Harold Pritchett harold@... writes:
On 11/2/2013 8:57 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I have two CentOS-6.4 servers, in different places.
I am running postfix/amavis on one, and sendmail/procmail on the other.
I don't recall having any difficulty setting up sendmail many years ago
using
I have two CentOS-6.4 servers, in different places.
I am running postfix/amavis on one, and sendmail/procmail on the other.
I don't recall having any difficulty setting up sendmail many years ago
using sendmail.mc .
But I found postfix very complicated to setup last year.
(It's working fine now.)
I think sane people use exim nowadays.
On 2 November 2013 12:57, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
I have two CentOS-6.4 servers, in different places.
I am running postfix/amavis on one, and sendmail/procmail on the other.
I don't recall having any difficulty setting up sendmail many
On 02/11/13 12:57, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I have two CentOS-6.4 servers, in different places.
I am running postfix/amavis on one, and sendmail/procmail on the other.
I don't recall having any difficulty setting up sendmail many years ago
using sendmail.mc .
But I found postfix very complicated
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
I asked why postfix was preferable, but didn't any convincing reply.
The general response was along the lines that it was the modern way.
Sendmail was written back in the days of wooden computers and iron
programmers and
On 11/2/2013 8:57 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I have two CentOS-6.4 servers, in different places.
I am running postfix/amavis on one, and sendmail/procmail on the other.
I don't recall having any difficulty setting up sendmail many years ago
using sendmail.mc .
But I found postfix very
when in doubt; use google mail. :)
On 2 November 2013 15:57, Harold Pritchett har...@uga.edu wrote:
On 11/2/2013 8:57 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I have two CentOS-6.4 servers, in different places.
I am running postfix/amavis on one, and sendmail/procmail on the other.
I don't recall having any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timothy Murphy said the following on 02/11/2013 13:57:
Having looked into postfix/amavis a little further, it seems to me to
involve excessively complicated processes (at least for a simple home
server) with email going along spaghetti-like
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 10:41:53AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
I asked why postfix was preferable, but didn't any convincing reply.
The general response was along the lines that it was the modern way.
Sendmail was
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:58:33PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
I've accumulated a set of rules for the sendmail.mc file that do what
sendmail.mc ? Back in the day all we had (SunOS 4) was the cf files
that we had to mangle by hand :-)
--
rgds
Stephen
On 11/2/2013 1:43 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
sendmail.mc ? Back in the day all we had (SunOS 4) was the cf files
that we had to mangle by hand
now that was some truly scary stuff.the .mc/m4 macro stuff was a
latecomer.
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 04:43:59PM -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:58:33PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
I've accumulated a set of rules for the sendmail.mc file that do what
sendmail.mc ? Back in the day all we had (SunOS 4) was the cf files
that we had to mangle by
12 matches
Mail list logo
