May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/
Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because
their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :)
Cheers,
Timo
+1 Just Awesome.ROFL.too funny :)
Thanks for the link
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Timo Schoeler
timo.schoe...@riscworks.netwrote:
May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/
Windows admins use a
thus Tom Bishop spake:
+1 Just Awesome.ROFL.too funny :)
Thanks for the link
Maybe stuff for then next newsletter...?
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Timo Schoeler
timo.schoe...@riscworks.netwrote:
May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh:
* Timo Schoeler (timo.schoe...@riscworks.net) wrote:
May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/
Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because
their own tools are not able to handle copying
, with a post-it
note sayin - This is why I use linux :)
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Timo Schoeler
Sent: 24 September 2010 14:23
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] In the press, once again
May be a little bit off topic
On 24 September 2010 14:23, Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote:
Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because
their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :)
Although I read the article with some amusement, I have to wonder
what's
On 9/24/2010 10:37 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
On 24 September 2010 14:23, Timo Schoelertimo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote:
Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because
their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :)
Although I read the article
May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/
VERY nice! Thank you for the link!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 09/24/2010 08:37 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
On 24 September 2010 14:23, Timo Schoelertimo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote:
Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because
their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :)
Although I
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 09:54 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 09/24/2010 08:37 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
On 24 September 2010 14:23, Timo Schoelertimo.schoe...@riscworks.net
wrote:
Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because
their own tools are not able to handle
Until Cygwin's developers decide the join the rest of the window's
universe in having an *uninstaller* it will remain not installed -
ever on many people's systems, including mine.
IMO, a windows system with Cygwin and Cygwin tools isn't
really a Windows system anymore; it is an
It was funny, but it would have been more efficient to use tar over netcat
instead of CP or rsync to initially populate the directory. It would be a
steady data stream to the network and wouldn't beat up on the file system as
bad as rsync would.
Good read none the less. :)
- Original
On 9/24/2010 11:54 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On 24 September 2010 14:23, Timo Schoelertimo.schoe...@riscworks.net
wrote:
Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because
their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :)
Although I read
On 9/24/2010 12:08 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
It was funny, but it would have been more efficient to use tar over netcat
instead of CP or rsync to initially populate the directory. It would be a
steady data stream to the network and wouldn't beat up on the file system as
bad as rsync
- Original Message -
| On 9/24/2010 12:08 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
| It was funny, but it would have been more efficient to use tar over
| netcat instead of CP or rsync to initially populate the directory.
| It would be a steady data stream to the network and wouldn't beat up
| on
On 24 September 2010 18:04, Brunner, Brian T. bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
No Windows functionalities are lost by installing Cygwin.
Cygwin has the SAME uninstall that Windows does: install CentOS.
cwrsync comes with an uninstallable package and works OK, makes
copying loads of files across
On 9/24/2010 10:54 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
Until Cygwin's developers decide the join the rest of the window's
universe in having an *uninstaller* it will remain not installed -
ever on many people's systems, including mine. It is completely
unacceptable that it is happy to install, but that
On 24/9/10 2:16 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote:
On 9/24/2010 10:54 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
Until Cygwin's developers decide the join the rest of the window's
universe in having an *uninstaller* it will remain not installed -
ever on many people's systems, including mine. It is
18 matches
Mail list logo
