Nicholas wrote:
Its not a matter of licensing.
Since the days of various Linux distros, coming up with diff schemes
made it difficult for developers to target a Linux. Hence the need to
give the source, go compile in your own system mentality. This puts
off many non techie ppl.
Just
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Sure, it will make the transition smoother for gamers, sound
engineers, etc who need those extra drivers, but how would it work for
the different distro's? I mean, if we have CentOS LSB, and the
directory file structure is standard complaint, does it mean other
distro's
on 6-26-2008 11:40 PM Nicholas spake the following:
Wow!
Thats a lot of money. The Pass thru mentioned, does it also mean that
payment need to be made?
I wonder what is the purpose of them charging so much?
That is probably their only source of income since they don't really sell or
Nicholas wrote:
Wow!
Thats a lot of money. The Pass thru mentioned, does it also mean that
payment need to be made?
I wonder what is the purpose of them charging so much?
Scott Silva wrote:
on 6-18-2008 6:55 AM Johnny Hughes spake the following:
Nicholas wrote:
Herrold,
I meant RH, in
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Sorry to ask this, but what exactly is the LSB? What will CentOS (and
probably) the community gain from it? I mean, apart from RedHat
Enterprise, Suse Enterpise and the other commercial Linux's, most other
linuxes are not certified AFAIK.
I know CentOS stands out
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Sorry to ask this, but what exactly is the LSB? What will CentOS (and
probably) the community gain from it? I mean, apart from RedHat
Enterprise, Suse Enterpise and the other commercial Linux's, most other
linuxes are not certified AFAIK.
I
Its not a matter of licensing.
Since the days of various Linux distros, coming up with diff schemes
made it difficult for developers to target a Linux. Hence the need to
give the source, go compile in your own system mentality. This puts off
many non techie ppl.
Just imagine when a driver
Nicholas wrote:
Its not a matter of licensing.
Since the days of various Linux distros, coming up with diff schemes
made it difficult for developers to target a Linux. Hence the need to
give the source, go compile in your own system mentality. This puts off
many non techie ppl.
Just
;)
Yes, thats another problem.
Les Mikesell wrote:
Nicholas wrote:
Its not a matter of licensing.
Since the days of various Linux distros, coming up with diff schemes
made it difficult for developers to target a Linux. Hence the need to
give the source, go compile in your own system
9 matches
Mail list logo
