Hi all,
Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server. I
need
to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services.
Which
filesystem do you recommends me to reach maximum performance: xfs, ext3, ext4,
gfs2
??
Thanks.
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server.
I need
to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services.
Which
filesystem do you recommends me to reach maximum performance: xfs, ext3,
ext4, gfs2
??
Les Mikesell wrote:
carlopmart wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server.
I need
to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services.
Which
filesystem do you recommends me to reach maximum performance: xfs, ext3,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:47 AM, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server. I
need
to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services.
Which
filesystem do you recommends me to reach
Kwan Lowe wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:47 AM, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server.
I need
to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services.
Which
filesystem do you
carlopmart wrote:
Kwan Lowe wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:47 AM, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server.
I need
to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services.
Which
With LVMs you'd of course lose the flexibility of file-backed targets
and the ability to do sparse files are you're intending..
dd if=/dev/zero of=iqn.2009-12.com.mydomain:storage.disk01.foo.foo
bs=1 count=0 seek=16G
LVM was my first option and performance it is very very good with iSCSI,
Kwan Lowe wrote:
With LVMs you'd of course lose the flexibility of file-backed targets
and the ability to do sparse files are you're intending..
dd if=/dev/zero of=iqn.2009-12.com.mydomain:storage.disk01.foo.foo
bs=1 count=0 seek=16G
LVM was my first option and performance it is very very
I actually prefer backing up LVMs.. I use the snapshot feature which
means I can backup a live volume. Works well.
But I can't use snapshot feature because under these lvm partitions there are
ZFS,
NTFS and so on filesystems that linux can't access ...
Not sure that I'm understanding.. The
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:50 PM, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Kwan Lowe wrote:
I actually prefer backing up LVMs.. I use the snapshot feature which
means I can backup a live volume. Works well.
But I can't use snapshot feature because under these lvm partitions there are
ZFS,
10 matches
Mail list logo