On 11/25/2015 07:18 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Are you talking bearing in mind VirtualBox?
Actually, no. I'd either missed that detail or forgotten it by that
time in the conversation. This might be the wrong list for VirtualBox
questions, since it's not distributed with CentOS. I've worked
2015-11-14 16:43 GMT-03:00 Gordon Messmer :
> On 11/14/2015 09:20 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> I'd want to connect a VM to another VM (or eventually to the host) via the
>> "Linux bridge" so that I can demonstrate that capability in a classroom
>> with only one laptop.
>>
>
> You don't actually n
Perhaps I don't explain myself enough.
I don't want to "bridge" physical machine with virtual machine, my idea was
create a transparent bridge in a VM for example to demonstrate a proxy
with no need of topology change.
Greets
2015-11-16 5:58 GMT-03:00 Paul Knox-Kennedy :
> On 11/14/2015 09:20
On 11/14/2015 09:20 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
> I'd want to connect a VM to another VM (or eventually to the host) via the
> "Linux bridge" so that I can demonstrate that capability in a classroom
> with only one laptop.
The libvirt wiki covers this here [0]. These instructions create a
bridge (b
- Original Message -
| On 11/14/2015 09:20 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
| > I'd want to connect a VM to another VM (or eventually to the host) via the
| > "Linux bridge" so that I can demonstrate that capability in a classroom
| > with only one laptop.
If the purpose of this is to demonstrate
On 11/14/2015 09:20 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
I'd want to connect a VM to another VM (or eventually to the host) via the
"Linux bridge" so that I can demonstrate that capability in a classroom
with only one laptop.
You don't actually need to attach *any* ethernet interfaces to do that.
If you
2015-11-13 16:43 GMT-03:00 Gordon Messmer :
> On 11/13/2015 09:15 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> But AFAIK, routers divide broadcast domains, and switches (and
>> therefore bridges) divide collision domains.
>>
>
> Oh good, Cisco terminology. :)
>
Oh yeah,
>
> I'll be more specific than I
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Ulf Volmer wrote:
>On 11/13/2015 12:57 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>>When I enable stp:
>>
>> [root@localhost ~]# brctl show br0
>> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
>> br0 8000.080027a398e6 yes enp0s3
>>
On 11/13/2015 09:15 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
But AFAIK, routers divide broadcast domains, and switches (and
therefore bridges) divide collision domains.
Oh good, Cisco terminology. :)
I'll be more specific than I was earlier, then.
It's possible to unify two collision domains into a sing
2015-11-13 13:52 GMT-03:00 Gordon Messmer :
> On 11/13/2015 03:22 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to create virtualized linux bridge
>>
>
> Well, you can't do that by putting two interfaces on the same LAN. A
> bridge should be used to connect two separate LANs.
>
> _
On 11/13/2015 03:22 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
I'm trying to create virtualized linux bridge
Well, you can't do that by putting two interfaces on the same LAN. A
bridge should be used to connect two separate LANs.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cento
2015-11-13 12:32 GMT-03:00 Ulf Volmer :
> On 11/13/2015 12:57 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
> When I enable stp:
>>
>> [root@localhost ~]# brctl show br0
>> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
>> br0 8000.080027a398e6 yes enp0s3
>>
On 11/13/2015 12:57 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
When I enable stp:
[root@localhost ~]# brctl show br0
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br0 8000.080027a398e6 yes enp0s3
enp0s8
2015-11-12 15:56 GMT-03:00 Ulf Volmer :
> On 11/12/2015 07:42 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
> I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as
>> follows:
>>
>> nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own
>> address as source address
>> nov 12 15:30
2015-11-13 8:22 GMT-03:00 Sergio Belkin :
>
>
> 2015-11-12 18:07 GMT-03:00 James A. Peltier :
>
>> - Original Message -
>> | Hi,
>> |
>> | I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as
>> | follows:
>> |
>> | nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet o
2015-11-12 18:07 GMT-03:00 James A. Peltier :
> - Original Message -
> | Hi,
> |
> | I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as
> | follows:
> |
> | nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own
> | address as source address
> | nov 1
2015-11-12 18:17 GMT-03:00 John R Pierce :
> On 11/12/2015 10:42 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> DEVICE=enp0s8
>> HWADDR=08:00:27:A3:98:E6
>> BOOTPROTO=none
>> ONBOOT=yes
>> NM_CONTROLLED=no
>> BRIDGE=br0
>> DEVICE=lo
>> TYPE=loopback
>> IPADDR=127.0.0.1
>> NETMASK=255.0.0.0
>> NETWORK=127.0.0.0
>>
If you really need two bridges on the same LAN you will need to turn on STP
and give your interfaces a delay of say 10 seconds on start up. Sorry, cant
remember options to do that.
Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289
Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 25
On 11/12/2015 10:42 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
DEVICE=enp0s8
HWADDR=08:00:27:A3:98:E6
BOOTPROTO=none
ONBOOT=yes
NM_CONTROLLED=no
BRIDGE=br0
DEVICE=lo
TYPE=loopback
IPADDR=127.0.0.1
NETMASK=255.0.0.0
NETWORK=127.0.0.0
...
I hope thats two seperate files, ifcfg-enp0s8 and ifcfg-lo ... otherwise,
wh
Am 12.11.2015 um 19:42 schrieb Sergio Belkin:
[root@localhost ~]# uname -a
Linux localhost 3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 30 12:09:22 UTC 2014
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
First of all: yum update to current!
Alexander
___
CentOS mailing lis
- Original Message -
| Hi,
|
| I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as
| follows:
|
| nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own
| address as source address
| nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 wit
On 11/12/2015 12:00 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
2015-11-12 16:51 GMT-03:00 Gordon Messmer :
Do you have those two devices connected to the same LAN?
Yes I have.
Well, that will create a switch loop and flood the LAN with broadcast
traffic.
We can probably offer better advice if you tell us wh
2015-11-12 16:51 GMT-03:00 Gordon Messmer :
> On 11/12/2015 10:42 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> DEVICE=enp0s3
>> #HWADDR=08:00:27:AB:1D:E6
>> BOOTPROTO=none
>> ONBOOT=yes
>> NM_CONTROLLED=no
>> BRIDGE=br0
>>
>
> DEVICE=enp0s8
>> HWADDR=08:00:27:A3:98:E6
>> BOOTPROTO=none
>> ONBOOT=yes
>> NM_CONTRO
On 11/12/2015 10:42 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
DEVICE=enp0s3
#HWADDR=08:00:27:AB:1D:E6
BOOTPROTO=none
ONBOOT=yes
NM_CONTROLLED=no
BRIDGE=br0
DEVICE=enp0s8
HWADDR=08:00:27:A3:98:E6
BOOTPROTO=none
ONBOOT=yes
NM_CONTROLLED=no
BRIDGE=br0
Do you have those two devices connected to the same LAN?
I
On 11/12/2015 07:42 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as
follows:
nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own
address as source address
nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with
Hi,
I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as
follows:
nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own
address as source address
nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own
address as source address
And the oper
26 matches
Mail list logo