Re: [CentOS] The state of xfs on CentOS 6?

2014-05-28 Thread Keith Keller
On 2014-05-28, m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: We're looking at getting an HBR (that's a technical term, honkin' big RAID). What I'm considering is, rather than chopping it up into 14TB or 16TB filesystems, of using xfs for really big filesystems. The question that's come up is:

Re: [CentOS] The state of xfs on CentOS 6?

2014-05-28 Thread James A. Peltier
- Original Message - | We're looking at getting an HBR (that's a technical term, honkin' big | RAID). What I'm considering is, rather than chopping it up into 14TB | or | 16TB filesystems, of using xfs for really big filesystems. The | question | that's come up is: what's the state of xfs

Re: [CentOS] The state of xfs on CentOS 6?

2014-05-28 Thread John R Pierce
On 5/28/2014 11:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: We're looking at getting an HBR (that's a technical term, honkin' big RAID). What I'm considering is, rather than chopping it up into 14TB or 16TB filesystems, of using xfs for really big filesystems. The question that's come up is: what's the

Re: [CentOS] The state of xfs on CentOS 6?

2014-05-28 Thread James A. Peltier
- Original Message - | On 5/28/2014 11:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: | We're looking at getting an HBR (that's a technical term, honkin' | big | RAID). What I'm considering is, rather than chopping it up into | 14TB or | 16TB filesystems, of using xfs for really big filesystems. The

Re: [CentOS] The state of xfs on CentOS 6?

2014-05-28 Thread John R Pierce
On 5/28/2014 12:35 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: Would this be the xfs_asynd chewing up CPU time bug? If that's the one, it was just spinning and didn't actually cause problems except that the load went berserk. In either case, there have been bugs with*every file system* I've used with