain rsync script, I get
Jussi Hirvi schrieb:
Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck
everything. But I cannot.
The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot,
/, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5.
So I boot from CentOS 5.3 dvd in rescue mode, do not mount
On 07/22/2010 10:38 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
...
I still don't know why fsck from the rescue dvd does not work.
You could try to let the rescue dvd mount the partitions.
Then you can umount them and fsck.
I don't think that the rescue disk assembles the RAID partitions
unless they are going to
Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck
everything. But I cannot.
The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot,
/, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5.
So I boot from CentOS 5.3 dvd in rescue mode, do not mount the file
systems, and try to
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Jussi Hirvi listmem...@greenspot.fi wrote:
Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck
everything. But I cannot.
The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot,
/, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5.
So I boot
On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Jussi Hirvi listmem...@greenspot.fi wrote:
Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck
everything. But I cannot.
The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot,
/, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5.
So I
On 07/21/2010 09:12 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
So I boot from CentOS 5.3 dvd in rescue mode, do not mount the file
systems, and try to run
fsck -y /dev/md0
fsck -y /dev/md1
fsck -y /dev/md2
For each try I get an error message: Superblock could not be found...
The device does
Thanks for all replies .
Today, I did the following things,and also met the other errror message:
First, I used the CentOS 4.6 DVD to boot for the linux rescue and then i
copy all data to the another server
Then, reboot the server and then boot it from the hard disk.
This time, the screen
sync wrote:
Thanks for all replies .
Today, I did the following things,and also met the other errror message:
First, I used the CentOS 4.6 DVD to boot for the linux rescue and then
i copy all data to the another server
Then, reboot the server and then boot it from the hard disk.
sync wrote:
Thanks for all replies .
Today, I did the following things,and also met the other errror message:
snip
Then, reboot the server and then boot it from the hard disk.
This time, the screen came up with these:
Checking root filesystem:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote, On 03/23/2010 09:49 AM:
sync wrote:
Thanks for all replies .
Today, I did the following things,and also met the other errror message:
snip
Then, reboot the server and then boot it from the hard disk.
This time, the screen came up with these:
Checking root
hi , guys:
when i reboot the server today ,the screen displays this ;
---
Setting hostname xxx [OK]
Your system appears to have shut down uncleanly
Press Y within 1 seconds to force file system integrity
2010/3/22 sync jian...@gmail.com:
hi , guys:
when i reboot the server today ,the screen displays this ;
---
Setting hostname xxx [OK]
Your system appears to have shut down uncleanly
Press Y within 1
Not yet ~
i searched it via Google and found this website :
http://www.experts-exchange.com/OS/Linux/Distributions/Red_Hat/Q_25043629.html
i do that said but this time screen displayed this :
/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 : faild
Inodes that were part of a corrupted or phan linked list found .
sync wrote:
run fsck manually without a or p options?
Not yet ~
why not?
i searched it via Google and found this website :
http://www.experts-exchange.com/OS/Linux/Distributions/Red_Hat/Q_25043629.html
i do that said but this time screen displayed this :
try reading the bottom of
Thanks for all reply...
Because the boss don't let me do that .
He said that would be dangerous and it would destroy all data in the hard
disk
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr wrote:
sync wrote:
run fsck manually without a or p
sync wrote, On 03/22/2010 05:11 AM:
Thanks for all reply...
A) as Nicolas HINTED please read the _text_ that follows Guidelines for CentOS
Mailing List posts at
http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16
B) as time permits read the links in that section, I think the ones
2010/3/22 sync jian...@gmail.com:
Thanks for all reply...
Because the boss don't let me do that .
He said that would be dangerous and it would destroy all data in the hard
disk
Well, then restore files from backups.
--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing
Well , Thanks for your suggestions.
1.Which kind of file system is being used on the volume having trouble?
A: it uses the ext2fs filesystem on CentOS 4.6 x86_64
2.Do you have backups?
A: that server is used to backup other servers data , so itself has not any
backups
3.Is the volume small
sync wrote:
Well , Thanks for your suggestions.
1.Which kind of file system is being used on the volume having trouble?
A: it uses the ext2fs filesystem on CentOS 4.6 x86_64
2.Do you have backups?
A: that server is used to backup other servers data , so itself has not
any backups
On 03/22/2010 08:33 PM, sync wrote:
Well , Thanks for your suggestions.
1.Which kind of file system is being used on the volume having trouble?
A: it uses the ext2fs filesystem on CentOS 4.6 x86_64
2.Do you have backups?
A: that server is used to backup other servers data , so itself
Hi,
Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode.
All suggestions are welcomed.
--
Thanks
http://www.911networks.com
When the network has to
mmm why you not reboot?
you can set the service you wan in init 1 and go it
2009/5/16 cen...@911networks.com
Hi,
Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
I can't shutdown the system and reboot in
cen...@911networks.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode.
All suggestions are welcomed.
You can run fsck with the
cen...@911networks.com wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 21:18:17 +0200
Equinox86 equino...@gmail.com wrote:
mmm why you not reboot?
Because to reboot, I will need the authorization of 3 different
people. Don't ask, they are having major political fights between
2 divisions.
You really need to
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 11:51 -0700, cen...@911networks.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode.
All suggestions are
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:51 PM, cen...@911networks.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode.
All suggestions are
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
cen...@911networks.com wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 21:18:17 +0200
Equinox86 equino...@gmail.com wrote:
mmm why you not reboot?
Because to reboot, I will need the authorization of 3 different
people. Don't ask, they
On 5/16/09, cen...@911networks.com cen...@911networks.com wrote:
Is there a way to run fsck or any other program to check if there is
drive problem. I don't want it repaired, now, but maybe later on.
I can't shutdown the system and reboot in single user-mode.
All suggestions are welcomed.
Hello
our server is crashed and now some files are missing.
when I do ls, I can see the file but when I do ls -la, file does not
show up.
I am going to do fsck, but was wondering if there is any other quick fix
rather
than umount and do fsck.
Thanks
Centos wrote:
Hello
our server is crashed and now some files are missing.
when I do ls, I can see the file but when I do ls -la, file does not
show up.
I am going to do fsck, but was wondering if there is any
other quick fix
rather
than umount and do fsck.
Fsck is a necessary
I thought we have 2 Tera Byte limitation on RAID 5.
were you be able to make RAID more than 2 Tera Byte ?
Dan Halbert wrote:
Dan Dansereau wrote:
Hello
I have a newbie question, given a centos 5 installation,
An 5 very large disk arrays ( 2.5Tbytes each ) -
Is there a way to suspend or stop
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 06:33 -0300, centos wrote:
I thought we have 2 Tera Byte limitation on RAID 5.
were you be able to make RAID more than 2 Tera Byte ?
AFAIK, the limit is on the size of the LUN, not RAID 5 in general.
-Steve
___
CentOS mailing
On Friday 10 August 2007, centos wrote:
I thought we have 2 Tera Byte limitation on RAID 5.
were you be able to make RAID more than 2 Tera Byte ?
Hardware raid5 is limited by the driver you use and the controller. Software
raid5 is not limited to 2 TiB.
On top of that you have to sort out the
Dan Dansereau wrote:
Hello
I have a newbie question, given a centos 5 installation,
An 5 very large disk arrays ( 2.5Tbytes each ) -
Is there a way to suspend or stop the fsck during the boot up?
To stop it in the future:
# tune2fs -c 0 -i 0 /dev/sda1 # or whatever device
See the
Dan Dansereau wrote:
Hello
I have a newbie question, given a centos 5 installation,
An 5 very large disk arrays ( 2.5Tbytes each ) -
Is there a way to suspend or stop the fsck during the boot up?
The system seems to pick the most inopportune time to decide to reach
the check count
61 matches
Mail list logo
