Le 31/05/2016 à 16:47, Andreas Benzler a écrit :
> Well specifically for centos-5 .. I am not sure. But CentOS-5 is less
>> than a year from EOL anyway, so if you are supporting those in a
>> desktop, you should be considering how to move them to at least CentOS-6
>> now (if not CentOS-7).
Well,
Centos 6 Sounds good to me if You came from 5. and the repros Worked me
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> Am 31.05.2016 um 12:44 schrieb Johnny Hughes :
>
>> On 05/31/2016 05:12 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have to maintain (and eventually beef up) desktop clients in public
>> libraries
Le 31/05/2016 à 12:55, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
> BTW. I have no idea if RPMFusion is still active or not for CentOS,
> maybe others on the list know. My Nux! repo comment is an alternative
> for C6 and C7.
I just figured out they have their own mailing list, so I subscribed and
asked them directl
On 05/31/2016 05:12 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have to maintain (and eventually beef up) desktop clients in public
> libraries running CentOS 5 and 6. The hardware is still OK, though
> sometimes really old, so the least evil will be to keep CentOS 5 on the
> old machines until that ver
On 05/31/2016 05:12 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have to maintain (and eventually beef up) desktop clients in public
> libraries running CentOS 5 and 6. The hardware is still OK, though
> sometimes really old, so the least evil will be to keep CentOS 5 on the
> old machines until that ver
Hi,
I have to maintain (and eventually beef up) desktop clients in public
libraries running CentOS 5 and 6. The hardware is still OK, though
sometimes really old, so the least evil will be to keep CentOS 5 on the
old machines until that version is EOL.
I've been using CentOS 5 as my main system s
6 matches
Mail list logo
