Re: [CentOS] Floating VIP...

2012-05-14 Thread John Doe
From: Tait Clarridge > Also, use IPaddr2 as the resource type as it will do an gratuitous arp, > significantly decreasing the failover time. From: Dennis Jacobfeuerborn > Hearbeat isn't developed anymore so if you want to go the pacemaker route > you probably want to go for corosync+pacemaker i

Re: [CentOS] Floating VIP...

2012-05-11 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 05/11/2012 02:40 PM, John Doe wrote: > Hi, > > right now I am using only one external server as a gateway for the internal > servers. > I would like to enable a fail-over on a second server. > To implement the floating VIP, should I use heartbeat+pacemaker? > Or is there something more "lightw

Re: [CentOS] Floating VIP...

2012-05-11 Thread Tait Clarridge
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 05:40 -0700, John Doe wrote: > Hi, > > right now I am using only one external server as a gateway for the internal > servers. > I would like to enable a fail-over on a second server. > To implement the floating VIP, should I use heartbeat+pacemaker? > Or is there something

[CentOS] Floating VIP...

2012-05-11 Thread John Doe
Hi, right now I am using only one external server as a gateway for the internal servers. I would like to enable a fail-over on a second server. To implement the floating VIP, should I use heartbeat+pacemaker? Or is there something more "lightweight"? Basically, I just need server2 up the VIP when