-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Hass
Sent: den 29 januari 2014 08:47
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Hi friend -
what is your end goal with this effort to obtain security
On 1/28/2014 4:45 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Use IPA. It combines LDAP with Kerberos, a server-client environment is
easily setup and the documentation (RHEL deployment) is very helpful.
Thank you. I'll look it up.
LDAP and Kerberos though. That does sound a lot like Microsoft Active
did my community service for the day.
Wizard of Hass!
On 1/29/2014 12:11 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Hass
Sent: den 29 januari 2014 08:47
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS
On 01/29/2014 09:44 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 1/28/2014 4:45 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Use IPA. It combines LDAP with Kerberos, a server-client environment is
easily setup and the documentation (RHEL deployment) is very helpful.
Thank you. I'll look it up.
LDAP and Kerberos though. That does
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Hass
Sent: den 29 januari 2014 09:49
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Good call - not sure how far your coding goes and with what/how
languages
09:49
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Good call - not sure how far your coding goes and with what/how
languages and scripts...
Make sure to have as much as possible on VM's related to your security
'servers' -- so that you also get a virtual built in Disaster
experience.
Most.
~ later.
j/h
On 1/29/2014 1:49 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Hass
Sent: den 29 januari 2014 09:49
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Good
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Hass
Sent: den 29 januari 2014 11:11
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Almost forgot, //Sorin:
SSL uses public key cryptography:
1. You (or your
--On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 12:45:09 PM + Sorin Srbu
sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
LDAP and Kerberos though. That does sound a lot like Microsoft Active
Directory. 8-)
No, the other way around. Microsoft Active Directory sounds a lot
like LDAP and Kerberos. Credit where credit is
No, the other way around. Microsoft Active Directory sounds a lot
like LDAP and Kerberos. Credit where credit is due ...
No, the other way around. Microsoft Active Directory implements an
LDAP like directory accessible interface for its own directory.
Calling Active Directory LDAP is like
brilliant.
exactly.
On 1/29/2014 2:24 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
No, the other way around. Microsoft Active Directory sounds a lot
like LDAP and Kerberos. Credit where credit is due ...
No, the other way around. Microsoft Active Directory implements an
LDAP like directory accessible
On 1/29/2014 2:24 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
No, the other way around. Microsoft Active Directory implements an
LDAP like directory accessible interface for its own directory.
Calling Active Directory LDAP is like calling vim `echo xx yy`. If you
are unaware of all the moving parts under
AD *is* a modified/extended LDAP+Kerberos based system, it just adds a
ton more proprietary stuff around it to manage Windows workstations, the
whole Group Policy Object stuff etc etc. Thats all implemented via
LDAP extensions.
I'm sorry, with all due respect I disagree. There is an
On 1/29/2014 3:17 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I'm sorry, with all due respect I disagree. There is an unfathomable quantity
of
functionality not accessible via LDAP.
You can query some aspects made available through the LDAP interface, you
cannot set nor modify plenty.
indeed, as I said,
Pretty much rightand is not truly X.500 compliant...This AD.
It makes me nervous when one refers to it as LDAP...heh.
Do a low level trace when running: ldapsearch ..
Problem is AD has to be dealt with until Microsoft dies! Becomes Novell.
And it will someday
Anyway The LDAP with
Hi all,
We're getting to a point in our linux environment where it's starting to be
cumbersome to keep shadow and passwd-files up-to-date for the users to login
on each computer. Scripts can only get us so far. 8-/
I've looked a bit into central login systems for linux, and NIS and LDAP seem
Hi Sorin
we use here LDAP authentication and mail-control since more than 10 years.
At that time, we did the conversion from passwd/shadow to LDAP using the
tools on
http://www.padl.com/download/
which are still available, probably in a newer version...
To represent a person or a service in
2014-01-28 Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
Hi all,
We're getting to a point in our linux environment where it's starting to be
cumbersome to keep shadow and passwd-files up-to-date for the users to
login
on each computer. Scripts can only get us so far. 8-/
I've looked a bit into
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of anax
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 12:24
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Hi Sorin
we use here LDAP authentication and mail-control since more than 10 years
the mail.
suomi
On 2014-01-28 13:32, Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of anax
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 12:24
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Hi Sorin
we use here LDAP
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Darod Zyree
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 13:00
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Use IPA. It combines LDAP with Kerberos, a server-client environment is
easily
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of anax
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 13:45
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Hi Sorin
of course: you may omit the mail cocacho and realize only the
authentication
On 01/28/2014 04:02 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Hi all,
We're getting to a point in our linux environment where it's starting to be
cumbersome to keep shadow and passwd-files up-to-date for the users to login
on each computer. Scripts can only get us so far. 8-/
I've looked a bit into central
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Pete Geenhuizen
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 14:12
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
I used NIS for many years while working on Sun Solaris and it worked
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Sorin Srbu
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 4:03 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Hi all,
We're getting to a point in our linux environment where it's starting to be
cumbersome to keep shadow and passwd-files up-to-date
, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Pete Geenhuizen
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 14:12
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
I used NIS for many years
Security is a major consideration, and even though as you say most of
the traffic is local, most problems are internal as opposed to external.
Pete
On 01/28/2014 08:22 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Yeah, that last bit made me squirm over here. I don't feel good about that,
even though the linux
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Kaplan, Andrew H.
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 14:31
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
We have been using NIS for over a decade on our network, and it has been
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Logan McNaughton
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 14:33
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Where I work we use NIS + Kerberos (Active Directory). We have about 150
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Logan McNaughton
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 14:33
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
The only thing I'm trying to accomplish is a system which will allow me to
keep user accounts and passwords in one place, with one place only to
administrate. NIS seems to be able to do that.
Comments and insights are
Matt Garman matthew.gar...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
The only thing I'm trying to accomplish is a system which will allow me to
keep user accounts and passwords in one place, with one place only to
administrate. NIS seems
2014-01-28 Laurent Wandrebeck l.wandreb...@quelquesmots.fr
Matt Garman matthew.gar...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
wrote:
The only thing I'm trying to accomplish is a system which will allow me
to
keep user accounts and
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Darod Zyree darodzy...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-01-28 Laurent Wandrebeck l.wandreb...@quelquesmots.fr
Matt Garman matthew.gar...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
wrote:
The only thing I'm trying to
2014-01-28 Mauricio Tavares raubvo...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Darod Zyree darodzy...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-01-28 Laurent Wandrebeck l.wandreb...@quelquesmots.fr
Matt Garman matthew.gar...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Sorin Srbu
Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
Matt Garman matthew.gar...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
wrote:
The only thing I'm trying to accomplish is a system which will allow me
to keep user accounts and passwords in one place, with one place only to
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Mauricio Tavares
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 15:20
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
We do have Active Directory as well, but only for the Windows clients
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Behalf Of Mauricio Tavares
We do have Active Directory as well, but only for the Windows clients.
But I'd rather keep them separated.
Kerberos on linux. Is that a pain or a bigger pain?
Whenever I've worked with Kerberos on Windows I've come out all sweaty
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:18 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
At this late date, I'd be really, *REALLY* leery of using NIS. You say
that *most* of your traffic is local, suggesting that some of it is *not*.
And, for that matter, how good are the firewalls keeping other traffic
out?
I'd say no
Matt Garman wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:18 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
snip
We have an in-house written set of scripts that administer relevant
configuration files, including /etc/passwd. It copies the correct
version of that file (among many others) to each host, and shell of
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Matt Garman matthew.gar...@gmail.com wrote:
Here you may not realize you're distinguishing between authentication and
authorization.
Yeah, I forgot to mention that we already have Kerberos in place for
authentication. It's authorization that is currently
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 17:09
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Hmm, yes. It would seem most everybody recomends Kerberos. Will have
...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 17:09
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Hmm, yes. It would seem most everybody recomends Kerberos. Will have to
look into it then.
Remember, kerboros came from
On Jun 28, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Michael Coffman michael.coff...@avagotech.com
wrote:
I would believe this information is shared from the server to the
other computers but here users still can connect (via SSH). If I try
to get the information on the user connected I have:
# chage -l USER
user
Dear all,
I have a NIS server which shares a database of users between some
computers (nodes exactly) and I would like that, on the first login,
the user changes its password.
So, on the NIS server I have made: chage -d 0 USER
Then:
# cd /var/yp
# make
On the NIS server I have:
chage -l USER
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Fabien Archambault
fabien.archamba...@univ-amu.fr wrote:
Dear all,
I have a NIS server which shares a database of users between some
computers (nodes exactly) and I would like that, on the first login,
the user changes its password.
So, on the NIS server I
Hello listmates.
It appears that in order to authenticate a Mac OS X Lion client via NIS the
passwords in passwd and passwd.byname maps need to be MD5 encrypted. How do
I see what encryption has been used in my maps? How do I change it?
Thanks.
Boris.
Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello listmates.
It appears that in order to authenticate a Mac OS X Lion client via NIS the
passwords in passwd and passwd.byname maps need to be MD5 encrypted. How do
I see what encryption has been used in my maps? How do I change it?
I think it is the case that Lion
ann kok writes:
Hi
How can we use NIS to control a user in different servers?
eg: serverA /home/userA/javaapplication
serverB /export/home/userA/javaapplication
serverC /vol/home/javaapplication
If you use NIS auto.home for home directories in general, e.g. /home/user,
you can
Hi
How can we use NIS to control a user in different servers?
eg: serverA /home/userA/javaapplication
serverB /export/home/userA/javaapplication
serverC /vol/home/javaapplication
Thank you
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
ann kok wrote:
Hi
How can we use NIS to control a user in different servers?
eg: serverA /home/userA/javaapplication
serverB /export/home/userA/javaapplication
serverC /vol/home/javaapplication
Thank you
Could you be more specific on what you are trying to do ?
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 05:05:40PM -0700, ann kok wrote:
Hi
How can we use NIS to control a user in different servers?
eg: serverA /home/userA/javaapplication
serverB /export/home/userA/javaapplication
serverC /vol/home/javaapplication
Thank you
Automounter maps? I guess
of known working
exploits against current yp-family versions on CentOS?
NIS+ is not, the last time I checked, available for Linux; if
my understanding is in error I would very much welcome
correction.
John
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Peter Serwe wrote:
After dealing with a couple of issues with OpenLDAP, I'd say it beats the
piss out of NIS all day long. NIS is ancient and decrepit.
Agreed.
Hard to believe, but certain very well known organizations refuse to get off
NIS for critical and secure
Hard to believe, but certain very well known organizations refuse to get off
NIS for critical and secure systems.
{{citation needed}}
:-)
--
Drew
Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood.
--Marie Curie
___
CentOS mailing list
We just updated our configuratiosn to have multiple NIS servers, when we
initiated a test of client failover, we were disapointed.
It seemed that the only way to get a filaover was to /etc/init.d/ypbind restart.
It behaves as indicated in
We just updated our configuratiosn to have multiple NIS servers, when we
initiated a test of client failover, we were disapointed.
It seemed that the only way to get a filaover was to /etc/init.d/ypbind
restart.
It behaves as indicated in
against current yp-family versions on CentOS?
NIS+ is not, the last time I checked, available for Linux; if
my understanding is in error I would very much welcome
correction.
John
--
We cannot do everything at once
of curiousity, can you point me to writeups of known working
exploits against current yp-family versions on CentOS?
NIS+ is not, the last time I checked, available for Linux; if
my understanding is in error I would very much welcome
correction.
I believe Sun recently dropped NIS
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:44:54PM -0700, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Not one you want to hear: ditch NIS. It's known to have a *lot* of
security holes. At the very least, NIS+. Better would be either RH
NIS+ is a dead product. Even Sun gave up pushing it. (Funny; in 1995 the
Solaris training
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 01:50:16PM -0600, John R. Dennison wrote:
Out of curiousity, can you point me to writeups of known working
exploits against current yp-family versions on CentOS?
The problem isn't an exploit of the specific tools; the whole mechanism
is insecure, unless you
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 14:37
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: [CentOS] NIS failover
We just updated our configuratiosn to have multiple NIS
servers
Jason Pyeron wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 14:37
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: [CentOS] NIS failover
We just updated our configuratiosn to have
Jason Pyeron wrote:
We just updated our configuratiosn to have multiple NIS servers, when we
initiated a test of client failover, we were disapointed.
It seemed that the only way to get a filaover was to /etc/init.d/ypbind
restart.
We've been using NIS like this for years - failover works
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 09:51:24AM +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
How is your /etc/yp.conf defined. NIS failover works flawlessly here if
we have /etc/yp.conf like
ypserver nis2
ypserver nis
You also need to ensure you can resolve nis and nis2 without using
NIS, so you may also need to them into
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
We just updated our configuratiosn to have multiple NIS servers, when we
initiated a test of client failover, we were disapointed.
It seemed that the only way to get a filaover was to /etc/init.d/ypbind
restart.
It
Hi list
Does anyone know about a good howto setup nis and to make ad see it
and use the usernames?
Regards
Per Qvindesland
E-mail: p...@norhex.com [1]
http://www.linkedin.com/in/perqvindesland [2]
Links:
--
[1] http://webmail.norhex.com/#
[2] http://www.linkedin.com/in/perqvindesland
Per Qvindesland wrote:
Hi list
Does anyone know about a good howto setup nis and to make ad see it
and use the usernames?
http://www.linux-nis.org/nis-howto/HOWTO/
I don't think you can get AD to 'use' NIS as a directory service, but AD
can be set up as a NIS server using IDMU (Identity
Per Qvindesland wrote:
Hi list
Does anyone know about a good howto setup nis and to make ad see it
and use the usernames?
I haven't actually set up NIS in the machine I'm using right now, but if
I remember correctly, what you need to do to get a machine to use the
usernames and passwords on
Ok I am done getting it up and running.
Thanks a million for everybodys help
Regards
Per Qvindesland
E-mail: p...@norhex.com [1]
http://www.linkedin.com/in/perqvindesland [2]
--- Original message follows ---
SUBJECT: Re: [CentOS] NIS
FROM: James Pearson
TO: CentOS mailing list
DATE: 22-07-2009
Every time a new user logs into a development box (which does not use nfs
for the home dirs) the get could not chdir to their home dir. They call me
with the error and I do a:
cp -a /etc/skel/ ~USER chown USER.users -R ~USER/
and it is fixed.
Is there an automated way?
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Every time a new user logs into a development box (which does not use nfs
for the home dirs) the get could not chdir to their home dir. They call me
with the error and I do a:
cp -a /etc/skel/ ~USER chown USER.users -R ~USER/
and it is fixed.
Is there an
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 10:27 -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:
Every time a new user logs into a development box (which does not use nfs
for the home dirs) the get could not chdir to their home dir. They call me
with the error and I do a:
cp -a /etc/skel/ ~USER chown USER.users -R ~USER/
and it
I have my NIS user/group files separate from the system user/group
files using libuser to manage them and that works well, but I am
trying to find a way to get libuser to invoke a 'make' of the NIS
maps whenever it updates the master files. Is there a routine I
can configure in libuser to do this,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ross S. W. Walker
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 10:39 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: RE: [CentOS] nis and new users
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Every time a new user logs into a development box
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 10:43 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] NIS libuser and auto-make of maps
I have my NIS user/group files separate from the system user/group
files using libuser to manage them and that works well, but I am
trying to find a way to get libuser to invoke
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
I have my NIS user/group files separate from the system user/group
files using libuser to manage them and that works well, but I am
trying to find a way to get libuser to invoke a 'make' of the NIS
maps whenever it updates the master files.
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Every time a new user logs into a development box (which does not use
nfs
for the home dirs) the get could not chdir to their home dir. They call me
with the error and I do a:
cp -a /etc/skel/ ~USER
. Walker
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 12:21 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: RE: [CentOS] NIS libuser and auto-make of maps
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
I have my NIS user/group files separate from the system user/group
files using libuser to manage them
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ross S. W. Walker
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 12:16 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: RE: [CentOS] nis and new users
Jason Pyeron wrote:
but still get:
Last login: Tue Apr 15 11:24:57
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ross S. W. Walker
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 12:16 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: RE: [CentOS] nis and new users
Well what you have will only cover console logins via the login
process
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Jason Pyeron wrote:
but still get:
Last login: Tue Apr 15 11:24:57 2008 from .myvzw.com
Could not chdir to home directory /home/USER: No such file or
directory
-bash-3.00$
Any ideas?
Well what you have
Jason Pyeron wrote:
How can I tell if I am using NIS+?
I would like the data to be encrypted on the lan.
I don't think NIS+ is 'supported' on Linux - see:
http://www.linux-nis.org/nisplus/
James Pearson
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Pearson
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 6:49
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS and NIS+
Jason Pyeron wrote:
How can I tell if I am using NIS+?
I would like the data to be encrypted on the lan.
I don't think NIS
Jason Pyeron wrote:
So what is the proper way to ensure root and others password (hashes) are
not sent over the lan?
kerberos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
How can I tell if I am using NIS+?
I would like the data to be encrypted on the lan.
-Jason
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
-
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I'm using
http://www.linuxhomenetworking.com/wiki/index.php/Quick_HOWTO_:_Ch30_:_Configuring_NIS
as a guide and the services all show appropriately on the production
server and client, and on a working test setup that is identical to
production.
Do you have any firewall
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, James Pearson wrote:
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I'm using
http://www.linuxhomenetworking.com/wiki/index.php/Quick_HOWTO_:_Ch30_:_Configuring_NIS
as a guide and the services all show appropriately on the production server
and client, and on a working test setup that is
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, James Pearson wrote:
Do you have any firewall setup on the server and/or clients?
Disabled all around.
What does 'rpcinfo -p' give on the server and clients?
Exactly what the referenced URL says should be running.
It would still be handy to
I did discover tcpdump produces an ICMP host hostname unreachable error
during ypbind, but does NOT do so when ypbind is not running.
I also was reminded the firewall on the server is running, but I had these
exact problems when the firewall was disabled.
Trying to track down the problem via
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I did discover tcpdump produces an ICMP host hostname unreachable
error during ypbind, but does NOT do so when ypbind is not running.
I also was reminded the firewall on the server is running, but I had
these exact problems when the firewall was disabled.
Trying to
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, James Pearson wrote:
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I did discover tcpdump produces an ICMP host hostname unreachable
error during ypbind, but does NOT do so when ypbind is not running.
I also was reminded the firewall on the server is running, but I had
On 23/10/2007, Scott Ehrlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I configured my Enterprise 5 server to have NFS configured on specific
ports via the NFS Server menu option.
Since having done that, I am unable to get my two CentOS 5 workstations to
bind via YP. One worked just fine before the port
I'm using
http://www.linuxhomenetworking.com/wiki/index.php/Quick_HOWTO_:_Ch30_:_Configuring_NIS
as a guide and the services all show appropriately on the production
server and client, and on a working test setup that is identical to
production.
The test setup works flawlessly.
Scott
On
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Scott Ehrlich
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 3:58 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS problems
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Clint Dilks wrote:
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I've got a RHEL5 server acting as a NIS/NFS server, and connected
is:
ypserver 127.0.0.1
yp.conf on the client is:
domain my-nis-domain server ip-of-server
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Scott Ehrlich
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 3:58 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS problems
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Scott Ehrlich
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 3:58 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS problems
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Clint Dilks wrote:
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I've got a RHEL5 server acting as a NIS/NFS server, and connected one C5
machine
I'm at a complete loss as to what is going on. I changed kernels and
disabled the video driver, removed the firewire card. NIS refuses to
work on this workstation.
Unless this gets figured out, I'm going to simply have to create local
user accounts, then let NFS take over.
It would be
I've got a RHEL5 server acting as a NIS/NFS server, and connected one C5
machine just fine.
I'm trying to connect another, and for the life of me, cannot figure out
why NIS won't bind. NFS works fine. ypbind just hangs. I disabled
SELinux and the firewall. I just cannot get it to bind.
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I've got a RHEL5 server acting as a NIS/NFS server, and
connected one C5
machine just fine.
I'm trying to connect another, and for the life of me, cannot
figure out
why NIS won't bind. NFS works fine. ypbind just hangs. I disabled
SELinux and the firewall.
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
