Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT: (Nagios)

On Wed, 14 May 2008, Thomas Harold wrote: Oh, and SELinux will probably get in your way. There's an understatement. :-) Nagios needs to do so many things, that devising a decent policy for it is tear-your-hair-out hard. It's also a moving target if you, like me, want to add tests for every

Re: Using Nagios in CentOS (It was Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT: (Nagios))

> Really, thanks all for your experiences. Bear in mind that what I want > to do is (mainly) monitor network switches, and get data and charts > of them. I hope I can do that. > > Keep in touch > > -- Hi, I have a problem with check_snmp plugin, it outputs: [1210863277] SERVICE ALERT: sw1;Uptim

Using Nagios in CentOS (It was Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT: (Nagios))

2008/5/14 Thomas Harold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sergio Belkin wrote: >> >> 2008/5/13 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> OK, you won :) I'm going to test nagios. I am using centos 5.1 >> x86_64. Do I lose much if I use rpm from rpmforge (version 2.9)? >> > > We're running version 2.11 at the office (on Cen

Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT: (Nagios)

Sergio Belkin wrote: 2008/5/13 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: OK, you won :) I'm going to test nagios. I am using centos 5.1 x86_64. Do I lose much if I use rpm from rpmforge (version 2.9)? We're running version 2.11 at the office (on CentOS 5.1 x86_64). I've looked at some of the things in 3.0, bu