On 4/8/2014 12:35 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> The raid10 name is very misleading. I came to the same conclusion
> yesterday: for sake of clarity I will make two raid1 arrays and combine
> them into a raid0;)
>
> Thanks for all info.
its striped mirrors, its just that it treats it all as one big rai
The raid10 name is very misleading. I came to the same conclusion
yesterday: for sake of clarity I will make two raid1 arrays and combine
them into a raid0 ;)
Thanks for all info.
BR,
Rafal.
2014-04-08 8:49 GMT+02:00 Christopher Chan :
> On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 03:47 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote
On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 03:47 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> As far as I know raid10 is ~ "a raid0 built on top of two raid1" (
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nested_RAID_levels#RAID_1.2B0 - raid10). So I
> think that by default in my case:
No, Linux md raid10 is NOT a nested raid setup where you bu
On 2014-04-07, Rafa? Radecki wrote:
> I would really appreciate a definite answer which partitions I can remove
> and which I cannot remove at the same time because I need to perform some
> disk maintenance tasks on this raid10 array. Thanks for all help!
You're likely to get the most definitive
On 4/7/2014 12:47 PM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> As far as I know raid10 is ~ "a raid0 built on top of two raid1" (
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nested_RAID_levels#RAID_1.2B0 - raid10). So I
> think that by default in my case:
>
> /dev/sda6 and /dev/sdb6 form the first "raid1"
> /dev/sdd6 and /dev/s
Hi All.
I have a server which uses RAID10 made of 4 partitions for / and boots from
it. It looks like so:
mdadm -D /dev/md1
/dev/md1:
Version : 00.90
Creation Time : Mon Apr 27 09:25:05 2009
Raid Level : raid10
Array Size : 973827968 (928.71 GiB 997.20 GB)
Used Dev Size : 48
6 matches
Mail list logo
