centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> On 07/12/2011 02:32 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>> Add: AMD Geode (586 non-PAE) can run CentOS 5 but not 6.
>>
>> Desired: Somebody who is good with repos and rpms please put the
>> linux kernel (for centos 6) "somewhere" so
>
> the via EPIA and the P3 mentione
At 11:37 PM 7/13/2011, you wrote:
>On 07/11/2011 08:37 PM, david wrote:
> > I fear that the net-install image may not support USB keyboards,
> > which if so, is unfortunate.
> >
>
>that is not true, I've done a couple of installs on machines that only
>hae usb keyboards and its been fine. Could it
On 07/11/2011 08:37 PM, david wrote:
> I fear that the net-install image may not support USB keyboards,
> which if so, is unfortunate.
>
that is not true, I've done a couple of installs on machines that only
hae usb keyboards and its been fine. Could it be a model / bios /
firmware issue ?
- KB
On 07/12/2011 02:32 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> Add: AMD Geode (586 non-PAE) can run CentOS 5 but not 6.
>
> Desired: Somebody who is good with repos and rpms please put the linux
> kernel (for centos 6) "somewhere" so
the via EPIA and the P3 mentioned earlier in this thread are all i686
comp
On 07/12/11 9:13 AM, John Hinton wrote:
> I wouldn't consider G4s old and slow... 8
> gigs of ram and a dual 3.6g xeon processors isn't all that slow or
> shabby.
except today's model is 48GB of ram[1] and dual 6 core 3Ghz CPUs, each
core of which is significantly faster than those P4/Netburst xe
john
you can inexpensively purchase proper slim dvd drives for proliant servers
we have done so for G3. G4 is essentially same
- rh
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 7/12/2011 11:13 AM, John Hinton wrote:
> I will find a way to install this on these
> Proliants, but shame on Redhat for not doing CDs.
Unless it is your first linux install at a location, NFS should be the
easy route. It was always easier than burning/juggling the whole CD set
even when the
On 7/12/2011 9:31 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> That being said, I never said it will not run on older hardware, just
> that they (most developers of most packages) don't care that much
> about older hardware, and my reply was aimed at gradual disappearance
> of CD medium from more and more d
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Drew wrote:
>>> CentOS 6 was not really intended for slower systems, none of the newer
>>> distros are. CentOS 6 kernel for example does not support 586 CPU's.
>>
>> I'd like to know where you read that because I'm looking at putting
>> CentOS 6 onto a couple of lower e
Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Fedora 12-15 for example need more space on boot partition (500MB is I
>> am not mistaken) and CentOS5/Fedora6 only needed <100MB.
>
> F12-F15 need a larger "/boot" for the "preupgrade" tool (to upgrade
> from one versi
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
> Fedora 12-15 for example need more space on boot partition (500MB is I
> am not mistaken) and CentOS5/Fedora6 only needed <100MB.
F12-F15 need a larger "/boot" for the "preupgrade" tool (to upgrade
from one version to the next) to ru
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:37 AM, david wrote:
> Folks
>
> I tried the net-install, because my computer has no DVD, only a CD.
> The system has a USB connected keyboard, and it works just fine
> accessing the built-in BIOS.
>
> However, when I booted the netinstall CD, the initial screen which
> a
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:54:56AM -0700, Drew wrote:
>>> CentOS 6 was not really intended for slower systems, none of the
>>> newer distros are. CentOS 6 kernel for example does not support 586
>>> CPU's.
>>
>> I'd like to know where you read that because I'm l
On Tuesday, July 12, 2011 08:54:56 AM Drew wrote:
> > CentOS 6 was not really intended for slower systems, none of the newer
> > distros are. CentOS 6 kernel for example does not support 586 CPU's.
>
> I'd like to know where you read that because I'm looking at putting
> CentOS 6 onto a couple of
Drew wrote:
>> CentOS 6 was not really intended for slower systems, none of the newer
>> distros are. CentOS 6 kernel for example does not support 586 CPU's.
>
> I'd like to know where you read that because I'm looking at putting
> CentOS 6 onto a couple of lower end boxes, specifically a
> P3-800
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:54:56AM -0700, Drew wrote:
> > CentOS 6 was not really intended for slower systems, none of the newer
> > distros are. CentOS 6 kernel for example does not support 586 CPU's.
>
> I'd like to know where you read that because I'm looking at putting
> CentOS 6 onto a couple
> CentOS 6 was not really intended for slower systems, none of the newer
> distros are. CentOS 6 kernel for example does not support 586 CPU's.
I'd like to know where you read that because I'm looking at putting
CentOS 6 onto a couple of lower end boxes, specifically a
P3-800(mobile) and an older
david wrote:
> COMMENT: One of the nice properties of Linux has been that it can be
> installed and run on "old" hardware. I wonder if this feature is going away.
CentOS dev team will, in next few days release several general purpose
CD's Like Minimal server CD and Minimal Installation CD. Liv
Folks
I tried the net-install, because my computer has no DVD, only a CD.
The system has a USB connected keyboard, and it works just fine
accessing the built-in BIOS.
However, when I booted the netinstall CD, the initial screen which
asks for the type of installation did not respond to the keyb
19 matches
Mail list logo
