On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 10:10 -0700, semi linux wrote:
... snip ...
> Not top posting (although I think this a preference more then a rule).
>
> Let me clarify what I'm asking - What's different about the stage2.img
> file distributed with CentOS 5.0? The instructions found on the web
> for 'hackin
On 8/28/07, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> semi linux wrote:
> > Good call... I had thought of that but had assumed it would only
> > present me the same options as anaconda does (all local - hdx and/or
> > fdx)... as it turns-out, the --source=http:// could work nicely...
> > I'll gi
semi linux wrote:
Good call... I had thought of that but had assumed it would only
present me the same options as anaconda does (all local - hdx and/or
fdx)... as it turns-out, the --source=http:// could work nicely...
I'll give it a shot.
Just out of curiosity though, what is the process for m
Good call... I had thought of that but had assumed it would only
present me the same options as anaconda does (all local - hdx and/or
fdx)... as it turns-out, the --source=http:// could work nicely...
I'll give it a shot.
Just out of curiosity though, what is the process for mounting /
recreating
semi linux wrote:
Since CentOS 5.0 is based on 2.6.18-8.el5 is was looking for a way to
incorporate their driver from the website so I wouldn't have to use
the "linux dd" kernel option all the time. (trying to automate as much
as possible using kickstart, scripts, etc).
you can use the dd optio
I've got a RAID card (3ware 9650SE-2LP) that wasn't supported by the
in-kernel driver until 2.6.19+
Since CentOS 5.0 is based on 2.6.18-8.el5 is was looking for a way to
incorporate their driver from the website so I wouldn't have to use
the "linux dd" kernel option all the time. (trying to automa
6 matches
Mail list logo
