> On 16/07/21 10:39 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
>>> And I ask again, how else would you expect the package to satisfy the
>>> dependency in chrome for the newer libstdc++?
>
> And yet you still have not answered this question.
Simple answer: you can NOT without breaking RPMs dependency system.
>
>>
On 16/07/21 10:39 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
And I ask again, how else would you expect the package to satisfy the
dependency in chrome for the newer libstdc++?
And yet you still have not answered this question.
And that's where it breaks the rules! It "provides" something that it
doesn't
On 16.07.21 13:28, Simon Matter wrote:
On 16.07.21 12:39, Simon Matter wrote:
On 16/07/21 10:19 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
I think you missed from a different post where the package was
created
by a different 3rd-party, not google. So how else would you expect
the
3rd-party package to satisfy
> On 16.07.21 12:39, Simon Matter wrote:
>>> On 16/07/21 10:19 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
> I think you missed from a different post where the package was
> created
> by a different 3rd-party, not google. So how else would you expect
> the
> 3rd-party package to satisfy the
On 16.07.21 12:39, Simon Matter wrote:
On 16/07/21 10:19 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
I think you missed from a different post where the package was created
by a different 3rd-party, not google. So how else would you expect the
3rd-party package to satisfy the dependency?
I didn't say the chrome
> On 16/07/21 10:19 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
>>> I think you missed from a different post where the package was created
>>> by a different 3rd-party, not google. So how else would you expect the
>>> 3rd-party package to satisfy the dependency?
>>
>> I didn't say the chrome packages came from
On 16/07/21 10:19 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
I think you missed from a different post where the package was created
by a different 3rd-party, not google. So how else would you expect the
3rd-party package to satisfy the dependency?
I didn't say the chrome packages came from google. But, the TO
> On 16/07/21 8:41 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
>>> No, it looks for several different "libstdc++.so.6" versions, and the
>>> "chrome" package provides them all. I just listed one of them to
>>> illustrate the point.
>>
>> I'm not sure that's true. You said your chrome package provides it all
>> but
>>
On 16/07/21 8:41 pm, Simon Matter wrote:
No, it looks for several different "libstdc++.so.6" versions, and the
"chrome" package provides them all. I just listed one of them to
illustrate the point.
I'm not sure that's true. You said your chrome package provides it all but
from what I see, it
> On 15/07/2021 12:57, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 05:30, Toralf Lund wrote:
>>> On 15/07/2021 09:37, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:03 PM Toralf Lund
wrote:
> Does anyone else run Microsoft Teams on CentOS 7?
>
> I've used
On 15/07/2021 12:57, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 05:30, Toralf Lund wrote:
On 15/07/2021 09:37, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:03 PM Toralf Lund wrote:
Does anyone else run Microsoft Teams on CentOS 7?
I've used it for a while now, and it's
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:03 PM Toralf Lund wrote:
> Does anyone else run Microsoft Teams on CentOS 7?
>
> I've used it for a while now, and it's generally worked reasonably well.
> However, after upgrading to the latest version from the Microsoft repos,
> it doesn't start up properly. Processes
Le 13/07/2021 à 14:02, Toralf Lund a écrit :
> Does anyone else run Microsoft Teams on CentOS 7?
>
> I've used it for a while now, and it's generally worked reasonably well.
> However, after upgrading to the latest version from the Microsoft repos, it
> doesn't start up properly. Processes start
hi
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 01:23:58PM +0100, Phil Perry wrote:
> On 13/07/2021 13:02, Toralf Lund wrote:
> >Does anyone else run Microsoft Teams on CentOS 7?
> >
<...>
> >
> >The release that doesn't work is 1.4.00.13653. The one that does
> >is 1.4.00.7556.
> >
> >- Toralf
> >
>
> My wife has
On 13/07/2021 13:02, Toralf Lund wrote:
Does anyone else run Microsoft Teams on CentOS 7?
I've used it for a while now, and it's generally worked reasonably well.
However, after upgrading to the latest version from the Microsoft repos,
it doesn't start up properly. Processes start and remain
Does anyone else run Microsoft Teams on CentOS 7?
I've used it for a while now, and it's generally worked reasonably well.
However, after upgrading to the latest version from the Microsoft repos,
it doesn't start up properly. Processes start and remain active until I
give up and kill them,
16 matches
Mail list logo
