I've changed the subject line. It has nothing to do with my question with
my original post, that no one seems to have any answer to, what file
image# 1 is looking for.
This bloody email has now been blocked *twice*.
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/09/2012 10:43 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 3:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I've changed the subject line. It has nothing to do with my question with
my original post, that no one seems to have any answer to, what file
image# 1 is looking for.
This bloody email has now been blocked *twice*.
quite simply,
Craig White wrote:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 3:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I've changed the subject line. It has nothing to do with my question
with my original post, that no one seems to have any answer to, what file
image# 1 is looking for.
This bloody email has now been blocked *twice*.
On Jan 9, 2012, at 3:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I am *NOT* going to jump hosting providers
every time this happens.
fine, you've made your choice - you should spare us the grief of your own
choices.
--
Craig White ~ craig.wh...@ttiltd.com
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Craig White craig.wh...@ttiltd.com wrote:
I am *NOT* going to jump hosting providers
every time this happens.
fine, you've made your choice - you should spare us the grief of your own
choices.
It's pretty hard to beat a free gmail account for mail
On 01/09/12 2:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I've argued before that blocks should be by source - actual source, the
oldest Received-From, not from the last mailer.
Those are far too easily forged, and in fact a majority of spam has
forged Recieved headers, you can only trust the one YOUR mail
6 matches
Mail list logo
