[CentOS] Samba server choices

2012-12-05 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I have been running a customized version Amahi for a couple years for my Samba server. It is time for an upgrade, and I will be moving away from Amahi, as they have abandoned Fedora for Ubuntu. Back when I selected Amahi to replace my 15 year old NT server, I looked around and only considered

Re: [CentOS] Samba server choices

2012-12-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote: So far I have two options: Pull off the config files from my Amahi server: Bind, DHCP, Samba, and probably MySQL. I had customized things enough (and few of my 'bug' fixes made it back into the base) that I know

Re: [CentOS] Samba server choices

2012-12-05 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/5/2012 7:47 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: So my question to all of you is, what other options are out there? A Win7 future kind of makes SME more attractive than rolling my own. I don't understand that justification? Samba is Samba, the configs are pretty straight forward.

Re: [CentOS] Samba server choices

2012-12-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:41 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: So my question to all of you is, what other options are out there? A Win7 future kind of makes SME more attractive than rolling my own. I don't understand that justification? Samba is Samba, the configs are pretty

Re: [CentOS] Samba server choices

2012-12-05 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 12/05/2012 12:09 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote: So far I have two options: Pull off the config files from my Amahi server: Bind, DHCP, Samba, and probably MySQL. I had customized things enough (and few of my 'bug'

Re: [CentOS] Samba server choices

2012-12-05 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 12/05/2012 12:41 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 12/5/2012 7:47 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: So my question to all of you is, what other options are out there? A Win7 future kind of makes SME more attractive than rolling my own. I don't understand that justification? Samba is Samba, the

Re: [CentOS] Samba server choices

2012-12-05 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 12/05/2012 01:04 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:41 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: So my question to all of you is, what other options are out there? A Win7 future kind of makes SME more attractive than rolling my own. I don't understand that justification?

Re: [CentOS] Samba server choices

2012-12-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote: Look at ClearOS. I haven't used it beyond installing in a test VM, but it looks like it would be a suitable SME replacement with a more up to date code base. What distro is it based on? A quick browse through

Re: [CentOS] Samba server choices

2012-12-05 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 12/05/2012 12:19 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 12/05/2012 12:41 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 12/5/2012 7:47 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: So my question to all of you is, what other options are out there? A Win7 future kind of makes SME more attractive than rolling my own. I don't understand

Re: [CentOS] Samba server choices

2012-12-05 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 12/05/2012 02:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote: Look at ClearOS. I haven't used it beyond installing in a test VM, but it looks like it would be a suitable SME replacement with a more up to date code base. What

Re: [CentOS] Samba server choices

2012-12-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote: As for mail, I will have to look at it. I looked at Zarafa a couple years ago, and can't remember why I rejected it. I haven't looked that recently - the older versions used postfix with cyrus or dovecot - and you