Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-20 Thread Keith Roberts
Well I'm geting there slowly but surely. This home-built server machine is using hard drive caddies. I've taken my working backup drive from the caddy (secondary master), and replaced it with a small GB test drive. The problem was originally with the drive connected to the onboard IDE primary

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-20 Thread Les Mikesell
On 11/20/10 4:12 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: So it appears the onboard IDE controller is working OK, and the problem appears to be from the IDE ribbon cable, to one of the HDD caddies. Any suggs please? Errr, if you have established that you have a bad cable, isn't the obvious solution to

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-04 Thread Lamar Owen
From: Keith Roberts ke...@karsites.net On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Lamar Owen wrote: Might want to check the power supply as well. Bad/flakey power can indeed case damage to the drive surface; been there, done that, have two Maxtor 250GB drives with scribbled servo data to prove it. OK. I'm

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread Keith Roberts
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Keith Roberts wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: Keith Roberts ke...@karsites.net Subject: Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, William Warren wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: William Warren hescomins

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread Todd Denniston
Keith Roberts wrote, On 11/03/2010 10:32 AM: On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Keith Roberts wrote: SNIP There were about 79 Seek errors in the SMART logs of the HDD. SNIP vivard did not show any errors when doing a full disk erase. So I ran an Advanced r/w scan again with Hitachi DFT, and the

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread Keith Roberts
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Todd Denniston wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: Todd Denniston todd.dennis...@tsb.cranrdte.navy.mil Subject: Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes Keith Roberts wrote, On 11/03/2010 10:32 AM: On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Keith Roberts wrote: SNIP There were

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread Warren Young
On 11/3/2010 8:32 AM, Keith Roberts wrote: So to prepare the disk for returning under warranty, I used another HDD utility to clean the disk again ... So I ran an Advanced r/w scan again with Hitachi DFT, and the result was OK. A complete disk wipe brings bad sectors to the drive's

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread m . roth
Warren Young wrote: On 11/3/2010 8:32 AM, Keith Roberts wrote: So to prepare the disk for returning under warranty, I used another HDD utility to clean the disk again ... So I ran an Advanced r/w scan again with Hitachi DFT, and the result was OK. A complete disk wipe brings bad sectors

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread Warren Young
On 11/3/2010 11:27 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Yeah, but I have problems with smartmon: More likely, problems with SMART. S.M.A.R.T. is D.U.M.B. :) It's better than nothing, but sometimes not by a whole lot. one server that's got two bad sectors, which SMART reports. I've followed the

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread RedShift
On 11/03/10 17:01, Keith Roberts wrote: There were no sectors remapped, which is odd as there were bad sectors originally on the drive. I ran MemTest86+ out of curiousity, and there are 5120 Errors, some at 0.4MB 0.5 MB. You should fix that first. The BIOS has been playing up, not

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread Keith Roberts
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, RedShift wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: RedShift redsh...@pandora.be Subject: Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes On 11/03/10 17:01, Keith Roberts wrote: There were no sectors remapped, which is odd as there were bad sectors originally

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday, November 03, 2010 02:51:02 pm RedShift wrote: On 11/03/10 17:01, Keith Roberts wrote: Could a bad controller or bad RAM cause Hard Drive sector errors? Neither bad RAM or a bad controllor can physically damage a hard drive. A bad controller will not cause reallocated

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread Keith Roberts
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Lamar Owen wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu Subject: Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes On Wednesday, November 03, 2010 02:51:02 pm RedShift wrote: On 11/03/10 17:01, Keith Roberts wrote: Could a bad controller or bad RAM

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread Keith Roberts
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Warren Young wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com Subject: Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes On 11/3/2010 8:32 AM, Keith Roberts wrote: So to prepare the disk for returning under warranty, I used another HDD utility

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread John R Pierce
On 11/03/10 3:13 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: I'm running the server from an APC UPS Back-UPS 650, so there should not be any glitches in the power supply, should there? thats a simple standby kind of UPS, acts like a 'surge protector' when the AC is on, and only switches to the battery powered

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread Benjamin Franz
On 11/03/2010 03:13 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Lamar Owen wrote: Might want to check the power supply as well. Bad/flakey power can indeed case damage to the drive surface; been there, done that, have two Maxtor 250GB drives with scribbled servo data to prove it. OK. I'm

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread Warren Young
On 11/3/2010 4:18 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: I might shell out some dosh for a copy if it can non-destructably repair bad sectors. Try fsck -cc first. (Or badblocks -n) These do part of what SR does already, so if they work, that's all you need. Step up only when you need something that

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-11-03 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 3 Nov 2010 22:13:03 + (GMT) CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Lamar Owen wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu Subject: Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes On Wednesday, November 03, 2010 02:51:02

[CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-10-31 Thread Keith Roberts
Hi All. Yesterday I was installing Centos 5.5 to my web server, and it looks like the main hard drive has gone AWOL. Fedora 12 put the file system into r/o mode. The drive is an Hitachi, still under warranty. There are bad sectors on it, and running the Hitachi DFT tool confirms this. Also I

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-10-31 Thread William Warren
On 10/31/2010 3:27 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: Hi All. Yesterday I was installing Centos 5.5 to my web server, and it looks like the main hard drive has gone AWOL. Fedora 12 put the file system into r/o mode. The drive is an Hitachi, still under warranty. There are bad sectors on it, and

Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes

2010-10-31 Thread Keith Roberts
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, William Warren wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com Subject: Re: [CentOS] PATA Hard Drive woes On 10/31/2010 3:27 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: Hi All. Yesterday I was installing Centos 5.5 to my