On 19/01/11 12:41, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:29:12AM -0800, S Mathias wrote:
[...snip...]
>
>> 4) If it's so great why isn't it more prevalent?
>
> It's not yet a 1.0 release; this may have something to do with
> it.
The version number doesn't need to say any
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:12 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>
> I have after you pointed out he's a leech (my wording, not
> yours) above and I was reminded of his past antics here. Again
> my apologies to you and the list for mentally blocking him out
> and not putting 2
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:36:53PM -0800, Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:42 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:33:59AM -0800, Mark wrote:
> >> Let's talk about CentOS on this list, shall we?
> >
> > Presumably the OP is running firefox on CentOS. So... how
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:38:36PM -0800, Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:35 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> >
> > The OP asked a pretty straight-forward set of questions. Was it
> > 100% germane to this list? No, perhaps not.
>
> The problem is that none of his questions i
On Jan 19, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Mark wrote:
> This is a fellow who routinely asks extremely general questions that
> so strongly resemble first-year student homework questions that I, and
> others, have taken the path of not helping him. I'm not here to do
> anyone's homework for them.
You can gene
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:35 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>>
>> The OP asked a pretty straight-forward set of questions. Was it
>> 100% germane to this list? No, perhaps not.
>
> The problem is that none of his questions is ever 100% g
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:35 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>
> The OP asked a pretty straight-forward set of questions. Was it
> 100% germane to this list? No, perhaps not.
The problem is that none of his questions is ever 100% germane to the
various lists to which he posts.
More l
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:42 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:33:59AM -0800, Mark wrote:
>> Let's talk about CentOS on this list, shall we?
>
> Presumably the OP is running firefox on CentOS. So... how it this
> not about CentOS?
>
If that's true, why does
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:40:40PM +, Ned Slider wrote:
>
> You are kidding, right?
No.
> I do my accounts on CentOS - does that make this a suitable venue to
> discuss my tax returns?
Please conflate more.
> The SNR of this list is shocking and encouraging the above doesn
On 19/01/11 18:42, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:33:59AM -0800, Mark wrote:
>> Let's talk about CentOS on this list, shall we?
>
> Presumably the OP is running firefox on CentOS. So... how it this
> not about CentOS?
>
>
You are kidding, right?
I do my accounts
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:33:59AM -0800, Mark wrote:
> Let's talk about CentOS on this list, shall we?
Presumably the OP is running firefox on CentOS. So... how it this
not about CentOS?
John
--
A man or woman is seld
Let's talk about CentOS on this list, shall we?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: S Mathias
> Ok. It's a Firefox Add-on:
> https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
> Questions:
> 1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
>https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
maybe because they did not choose to put it there...?
maybe they have more trust in th
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:33:56PM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
> Maybe cause it's not part of CentOS, or even Linux? Just a guess?
What has that to do with the OP's questions? No firefox add-on
fits that criteria but yet I suspect everyone is using one or
more.
On 01/19/2011 03:29 AM, S Mathias wrote:
> Ok. It's a Firefox Add-on:
>
> https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
>
> Questions:
>
> 1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere/faq/
> 2) Did anyon
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:29:12AM -0800, S Mathias wrote:
>
> 1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere/faq/ answers this.
> 2) Did anyone audited the "HTTPS Everywhere" code?
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 03:29 -0800, S Mathias wrote:
> Ok. It's a Firefox Add-on:
> https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
> Questions:
> 1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
No clue.
> 2) Did anyone audited the "HTTPS Everyw
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:29 PM, S Mathias wrote:
> Ok. It's a Firefox Add-on:
>
> https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
>
> Questions:
>
> 1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
>
> 2) Did anyone audited the "HTTPS Everywhere"
Ok. It's a Firefox Add-on:
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
Questions:
1) But: Why can't i find it on the offical Firefox Add-ons site?:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
2) Did anyone audited the "HTTPS Everywhere" code?
3) Can someone trust this Add-on? Is it safe to install/use
19 matches
Mail list logo
