On 1/4/21 3:05 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
I would expect broken update paths. Also after EOL of CentOS Linux but
not sure if they plan a new "playground" repo:
EPEL-NEXT ... see here:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 at 23:05, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 1/3/21 8:34 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 at 18:20, Gordon Messmer
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 1/3/21 2:51 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>> is it still OK to set up EPEL as a repo?
> >>
> >>
> >> Yes. CentOS Stream is
Am 03.01.21 um 23:51 schrieb Kay Schenk:
Hello all--
All good in the Stream for me. :)
Because Stream will tend to be more "forward moving" than previous
CentOS releases, is it still OK to set up EPEL as a repo? So far, I've
only installed terminus fonts from CentOS 8 EPEL, but I'm just
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 6:44 AM Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 1/3/21 8:05 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> > So how would one use this shiny bit of information? Is there a way to
> > discover if an EPEL application is going to clobber your system before
> > you install it?
> As long as the upstream
On 1/3/21 8:05 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
So how would one use this shiny bit of information? Is there a way to
discover if an EPEL application is going to clobber your system before
you install it?
As long as the upstream developers observe semantic versioning, dnf
would tell whether or
On 1/3/21 5:34 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Except in cases where packages in a RHEL point release are being rebased.
This is something which is happening with a lot more gusto than in any
previous releases so there may be points where say a QT or a
gnomelib provides in Stream is ahead of
On 1/3/21 8:34 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 at 18:20, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
On 1/3/21 2:51 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
is it still OK to set up EPEL as a repo?
Yes. CentOS Stream is expected to be backward-compatible with RHEL, for
the same reason that each RHEL point
On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 at 18:20, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 1/3/21 2:51 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > is it still OK to set up EPEL as a repo?
>
>
> Yes. CentOS Stream is expected to be backward-compatible with RHEL, for
> the same reason that each RHEL point release is backward-compatible with
>
On 1/3/21 2:51 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
is it still OK to set up EPEL as a repo?
Yes. CentOS Stream is expected to be backward-compatible with RHEL, for
the same reason that each RHEL point release is backward-compatible with
previous point releases.
Hello all--
All good in the Stream for me. :)
Because Stream will tend to be more "forward moving" than previous
CentOS releases, is it still OK to set up EPEL as a repo? So far, I've
only installed terminus fonts from CentOS 8 EPEL, but I'm just wondering
about this. Generally, are there
10 matches
Mail list logo
