Le 28/11/2011 20:49, Lamar Owen a écrit :
> On Monday, November 28, 2011 01:15:30 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
>> None of which justifies someone else helping to continue a misguided
>> and insecure practice...
>
> Not all systems are Internet connected, and not all sites need the same
> security; one s
Le 28/11/2011 17:23, Les Mikesell a écrit :
(...)
> This is a little bit different from normal mounting - that is a
> feature built into the Nautilus file manager. It will be able to
> copy/paste/edit//execute files from the remote share as internal
> operations and but it doesn't make them ava
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 06:11:31 AM Guitart Francesc wrote:
>> How I can force always the request of login and password?
>
> In System -> Administration -> Authentication, 'Options' tab, is 'Cache User
> Information' checked?
I think C
On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 06:11:31 AM Guitart Francesc wrote:
> How I can force always the request of login and password?
In System -> Administration -> Authentication, 'Options' tab, is 'Cache User
Information' checked?
___
CentOS mailing list
C
On Monday, November 28, 2011 01:15:30 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> None of which justifies someone else helping to continue a misguided
> and insecure practice...
Not all systems are Internet connected, and not all sites need the same
security; one size does not fit all.
In the OP, we have a basic
On 11/28/11 5:51 AM, Guitart Francesc wrote:
>> are you using smb mounts, or just smbclient with 'get/put' ftp-style
>> > file access?
> I don't know, how I can check it? What are using when you connect by
> "Connect to server">> "Shared Windows" ?
no idea, I hardly ever use gnome.
--
john r
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> On Monday, November 28, 2011 12:40:59 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> You missed one: he may not have the authority to do so.
>>
>> Yep, I did. I keep forgetting that others don't have the flexibility
>> that I do, so tha
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Monday, November 28, 2011 12:40:59 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> You missed one: he may not have the authority to do so.
>
> Yep, I did. I keep forgetting that others don't have the flexibility that I
> do, so thanks for that reminder.
>
On Monday, November 28, 2011 12:40:59 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> You missed one: he may not have the authority to do so.
Yep, I did. I keep forgetting that others don't have the flexibility that I
do, so thanks for that reminder.
___
CentOS mailing l
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Monday, November 28, 2011 11:23:57 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Even if all the users are working at the same
>> console, they should have different logins.
>
> You know, reading through this thread is frustrating.
Yup.
>
> Frustrating in that the OP's question has yet to be an
On Monday, November 28, 2011 11:23:57 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
> Even if all the users are working at the same
> console, they should have different logins.
You know, reading through this thread is frustrating.
Frustrating in that the OP's question has yet to be answered; instead, yet
again, the O
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Logging out of the Gnome desktop should do it, but the whole concept
> seems very wrong. Even if all the users are working at the same
> console, they should have different logins.
+1
If you don't have separate logins, or delete and fully recreate the
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Guitart Francesc
wrote:
>
>> So what happened when all the users log in at once to the shared
>> account? I'd expect the mounted NAS to be available to everyone
>> regardless of who mounted it first. And if that's the case, why does
>> it matter if that continue
Le 28/11/2011 14:56, Les Mikesell a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Guitart Francesc
> wrote:
>>
>>> 1. Why use shared account?
>>
>> Good question. This is a server that was already running when I started
>> working here. I don't know the software that has installed and prefer
>> not
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Guitart Francesc
wrote:
>
>> 1. Why use shared account?
>
> Good question. This is a server that was already running when I started
> working here. I don't know the software that has installed and prefer
> not to touch a lot. That's the only reason I have for to co
Le 28/11/2011 09:36, John R Pierce a écrit :
> On 11/28/11 12:22 AM, Guitart Francesc wrote:
>> Sorry, maybe I haven't been clear. What I can do with Debian is to
>> forget the SMB password every time I get connect to NAS, in such a way
>> several network users can use the same local account. While
Le 28/11/2011 09:27, Fajar Priyanto a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Guitart Francesc
> wrote:
>>> if all the user processes are running as the same user ID, how do you
>>> expect the file system to know what user is supposed to have access to
>>> which share? what you're asking for
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011, Guitart Francesc wrote:
El vie, 25-11-2011 a las 11:03 +, John Hodrien escribió:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, Guitart Francesc wrote:
> Thanks for your comment. You're right, but the problem arises with your
> solution is that all users are using the CentOS machine login local
On 11/28/11 12:22 AM, Guitart Francesc wrote:
> Sorry, maybe I haven't been clear. What I can do with Debian is to
> forget the SMB password every time I get connect to NAS, in such a way
> several network users can use the same local account. While, if I
> understand correctly, you are talking on
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Guitart Francesc
wrote:
>> if all the user processes are running as the same user ID, how do you
>> expect the file system to know what user is supposed to have access to
>> which share? what you're asking for is physically impossible. once
>> user "A" logged o
Le 26/11/2011 20:01, John R Pierce a écrit :
> On 11/26/11 2:42 AM, Guitart Francesc wrote:
>> I'm talking of one local account in the CentOS machine without
>> permissions to the network (this is why i'm trying to give them acces to
>> the NAS as your own network user account) where the users run
On 11/26/11 2:42 AM, Guitart Francesc wrote:
> I'm talking of one local account in the CentOS machine without
> permissions to the network (this is why i'm trying to give them acces to
> the NAS as your own network user account) where the users run a
> calculation system.
if all the user processes
El vie, 25-11-2011 a las 19:11 +0800, Fajar Priyanto escribió:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Guitart Francesc
> wrote:
> > In fact I have explained wrong. This time I log in from any window File
> > >> Go to .. (I don't know the exact translation in english cause I'm in
> > one french comput
El vie, 25-11-2011 a las 11:03 +, John Hodrien escribió:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, Guitart Francesc wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your comment. You're right, but the problem arises with your
> > solution is that all users are using the CentOS machine login locally
> > with the same user. So, correct me
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Guitart Francesc
wrote:
> In fact I have explained wrong. This time I log in from any window File
> >> Go to .. (I don't know the exact translation in english cause I'm in
> one french computer) and type smb://nas_name.
>
> I can access to the NAS and I can enter
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, Guitart Francesc wrote:
> Thanks for your comment. You're right, but the problem arises with your
> solution is that all users are using the CentOS machine login locally
> with the same user. So, correct me if I'm wrong, I think I can not mount
> the volume for each user witho
El mié, 23-11-2011 a las 10:50 -0800, John R Pierce escribió:
> On 11/23/11 3:11 AM, Guitart Francesc wrote:
> > here I connect through SMB port 445
>
> why in dogs name are you using SMB, a Microsoft Windows protocol, for
> Unix to NAS file sharing? Unix systems should use NFS for file
> shar
El jue, 24-11-2011 a las 07:00 -0500, Eric Coleman escribió:
> Dear Guitart,
>
> You have Microsoft Windows on your mind . . . Microsoft has left the
> building!
Maybe you are right but I'm not asking nothing that I can't do with
Debian, so I supose that there are one way of do it with CentOS.
Dear Guitart,
You have Microsoft Windows on your mind . . . Microsoft has left the building!
- Original Message -
From: Guitart Francesc
Sent: 11/23/11 05:11 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Forget SMB password immediately
Hi, I'm new to CentOS and also on the list, si
On 11/23/11 3:11 AM, Guitart Francesc wrote:
> here I connect through SMB port 445
why in dogs name are you using SMB, a Microsoft Windows protocol, for
Unix to NAS file sharing? Unix systems should use NFS for file
sharing. netbios is a tangled mess of poorly planned protocols with
extensi
Le 23/11/2011 12:11, Guitart Francesc a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to CentOS and also on the list, since I usually work with Debian. My
> problem is as follows:
>
> I have a NAS where users connect to do their backups. Each user has a folder
> shared where only he can enter. Multiple users get con
Hi,
I'm new to CentOS and also on the list, since I usually work with Debian. My
problem is as follows:
I have a NAS where users connect to do their backups. Each user has a folder
shared where only he can enter. Multiple users get connected from a CentOS 5.7
to the NAS, each in its shared fol
32 matches
Mail list logo
