>OK, so the drivers are paravirtualized, not the
>entire OS. I think I get it.
Yeah, instead of me paraphrasing and probably butchering
what is well stated, have a quick read of this article.
Lots of good info...
http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid94_gci1281856_mem
geographically redudant database system.
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph L. Casale
> Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 4:28 PM
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Win
>> No. Vmware is no different than Xen or any other in this respect, they
>> also don't have access to the source and therefore cannot provide a modified
>> version of the OS.
>
>But Vmware and I think Virtualbox are capable of running unmodified
>Windows guests even on CPU's lacking the vt capabil
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> AFAIK you can only run any windows version in paravirtualized mode
>> only in vmware server, not in Xen or KVM which are the virtualization
>> technologies CentOS supports.
>
> No. Vmware is no different than Xen or any other in this respect, they
> also don't have acces
2009/7/8 Joseph L. Casale :
>>AFAIK you can only run any windows version in paravirtualized mode
>>only in vmware server, not in Xen or KVM which are the virtualization
>>technologies CentOS supports.
>
> No. Vmware is no different than Xen or any other in this respect, they
> also don't have acces
>AFAIK you can only run any windows version in paravirtualized mode
>only in vmware server, not in Xen or KVM which are the virtualization
>technologies CentOS supports.
No. Vmware is no different than Xen or any other in this respect, they
also don't have access to the source and therefore cannot
>I thought I have seen a lot of discussion about
>running paravirtualized Windows on CentOS. Is
>that a bad idea?
It's not a bad idea, it's just not a possible one :)
What you have seen is talk of the paravirt *drivers* that
you use in an HVM domain to improve the otherwise useless
performance. A
2009/7/8 Neil Aggarwal :
> Hello:
>
> According to the Red Hat Virtualization Guide,
> Windows Server 2003 32-bit will only run as
> a fully virtualized guest on an AMD64 system.
>
> I thought I have seen a lot of discussion about
> running paravirtualized Windows on CentOS. Is
> that a bad idea?
Hello:
According to the Red Hat Virtualization Guide,
Windows Server 2003 32-bit will only run as
a fully virtualized guest on an AMD64 system.
I thought I have seen a lot of discussion about
running paravirtualized Windows on CentOS. Is
that a bad idea?
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846
9 matches
Mail list logo
