[CentOS] somewhat OT -- are .appimage files safe?

2019-03-04 Thread Kay Schenk
Hello all. I'm in the midst of trying to transfer a G+ community to something else. I came across this site-- https://blog.friendsplus.me/export-google-plus-feeds-45926c925891 that actually has an advanced "exporter" app but it is an ".appimage" app. I am not familiar with this at all and

[CentOS] Somewhat OT: OpenOffice.org Headless issues as non-root user

2009-07-31 Thread Sergio Belkin
Hi, I've installed recently OpenOffice.org 3.1 on Centos 5.3. I use OOo in headless mode. I have no problem when running as root, but I'd prefer run it as non-root user (oooserver user). When I run the script in debug mode this is the output: sh -x/tmp/ooo-headless-nonroot start + .

Using Nagios in CentOS (It was Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT: (Nagios))

2008-05-15 Thread Sergio Belkin
2008/5/14 Thomas Harold [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sergio Belkin wrote: 2008/5/13 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: OK, you won :) I'm going to test nagios. I am using centos 5.1 x86_64. Do I lose much if I use rpm from rpmforge (version 2.9)? We're running version 2.11 at the office (on CentOS 5.1 x86_64).

Re: Using Nagios in CentOS (It was Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT: (Nagios))

2008-05-15 Thread Sergio Belkin
Really, thanks all for your experiences. Bear in mind that what I want to do is (mainly) monitor network switches, and get data and charts of them. I hope I can do that. Keep in touch -- Hi, I have a problem with check_snmp plugin, it outputs: [1210863277] SERVICE ALERT:

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT: (Nagios)

2008-05-15 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Thomas Harold wrote: Oh, and SELinux will probably get in your way. There's an understatement. :-) Nagios needs to do so many things, that devising a decent policy for it is tear-your-hair-out hard. It's also a moving target if you, like me, want to add tests for every

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-14 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Sorry for the top post. Your mailer breaking references and thus destroying threading for others is worse than top posting :) Cheers, Ralph pgpzENf9mbwtx.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-14 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: centos@centos.org centos@centos.org Sent: Wed May 14 06:48:50 2008 Subject: Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT: Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Sorry for the top post. Your mailer breaking references and thus destroying threading for others is worse than top posting :) Cheers, Ralph

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-14 Thread Sergio Belkin
2008/5/13 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sergio Belkin wrote: Even so, thanks for your comments, I'd like more experiences about monitoring systems. Again of topic, I want to avoid Nagios because it looks like over complex but if someone has an actual experience demostrating the opposite, I'd be glad

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-14 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Sergio Belkin wrote: OK, you won :) I'm going to test nagios. I am using centos 5.1 x86_64. Do I lose much if I use rpm from rpmforge (version 2.9)? I'm using the x86_64 version of nagios-2.11-1.el5.rf from rpmforge on our nagios server. Works like a charm. -- Paul

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-14 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Ross S. W. Walker wrote on Wed, 14 May 2008 08:53:05 -0400: I thought Outlook does a pretty good job on references. It's okay if used standalone. You may have lost references because of the way you are connected to Exchange. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-14 Thread Thomas Harold
Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Nagios can start very simple, but has the ability to end up very complex. It's configs take a modular approach, you have monitors, monitors belong in groups, groups have operators/administrators, etc. We just finished setting up Nagios at our office. It's not that

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT: (Nagios)

2008-05-14 Thread Thomas Harold
Sergio Belkin wrote: 2008/5/13 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: OK, you won :) I'm going to test nagios. I am using centos 5.1 x86_64. Do I lose much if I use rpm from rpmforge (version 2.9)? We're running version 2.11 at the office (on CentOS 5.1 x86_64). I've looked at some of the things in 3.0, but

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-13 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Sergio Belkin wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 23:07:20 -0300: [CentOS] Somewhat OT: even then please write a senseful subject next time! Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-13 Thread Chris Clonch
On Monday 12 May 2008 10:07:20 Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a monitoring system that support snmp v3. I want to monitorize linux servers and network switches. Currently, I am trying to use zabbix, but sadly, it lack at present features that I need. For example, I want to get

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-13 Thread Sergio Belkin
2008/5/13 Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sergio Belkin wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 23:07:20 -0300: [CentOS] Somewhat OT: even then please write a senseful subject next time! Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-13 Thread Sergio Belkin
2008/5/12 Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a monitoring system that support snmp v3. I want to monitorize linux servers and network switches. Currently, I am trying to use zabbix, but sadly, it lack at present features that I need. For example, I

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-13 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
on windows, but it runs very nicely as a VM guest. -Ross - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Tue May 13 07:34:50 2008 Subject: Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT: 2008/5/13 Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sergio Belkin wrote

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-13 Thread Les Mikesell
Sergio Belkin wrote: 2008/5/12 Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a monitoring system that support snmp v3. I want to monitorize linux servers and network switches. Currently, I am trying to use zabbix, but sadly, it lack at present features that I need.

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-13 Thread Les Mikesell
Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Sorry for the top post. Nagios can start very simple, but has the ability to end up very complex. Network management is never simple. I'd say OpenNMS is somewhat the opposite in that the initial install can be somewhat complicated (although much less so now that

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-13 Thread jleaver+centos
Sergio Belkin wrote: Even so, thanks for your comments, I'd like more experiences about monitoring systems. Again of topic, I want to avoid Nagios because it looks like over complex but if someone has an actual experience demostrating the opposite, I'd be glad to hear. Thanks in advance

[CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-12 Thread Sergio Belkin
Hi, I'm looking for a monitoring system that support snmp v3. I want to monitorize linux servers and network switches. Currently, I am trying to use zabbix, but sadly, it lack at present features that I need. For example, I want to get reporting screens with data and graphs from network switches,

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-12 Thread Ross Cavanagh
Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a monitoring system that support snmp v3. I want to monitorize linux servers and network switches. Currently, I am trying to use zabbix, but sadly, it lack at present features that I need. For example, I want to get reporting screens with data and graphs

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-12 Thread Sergio Belkin
2008/5/12 Ross Cavanagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a monitoring system that support snmp v3. I want to monitorize linux servers and network switches. Currently, I am trying to use zabbix, but sadly, it lack at present features that I need. For example,

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:

2008-05-12 Thread Les Mikesell
Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a monitoring system that support snmp v3. I want to monitorize linux servers and network switches. Currently, I am trying to use zabbix, but sadly, it lack at present features that I need. For example, I want to get reporting screens with data and graphs